Patient outcomes after interhospital transfer: the impact of early intensive care unit upgrade.

Q2 Medicine
Hospital practice (1995) Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1080/21548331.2025.2470107
Saqib H Baig, James D Lee, Erika J Yoo
{"title":"Patient outcomes after interhospital transfer: the impact of early intensive care unit upgrade.","authors":"Saqib H Baig, James D Lee, Erika J Yoo","doi":"10.1080/21548331.2025.2470107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is little known about the prevalence and outcomes of medical patients requiring early intensive care unit upgrade (EIU) following interhospital transfer, and previous studies of EIU focus on patients admitted through the emergency room. We aimed to examine the characteristics and risk factors for poor outcome among medical patients undergoing EIU after interhospital transfer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The publicly available Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) IV database (2008-2019) was queried to identify non-surgical patients undergoing interhospital transfer. Patients who subsequently underwent EIU, defined as ICU admission within 24 hours of arrival after interhospital transfer, were compared to those who did not experience EIU for differences in mortality and length-of-stay (LOS.) We used multivariate logistic regression to identify risk factors for hospital death in this population and negative binomial regression to estimate the impact of EIU on hospital LOS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 5,619 patients who underwent interhospital transfer, of which 339 (6.0%) experienced EIU and 5280 (94.0%) did not. Patients undergoing EIU after interhospital transfer were significantly older (median age 69 vs. 64 years; <i>p</i> = 0.001,) but there was no difference in sex. After risk-adjustment, we found an association between EIU and a higher risk of mortality (aOR 6.9, 95%CI 5.24-9.08). Increased comorbidity burden as measured by Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was linked to higher odds of death (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.22-1.31,) as was nonwhite race (aOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.34-2.14). EIU was associated with a longer hospital LOS (IRR 1.40, 95%CI 1.28-1.54).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EIU after interhospital transfer is associated with higher mortality and longer LOS. Further study will help identify process features of transfer and patient characteristics contributing to poor outcome after arrival from an outlying facility and guide efforts to mitigate risk and provide equitable care across the transfer continuum.</p>","PeriodicalId":35045,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice (1995)","volume":" ","pages":"2470107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice (1995)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2025.2470107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is little known about the prevalence and outcomes of medical patients requiring early intensive care unit upgrade (EIU) following interhospital transfer, and previous studies of EIU focus on patients admitted through the emergency room. We aimed to examine the characteristics and risk factors for poor outcome among medical patients undergoing EIU after interhospital transfer.

Materials and methods: The publicly available Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) IV database (2008-2019) was queried to identify non-surgical patients undergoing interhospital transfer. Patients who subsequently underwent EIU, defined as ICU admission within 24 hours of arrival after interhospital transfer, were compared to those who did not experience EIU for differences in mortality and length-of-stay (LOS.) We used multivariate logistic regression to identify risk factors for hospital death in this population and negative binomial regression to estimate the impact of EIU on hospital LOS.

Results: We identified 5,619 patients who underwent interhospital transfer, of which 339 (6.0%) experienced EIU and 5280 (94.0%) did not. Patients undergoing EIU after interhospital transfer were significantly older (median age 69 vs. 64 years; p = 0.001,) but there was no difference in sex. After risk-adjustment, we found an association between EIU and a higher risk of mortality (aOR 6.9, 95%CI 5.24-9.08). Increased comorbidity burden as measured by Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was linked to higher odds of death (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.22-1.31,) as was nonwhite race (aOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.34-2.14). EIU was associated with a longer hospital LOS (IRR 1.40, 95%CI 1.28-1.54).

Conclusion: EIU after interhospital transfer is associated with higher mortality and longer LOS. Further study will help identify process features of transfer and patient characteristics contributing to poor outcome after arrival from an outlying facility and guide efforts to mitigate risk and provide equitable care across the transfer continuum.

背景:人们对医院间转院后需要提前升级重症监护室(EIU)的内科患者的患病率和预后知之甚少,以往对EIU的研究主要集中在通过急诊室入院的患者。我们的目的是研究在医院间转院后接受重症监护室升级的内科病人的特征和不良预后的风险因素:我们查询了公开的重症监护医学信息中心(MIMIC)IV数据库(2008-2019年),以确定接受院间转运的非手术患者。我们使用多变量逻辑回归确定了该人群住院死亡的风险因素,并使用负二项回归估计了EIU对住院时间的影响:我们确定了 5619 名接受院间转运的患者,其中 339 人(6.0%)经历过 EIU,5280 人(94.0%)没有经历过 EIU。医院间转运后接受 EIU 的患者年龄明显偏大(中位年龄 69 岁对 64 岁;P = 0.001),但性别无差异。经过风险调整后,我们发现 EIU 与较高的死亡风险之间存在关联(aOR 6.9,95%CI 5.24-9.08)。以夏尔森合并症指数(CCI)衡量的合并症负担增加与较高的死亡几率有关(aOR 1.26,95% CI 1.22-1.31),非白人种族也与较高的死亡几率有关(aOR 1.69,95% CI 1.34-2.14)。EIU与较长的住院时间有关(IRR 1.40,95%CI 1.28-1.54):结论:院间转运后的 EIU 与较高的死亡率和较长的住院时间有关。进一步的研究将有助于确定转院过程中的特征以及从外院到达医院后导致不良预后的患者特征,并为在转院过程中降低风险和提供公平护理提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital practice (1995)
Hospital practice (1995) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信