GP referral to rapid diagnostic centres for non-specific cancer symptoms: a qualitative study.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0179
Caroline White, Spencer Robinson, Una Macleod, Charlotte Kelly
{"title":"GP referral to rapid diagnostic centres for non-specific cancer symptoms: a qualitative study.","authors":"Caroline White, Spencer Robinson, Una Macleod, Charlotte Kelly","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosing cancer can be challenging, especially when patients present to General Practitioners (GPs) with serious, but nonspecific symptoms. Rapid Diagnostic Centres (RDCs) have been introduced in England as diagnostic pathways for patients with non-specific symptoms where cancer is suspected, but they do not meet existing cancer pathway criteria.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate GP perspectives on referral to an RDC pathway for patients with non-specific symptoms and suspected cancer.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Semi-structured interviews with GPs within the catchment area of an acute NHS Trust METHOD: GP interviews focusing on experiences of using the RDC pathway. A thematic analysis was conducted on interview transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GPs reported the RDC pathway as a game changer. It offered faster referral, reduced anxiety for GPs and patients, and reduced the need for GPs to 'game the system' when patients do not meet criteria for cancer-specific pathways. The narrative required on referral appeared to legitimise GP gut feelings and expertise. RDC results (if not cancer) gave GPs space to treat patients without concern of a missed cancer, while ensuring onward referral for those with cancer or other serious conditions. Some access barriers, especially related to travel and time, were identified especially for patients in rural areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This cancer pathway fills a referral gap for GPs and patients with non-specific potential cancer symptoms. It has an important signposting function, helping identify patients requiring treatment for cancer/other serious conditions, and others whose symptoms can be treated safely within primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diagnosing cancer can be challenging, especially when patients present to General Practitioners (GPs) with serious, but nonspecific symptoms. Rapid Diagnostic Centres (RDCs) have been introduced in England as diagnostic pathways for patients with non-specific symptoms where cancer is suspected, but they do not meet existing cancer pathway criteria.

Aim: To investigate GP perspectives on referral to an RDC pathway for patients with non-specific symptoms and suspected cancer.

Design & setting: Semi-structured interviews with GPs within the catchment area of an acute NHS Trust METHOD: GP interviews focusing on experiences of using the RDC pathway. A thematic analysis was conducted on interview transcripts.

Results: GPs reported the RDC pathway as a game changer. It offered faster referral, reduced anxiety for GPs and patients, and reduced the need for GPs to 'game the system' when patients do not meet criteria for cancer-specific pathways. The narrative required on referral appeared to legitimise GP gut feelings and expertise. RDC results (if not cancer) gave GPs space to treat patients without concern of a missed cancer, while ensuring onward referral for those with cancer or other serious conditions. Some access barriers, especially related to travel and time, were identified especially for patients in rural areas.

Conclusion: This cancer pathway fills a referral gap for GPs and patients with non-specific potential cancer symptoms. It has an important signposting function, helping identify patients requiring treatment for cancer/other serious conditions, and others whose symptoms can be treated safely within primary care.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信