Chronic pain - prevalence, demographic inequalities and healthcare utilisation: a primary care database analysis.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0147
Siddesh Shetty, James Scuffell, Dianne Aitken, Mark Ashworth
{"title":"Chronic pain - prevalence, demographic inequalities and healthcare utilisation: a primary care database analysis.","authors":"Siddesh Shetty, James Scuffell, Dianne Aitken, Mark Ashworth","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pain (CP) is an ill-defined condition, often under-recorded in primary care records.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine prevalence, evidence of health inequalities, primary care consultation rates and healthcare utilisation costs of CP.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Cross-sectional, retrospective study using anonymised primary care data from all GP practices in one inner-city London area.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>CP was defined on the basis of analgesic medication codes and novel inclusion of diagnostic codes for conditions known to be strongly associated with CP. CP prevalence and consultation rates were determined; comparisons were made with 31 other Long-Term Condition (LTCs). Consultation cost estimates were based on health care professional type and consultation mode.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>358 889 adult patients were registered in sample practices, with continuous (12-month) health care records available for 327 800 (91.3%). CP prevalence was 18.6%; the second most prevalent LTC after anxiety at 21.4%. CP mean annual consultation rates were 15.3/patient, the highest LTC consultation rate. CP incurred the highest primary care consultation costs of any of the included LTCs. Age was the strongest predictor of CP, particularly in those aged≥60 years (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR): 9.32; 95% Confidence Interval: 8.83 to 9.84; compared to 18-39-year-olds). Much smaller AORs were found for ethnicity, social deprivation, gender and non-UK country of birth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CP represents the most demanding LTC, in terms of consultation rates and costs, managed in primary care. Yet there is considerable uncertainty about optimal management and alternatives to long term, high volume primary care consultation rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain (CP) is an ill-defined condition, often under-recorded in primary care records.

Aim: To determine prevalence, evidence of health inequalities, primary care consultation rates and healthcare utilisation costs of CP.

Design & setting: Cross-sectional, retrospective study using anonymised primary care data from all GP practices in one inner-city London area.

Method: CP was defined on the basis of analgesic medication codes and novel inclusion of diagnostic codes for conditions known to be strongly associated with CP. CP prevalence and consultation rates were determined; comparisons were made with 31 other Long-Term Condition (LTCs). Consultation cost estimates were based on health care professional type and consultation mode.

Results: 358 889 adult patients were registered in sample practices, with continuous (12-month) health care records available for 327 800 (91.3%). CP prevalence was 18.6%; the second most prevalent LTC after anxiety at 21.4%. CP mean annual consultation rates were 15.3/patient, the highest LTC consultation rate. CP incurred the highest primary care consultation costs of any of the included LTCs. Age was the strongest predictor of CP, particularly in those aged≥60 years (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR): 9.32; 95% Confidence Interval: 8.83 to 9.84; compared to 18-39-year-olds). Much smaller AORs were found for ethnicity, social deprivation, gender and non-UK country of birth.

Conclusion: CP represents the most demanding LTC, in terms of consultation rates and costs, managed in primary care. Yet there is considerable uncertainty about optimal management and alternatives to long term, high volume primary care consultation rates.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信