Moral resilience protects nurses from moral distress and moral injury.

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Petros Galanis, Katerina Iliopoulou, Aglaia Katsiroumpa, Ioannis Moisoglou, Michael Igoumenidis
{"title":"Moral resilience protects nurses from moral distress and moral injury.","authors":"Petros Galanis, Katerina Iliopoulou, Aglaia Katsiroumpa, Ioannis Moisoglou, Michael Igoumenidis","doi":"10.1177/09697330251324298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The relationship between moral resilience, moral distress, and moral injury among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic has been widely investigated; however, the literature in the post-COVID-19 era is scarce. <b>Research aim:</b> To examine the impact of moral resilience on moral distress and moral injury among nurses after the COVID-19 pandemic.<b>Research design:</b> Cross-sectional study.<b>Participants and research context:</b> We obtained a convenience sample of 1118 nurses in Greece. We collected demographic data (gender, age) and work-related data (understaffed wards, shift work, clinical experience). We measured moral resilience with the revised \"Rushton Moral Resilience Scale\", moral distress with the \"Moral Distress Thermometer\", and moral injury with the \"Moral Injury Symptom Scale-Healthcare Professionals\" version. We adjusted all multivariable models for demographic variables.<b>Ethical considerations:</b> The Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens approved our study protocol (approval number; 474, approved: November 2023). Our study followed the Declaration of Helsinki.<b>Findings/results:</b> Multivariable linear regression analysis showed that moral resilience reduced moral distress and moral injury. In particular, we found that increased response to moral adversity was associated with decreased moral distress (adjusted coefficient beta = -1.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -2.07 to -1.54). Moreover, we found that increased response to moral adversity (adjusted coefficient beta = -8.24, 95% CI = -9.37 to -7.10) and increased moral efficacy (adjusted coefficient beta = -3.24, 95% CI = -5.03 to -1.45) were associated with reduced moral injury.<b>Conclusions:</b> Moral resilience can reduce the level of moral distress and moral injury among nurses. However, the persistence of moderate moral resilience among Greek nurses does not guarantee its sustainability. To ensure that this resilience is maintained and potentially enhanced, it is imperative for nurse leaders and policymakers to strategically design interventions to address issues at the organizational, team, and individual levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"9697330251324298"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251324298","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The relationship between moral resilience, moral distress, and moral injury among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic has been widely investigated; however, the literature in the post-COVID-19 era is scarce. Research aim: To examine the impact of moral resilience on moral distress and moral injury among nurses after the COVID-19 pandemic.Research design: Cross-sectional study.Participants and research context: We obtained a convenience sample of 1118 nurses in Greece. We collected demographic data (gender, age) and work-related data (understaffed wards, shift work, clinical experience). We measured moral resilience with the revised "Rushton Moral Resilience Scale", moral distress with the "Moral Distress Thermometer", and moral injury with the "Moral Injury Symptom Scale-Healthcare Professionals" version. We adjusted all multivariable models for demographic variables.Ethical considerations: The Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens approved our study protocol (approval number; 474, approved: November 2023). Our study followed the Declaration of Helsinki.Findings/results: Multivariable linear regression analysis showed that moral resilience reduced moral distress and moral injury. In particular, we found that increased response to moral adversity was associated with decreased moral distress (adjusted coefficient beta = -1.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -2.07 to -1.54). Moreover, we found that increased response to moral adversity (adjusted coefficient beta = -8.24, 95% CI = -9.37 to -7.10) and increased moral efficacy (adjusted coefficient beta = -3.24, 95% CI = -5.03 to -1.45) were associated with reduced moral injury.Conclusions: Moral resilience can reduce the level of moral distress and moral injury among nurses. However, the persistence of moderate moral resilience among Greek nurses does not guarantee its sustainability. To ensure that this resilience is maintained and potentially enhanced, it is imperative for nurse leaders and policymakers to strategically design interventions to address issues at the organizational, team, and individual levels.

道德弹性保护护士免受道德困境和道德伤害。
背景:COVID-19大流行期间护士道德韧性、道德困境和道德伤害之间的关系已被广泛调查;然而,关于后新冠肺炎时代的文献却很少。研究目的:探讨新冠肺炎大流行后护士道德韧性对道德困境和道德伤害的影响。研究设计:横断面研究。参与者和研究背景:我们获得了希腊1118名护士的方便样本。我们收集了人口统计数据(性别、年龄)和与工作相关的数据(人手不足的病房、轮班工作、临床经验)。我们使用修订后的“拉什顿道德弹性量表”测量道德弹性,使用“道德痛苦温度计”测量道德痛苦,使用“道德伤害症状量表-医疗保健专业人员”版本测量道德伤害。我们根据人口统计变量调整了所有多变量模型。伦理考虑:雅典国立和Kapodistrian大学护理学院伦理委员会批准了我们的研究方案(批准号;474,批准:2023年11月)。我们的研究遵循了《赫尔辛基宣言》。发现/结果:多变量线性回归分析显示,道德弹性降低了道德痛苦和道德伤害。特别是,我们发现对道德逆境的反应增加与道德困境的减少有关(调整系数β = -1.81, 95%置信区间[CI] = -2.07至-1.54)。此外,我们发现对道德逆境的反应增加(调整系数β = -8.24, 95% CI = -9.37至-7.10)和道德效能的增加(调整系数β = -3.24, 95% CI = -5.03至-1.45)与道德伤害的减少有关。结论:道德弹性可以降低护士的道德困扰和道德伤害水平。然而,希腊护士适度的道德韧性并不能保证其可持续性。为了确保维持和潜在地增强这种韧性,护士领导和政策制定者必须战略性地设计干预措施,以解决组织、团队和个人层面的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信