Pediatric Sepsis Phenotype in a Single-Center Cohort Covering 2010-2020: Evolution in Day 1-Day 3 Trajectory and Potential Prognostic Value.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Zachary Aldewereld, Christopher Horvat, Gilles Clermont
{"title":"Pediatric Sepsis Phenotype in a Single-Center Cohort Covering 2010-2020: Evolution in Day 1-Day 3 Trajectory and Potential Prognostic Value.","authors":"Zachary Aldewereld, Christopher Horvat, Gilles Clermont","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the utility of day 3 sepsis phenotype classifications compared with day 1 and whether these could be reliably identified using routine clinical data on day 1.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients managed 2010-2014 and 2018-2020.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic children's hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>One thousand eight hundred twenty-eight children (1 mo to 18 yr old) admitted to the PICU with suspected infection who received a minimum of 7 days of systemic antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Subjects showed significant evolution of phenotype from day 1 to day 3, with 31.7-60.9% remaining the same type. Outcomes were worst in those classifying as type D on day 3, with mortality as high as 16.6% in those that were classified as type D on both days 1 and 3, as well as 11.3% in those initially classified as type C (a lower mortality type) on day 1 but type D on day 3. Accurate statistical prediction of day 3 types using multinomial logistic regression and random forest and day 1 data was poor, despite attempts to improve performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our retrospective cohort of patients with sepsis, we identified significant evolution in phenotype over the first 3 days of illness. Day 3 phenotypes may provide more accurate statistical prediction of outcomes, but identification of day 3 phenotypes using data available early in the course of illness is challenging. New methods will likely be required to improve performance in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003708","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the utility of day 3 sepsis phenotype classifications compared with day 1 and whether these could be reliably identified using routine clinical data on day 1.

Design: Retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients managed 2010-2014 and 2018-2020.

Setting: Academic children's hospital.

Patients: One thousand eight hundred twenty-eight children (1 mo to 18 yr old) admitted to the PICU with suspected infection who received a minimum of 7 days of systemic antibiotics.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Subjects showed significant evolution of phenotype from day 1 to day 3, with 31.7-60.9% remaining the same type. Outcomes were worst in those classifying as type D on day 3, with mortality as high as 16.6% in those that were classified as type D on both days 1 and 3, as well as 11.3% in those initially classified as type C (a lower mortality type) on day 1 but type D on day 3. Accurate statistical prediction of day 3 types using multinomial logistic regression and random forest and day 1 data was poor, despite attempts to improve performance.

Conclusions: In our retrospective cohort of patients with sepsis, we identified significant evolution in phenotype over the first 3 days of illness. Day 3 phenotypes may provide more accurate statistical prediction of outcomes, but identification of day 3 phenotypes using data available early in the course of illness is challenging. New methods will likely be required to improve performance in this area.

2010-2020年单中心队列儿童脓毒症表型:第1- 3天轨迹的演变和潜在的预后价值
目的:研究与第1天相比,第3天脓毒症表型分类的效用,以及是否可以使用第1天的常规临床数据可靠地确定这些表型。设计:2010-2014年和2018-2020年儿科患者的回顾性队列研究。单位:学术儿童医院。患者:一千八百二十八名儿童(1个月至18岁)因疑似感染而入住PICU,接受了至少7天的全身抗生素治疗。干预措施:没有。测量结果和主要结果:受试者表型从第1天到第3天发生了显著的进化,31.7-60.9%的人保持了相同的类型。在第3天被分类为D型的患者中,结果最差,在第1天和第3天被分类为D型的患者中死亡率高达16.6%,在第1天被分类为C型(死亡率较低)但在第3天被分类为D型的患者中死亡率为11.3%。尽管尝试提高性能,但使用多项逻辑回归和随机森林以及第1天数据对第3天类型的准确统计预测很差。结论:在我们对脓毒症患者的回顾性队列研究中,我们发现在发病的前3天表型发生了显著的变化。第3天表型可能提供更准确的结果统计预测,但在病程早期使用可用数据识别第3天表型具有挑战性。可能需要新的方法来提高这方面的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信