Structural Discrimination in Nonprofit Hospital Community Benefit Spending.

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Aaron Hedquist, David Blumenthal, Dannie Dai, Jessica Phelan, E John Orav, Jose F Figueroa
{"title":"Structural Discrimination in Nonprofit Hospital Community Benefit Spending.","authors":"Aaron Hedquist, David Blumenthal, Dannie Dai, Jessica Phelan, E John Orav, Jose F Figueroa","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Nonprofit hospitals receive substantial tax exemptions to provide a community benefit. However, little is known about the distribution of community benefit spending (CBS) across US communities with varying degrees of social vulnerability beyond the hospital's immediate geographic area.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess associations of CBS per capita with community-level characteristics and social determinants of health.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study used Internal Revenue Service Series 990 Tax Forms from 2018 to 2023, to create a dataset of CBS for nonprofit hospitals in the US. Facility-level CBS allocation to counties was based on inpatient utilization to more accurately reflect a hospital's community. Data were analyzed from January to December 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>County-level race and ethnicity characteristics and socioeconomic factors, including educational attainment, proportion living below 138% of the federal poverty level (FPL), and the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) score.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was total CBS per capita. Generalized linear regression models with a γ log-link function were used to assess the association of CBS per capita with community-level social determinants of health characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2465 nonprofit hospitals across 3140 US counties were included. Allocation of CBS varied significantly across communities, with the counties in the highest quintile receiving a mean (SD) of $540 ($250) per capita compared with counties in the lowest quintile with $22 ($16) per capita. Communities in the highest quintile of CBS had a higher proportion of White residents, while communities in the lowest quintile had a higher proportion of residents who were non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic, had lower educational attainment, and were living with incomes below 138% of the FPL. For every 1% proportional increase in non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic residents in a community, there was 1.61% (95% CI, 1.38%-1.84%) and 0.88% (95% CI, 0.63%-1.14%) less CBS per capita, respectively. In addition, there was less allocation of CBS per capita among counties with a greater proportion of people with low educational attainment, greater levels of poverty, or higher SVI scores. These results were consistent before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This cross-sectional study found that nonprofit hospitals' CBS was regressively allocated across US communities, with more socially vulnerable or racially and ethnically minoritized communities receiving less benefit than more affluent, non-Hispanic White communities, suggesting that the nonprofit tax system may be structurally discriminatory and contributing to health disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 2","pages":"e245523"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871545/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Nonprofit hospitals receive substantial tax exemptions to provide a community benefit. However, little is known about the distribution of community benefit spending (CBS) across US communities with varying degrees of social vulnerability beyond the hospital's immediate geographic area.

Objective: To assess associations of CBS per capita with community-level characteristics and social determinants of health.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study used Internal Revenue Service Series 990 Tax Forms from 2018 to 2023, to create a dataset of CBS for nonprofit hospitals in the US. Facility-level CBS allocation to counties was based on inpatient utilization to more accurately reflect a hospital's community. Data were analyzed from January to December 2024.

Exposures: County-level race and ethnicity characteristics and socioeconomic factors, including educational attainment, proportion living below 138% of the federal poverty level (FPL), and the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) score.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was total CBS per capita. Generalized linear regression models with a γ log-link function were used to assess the association of CBS per capita with community-level social determinants of health characteristics.

Results: A total of 2465 nonprofit hospitals across 3140 US counties were included. Allocation of CBS varied significantly across communities, with the counties in the highest quintile receiving a mean (SD) of $540 ($250) per capita compared with counties in the lowest quintile with $22 ($16) per capita. Communities in the highest quintile of CBS had a higher proportion of White residents, while communities in the lowest quintile had a higher proportion of residents who were non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic, had lower educational attainment, and were living with incomes below 138% of the FPL. For every 1% proportional increase in non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic residents in a community, there was 1.61% (95% CI, 1.38%-1.84%) and 0.88% (95% CI, 0.63%-1.14%) less CBS per capita, respectively. In addition, there was less allocation of CBS per capita among counties with a greater proportion of people with low educational attainment, greater levels of poverty, or higher SVI scores. These results were consistent before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusions and relevance: This cross-sectional study found that nonprofit hospitals' CBS was regressively allocated across US communities, with more socially vulnerable or racially and ethnically minoritized communities receiving less benefit than more affluent, non-Hispanic White communities, suggesting that the nonprofit tax system may be structurally discriminatory and contributing to health disparities.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信