Luigi A De Vitis, Gabriella Schivardi, Leah Grcevich, Ilaria Capasso, Diletta Fumagalli, Sarju Dahal, Antonio Lembo, Daniel M Breitkopf, Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso, Angela J Fought, Noah E Johnson, Melanie P Caserta, Jennings J Clingan, Giovanni D Aletti, Andrea Mariani, Annie T Packard, Carrie L Langstraat
{"title":"Diagnostic Algorithms for Adnexal Masses in the Hands of a Novice Operator.","authors":"Luigi A De Vitis, Gabriella Schivardi, Leah Grcevich, Ilaria Capasso, Diletta Fumagalli, Sarju Dahal, Antonio Lembo, Daniel M Breitkopf, Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso, Angela J Fought, Noah E Johnson, Melanie P Caserta, Jennings J Clingan, Giovanni D Aletti, Andrea Mariani, Annie T Packard, Carrie L Langstraat","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the performance of four commonly used algorithms to differentiate benign from malignant adnexal masses when used by a novice operator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women with adnexal masses treated at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, in 2019 were identified retrospectively. Patients were included if they underwent surgery within 3 months of diagnosis or had at least 10 months of follow-up. A nonexpert operator (European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology level I) classified each lesion using ADNEX (Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa), two-step strategy (benign descriptors followed by ADNEX), O-RADS (Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System) 2019, and O-RADS 2022. The primary outcome measure was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) compared across the four algorithms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 556 women were included in the analyses: 452 with benign and 104 with malignant masses. The AUCs of ADNEX, the two-step strategy, O-RADS 2019, and O-RADS 2022 were 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.94), 0.91 (95% CI,0.88-0.94), 0.88 (95% CI,0.84-0.91), and 0.88 95% CI, (0.84-0.91), respectively. The two-step strategy performed significantly better than the O-RADS algorithms ( P =.005 and P =.002). With all the algorithms, the observed malignancy rate was 1.9-2.2% among lesions categorized as almost certainly benign, twofold higher than the expected less than 1.0%. Lesions wrongly classified as almost certainly benign were borderline tumors (n=4) and metastases (n=3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the hands of a novice operator, all algorithms performed well and were able to distinguish benign from malignant lesions. Although the two-step strategy performed slightly better than the O-RADSs, the difference did not appear to be clinically meaningful. The malignancy rate among lesions classified as almost certainly benign was unexpectedly high at 1.9-2.3%, approximately double the expected rate of less than 1.0%.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"368-376"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005853","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare the performance of four commonly used algorithms to differentiate benign from malignant adnexal masses when used by a novice operator.
Methods: Women with adnexal masses treated at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, in 2019 were identified retrospectively. Patients were included if they underwent surgery within 3 months of diagnosis or had at least 10 months of follow-up. A nonexpert operator (European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology level I) classified each lesion using ADNEX (Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa), two-step strategy (benign descriptors followed by ADNEX), O-RADS (Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System) 2019, and O-RADS 2022. The primary outcome measure was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) compared across the four algorithms.
Results: A total of 556 women were included in the analyses: 452 with benign and 104 with malignant masses. The AUCs of ADNEX, the two-step strategy, O-RADS 2019, and O-RADS 2022 were 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.94), 0.91 (95% CI,0.88-0.94), 0.88 (95% CI,0.84-0.91), and 0.88 95% CI, (0.84-0.91), respectively. The two-step strategy performed significantly better than the O-RADS algorithms ( P =.005 and P =.002). With all the algorithms, the observed malignancy rate was 1.9-2.2% among lesions categorized as almost certainly benign, twofold higher than the expected less than 1.0%. Lesions wrongly classified as almost certainly benign were borderline tumors (n=4) and metastases (n=3).
Conclusion: In the hands of a novice operator, all algorithms performed well and were able to distinguish benign from malignant lesions. Although the two-step strategy performed slightly better than the O-RADSs, the difference did not appear to be clinically meaningful. The malignancy rate among lesions classified as almost certainly benign was unexpectedly high at 1.9-2.3%, approximately double the expected rate of less than 1.0%.
期刊介绍:
"Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics.
"Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.