GP referral to rapid diagnostic centres for non-specific cancer symptoms: a qualitative study.

IF 2 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-08-12 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0179
Caroline White, Spencer Robinson, Una Macleod, Charlotte Kelly
{"title":"GP referral to rapid diagnostic centres for non-specific cancer symptoms: a qualitative study.","authors":"Caroline White, Spencer Robinson, Una Macleod, Charlotte Kelly","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosing cancer can be challenging, especially when patients present to GPs with serious, but non-specific symptoms. Rapid diagnostic centres (RDCs) have been introduced in England as diagnostic pathways for patients with non-specific symptoms where cancer is suspected, but they do not meet existing cancer pathway criteria.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate GP perspectives on referral to an RDC pathway for patients with non-specific symptoms and suspected cancer.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with GPs, within the catchment area of an acute NHS trust in the UK.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>GP interviews focusing on experiences of using the RDC pathway. A thematic analysis was conducted on interview transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GPs reported the RDC pathway as a game changer. It offered faster referral, reduced anxiety for GPs and patients, and reduced the need for GPs to '<i>game the system</i>' when patients do not meet criteria for cancer-specific pathways. The narrative required on referral appeared to legitimise GP gut feelings and expertise. RDC results (if not cancer) gave GPs space to treat patients without concern of a missed cancer, while ensuring onward referral for those with cancer or other serious conditions. Some access barriers, especially related to travel and time, were identified especially for patients in rural areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This cancer pathway fills a referral gap for GPs and patients with non-specific potential cancer symptoms. It has an important signposting function, helping identify patients requiring treatment for cancer or other serious conditions, and others whose symptoms can be treated safely within primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diagnosing cancer can be challenging, especially when patients present to GPs with serious, but non-specific symptoms. Rapid diagnostic centres (RDCs) have been introduced in England as diagnostic pathways for patients with non-specific symptoms where cancer is suspected, but they do not meet existing cancer pathway criteria.

Aim: To investigate GP perspectives on referral to an RDC pathway for patients with non-specific symptoms and suspected cancer.

Design & setting: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with GPs, within the catchment area of an acute NHS trust in the UK.

Method: GP interviews focusing on experiences of using the RDC pathway. A thematic analysis was conducted on interview transcripts.

Results: GPs reported the RDC pathway as a game changer. It offered faster referral, reduced anxiety for GPs and patients, and reduced the need for GPs to 'game the system' when patients do not meet criteria for cancer-specific pathways. The narrative required on referral appeared to legitimise GP gut feelings and expertise. RDC results (if not cancer) gave GPs space to treat patients without concern of a missed cancer, while ensuring onward referral for those with cancer or other serious conditions. Some access barriers, especially related to travel and time, were identified especially for patients in rural areas.

Conclusion: This cancer pathway fills a referral gap for GPs and patients with non-specific potential cancer symptoms. It has an important signposting function, helping identify patients requiring treatment for cancer or other serious conditions, and others whose symptoms can be treated safely within primary care.

非特异性癌症症状的全科医生转诊到快速诊断中心:一项定性研究。
背景:诊断癌症是具有挑战性的,特别是当患者出现严重的,但非特异性症状全科医生(gp)。在英格兰,快速诊断中心(rdc)已被引入,作为怀疑患有癌症的非特异性症状患者的诊断途径,但它们不符合现有的癌症途径标准。目的:探讨全科医生对非特异性症状和疑似癌症患者转介RDC途径的看法。设计与设置:在急性NHS信托的集水区与全科医生进行半结构化访谈方法:全科医生访谈侧重于使用RDC途径的经验。对访谈笔录进行专题分析。结果:全科医生报告RDC通路是游戏规则改变者。它提供了更快的转诊,减少了全科医生和患者的焦虑,并减少了全科医生在患者不符合癌症特定途径标准时“玩弄系统”的需要。转诊所需的叙述似乎使全科医生的直觉和专业知识合法化。RDC结果(如果不是癌症)给了全科医生治疗病人的空间,而不用担心遗漏癌症,同时确保癌症或其他严重疾病患者的转诊。确定了一些获取障碍,特别是与旅行和时间有关的障碍,特别是对农村地区的患者。结论:这一癌症途径填补了全科医生和非特异性潜在癌症症状患者的转诊空白。它具有重要的指示功能,有助于识别需要治疗癌症/其他严重疾病的患者,以及其他症状可以在初级保健中安全治疗的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信