Peixu Lin, Meichen Ji, Tiantian Sun, Huanhuan Sun, Haiqing Ma
{"title":"Racial Disparities and Trends in Outcomes of Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.","authors":"Peixu Lin, Meichen Ji, Tiantian Sun, Huanhuan Sun, Haiqing Ma","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01195-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. However, there are limited studies on the latest survival trends and the impact of racial disparities on GIST patients' outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We obtained 12,808 GIST patients between 2001 and 2020 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database in 17 original sites. Analysis utilizing the Kaplan-Meier method explored survival disparities and Cox regression was employed to assess the impact of prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study revealed an increase in the GIST incidence per 100,000 people over the past two decades, along with a rise in relative survival rate (RSR). Age, gender, social groups, tumor site, size, stage, socioeconomic status, marital status, surgery, and systemic therapy are prognostic factors. Subgroup analysis indicated higher incidence and poorer survival trends among Non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB) (Incidence, 1.88 per 100,000 people; 120 Mo RSR, 61.6%, 2001 to 2020). Colonic GIST has the worst prognosis among different locations, while rectal and anal GIST has the best. Within these groups, Non-Hispanic White (NHW) with colonic GIST have the poorest prognosis (HR, 2.032; 95% CI, 1.476-2.798), whereas NHB with rectal and anal GIST have the best prognosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence and RSR of GIST both increased during 2001-2020. NHW with colonic GIST showed poorer survival, while NHB with rectal and anal GIST revealed better survival, highlighting the importance of targeted clinical management for GIST.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"56 1","pages":"72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01195-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. However, there are limited studies on the latest survival trends and the impact of racial disparities on GIST patients' outcomes.
Methods: We obtained 12,808 GIST patients between 2001 and 2020 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database in 17 original sites. Analysis utilizing the Kaplan-Meier method explored survival disparities and Cox regression was employed to assess the impact of prognostic factors.
Results: Our study revealed an increase in the GIST incidence per 100,000 people over the past two decades, along with a rise in relative survival rate (RSR). Age, gender, social groups, tumor site, size, stage, socioeconomic status, marital status, surgery, and systemic therapy are prognostic factors. Subgroup analysis indicated higher incidence and poorer survival trends among Non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB) (Incidence, 1.88 per 100,000 people; 120 Mo RSR, 61.6%, 2001 to 2020). Colonic GIST has the worst prognosis among different locations, while rectal and anal GIST has the best. Within these groups, Non-Hispanic White (NHW) with colonic GIST have the poorest prognosis (HR, 2.032; 95% CI, 1.476-2.798), whereas NHB with rectal and anal GIST have the best prognosis.
Conclusion: The incidence and RSR of GIST both increased during 2001-2020. NHW with colonic GIST showed poorer survival, while NHB with rectal and anal GIST revealed better survival, highlighting the importance of targeted clinical management for GIST.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer is a multidisciplinary medium for the publication of novel research pertaining to cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract.The journal is dedicated to the most rapid publication possible.The journal publishes papers in all relevant fields, emphasizing those studies that are helpful in understanding and treating cancers affecting the esophagus, stomach, liver, gallbladder and biliary tree, pancreas, small bowel, large bowel, rectum, and anus. In addition, the Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer publishes basic and translational scientific information from studies providing insight into the etiology and progression of cancers affecting these organs. New insights are provided from diverse areas of research such as studies exploring pre-neoplastic states, risk factors, epidemiology, genetics, preclinical therapeutics, surgery, radiation therapy, novel medical therapeutics, clinical trials, and outcome studies.In addition to reports of original clinical and experimental studies, the journal also publishes: case reports, state-of-the-art reviews on topics of immediate interest or importance; invited articles analyzing particular areas of pancreatic research and knowledge; perspectives in which critical evaluation and conflicting opinions about current topics may be expressed; meeting highlights that summarize important points presented at recent meetings; abstracts of symposia and conferences; book reviews; hypotheses; Letters to the Editors; and other items of special interest, including:Complex Cases in GI Oncology: This is a new initiative to provide a forum to review and discuss the history and management of complex and involved gastrointestinal oncology cases. The format will be similar to a teaching case conference where a case vignette is presented and is followed by a series of questions and discussion points. A brief reference list supporting the points made in discussion would be expected.