The Impact of Introducing Managed Care Intermediaries for Long-Term Services and Supports.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Deepon Bhaumik, Jacob Wallace, David C Grabowski, Mark J Schlesinger
{"title":"The Impact of Introducing Managed Care Intermediaries for Long-Term Services and Supports.","authors":"Deepon Bhaumik, Jacob Wallace, David C Grabowski, Mark J Schlesinger","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the impact of managed long-term services and supports (MLTSS) on the use of long-term care, as well as acute care.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>We use a staggered difference-in-differences (DiDs) regression design, exploiting the variation in timing of the rollout of MLTSS programs across states between 2004 and 2018. We compared individuals in states that implemented MLTSS with individuals in states that did not implement MLTSS. Our outcomes included formal home care use, nursing home status, informal care use, hospitalizations, overnight nursing home visits, and falls.</p><p><strong>Data source and analytic sample: </strong>This study uses secondary data from the Health and Retirement Study data, linked with state identifiers. The sample includes adults aged 65 and older who report at least one functional limitation.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The shift to MLTSS leads to a 2.5 percentage point (pp) increase (95% CI: 0.8 pp, 4.3 pp) in home care users, a 3-percentage point decrease (95% CI: -5.38 pp, -0.25 pp) in informal care users, and no statistically significant change in nursing home occupancy or health outcomes. We also find suggestive evidence of reductions in the number of home care individuals living in MLTSS states receive, with a 7.02-h (95% CI: -12.96, -1.07), or nearly 27% decrease, in monthly formal care received by this population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that MLTSS increased the share of home and community-based services (HCBS) users but restricted the amount of HCBS used per beneficiary, with ambiguity around whether this occurred at the expense of beneficiaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14462"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14462","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To study the impact of managed long-term services and supports (MLTSS) on the use of long-term care, as well as acute care.

Study setting and design: We use a staggered difference-in-differences (DiDs) regression design, exploiting the variation in timing of the rollout of MLTSS programs across states between 2004 and 2018. We compared individuals in states that implemented MLTSS with individuals in states that did not implement MLTSS. Our outcomes included formal home care use, nursing home status, informal care use, hospitalizations, overnight nursing home visits, and falls.

Data source and analytic sample: This study uses secondary data from the Health and Retirement Study data, linked with state identifiers. The sample includes adults aged 65 and older who report at least one functional limitation.

Principal findings: The shift to MLTSS leads to a 2.5 percentage point (pp) increase (95% CI: 0.8 pp, 4.3 pp) in home care users, a 3-percentage point decrease (95% CI: -5.38 pp, -0.25 pp) in informal care users, and no statistically significant change in nursing home occupancy or health outcomes. We also find suggestive evidence of reductions in the number of home care individuals living in MLTSS states receive, with a 7.02-h (95% CI: -12.96, -1.07), or nearly 27% decrease, in monthly formal care received by this population.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that MLTSS increased the share of home and community-based services (HCBS) users but restricted the amount of HCBS used per beneficiary, with ambiguity around whether this occurred at the expense of beneficiaries.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信