Learnings from the establishment and delivery of the UK Collaborative Paediatric Palliative Care Research Network.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
George Peat, Emily Harrop, Anna-Karenia Anderson, Debbie Box, Fliss Murtagh, Richard Harding, Lucy Ziegler, Catherine Hewitt, Ian Wong, Joanna Elverson, Nicola Harris, Lorna K Fraser
{"title":"Learnings from the establishment and delivery of the UK Collaborative Paediatric Palliative Care Research Network.","authors":"George Peat, Emily Harrop, Anna-Karenia Anderson, Debbie Box, Fliss Murtagh, Richard Harding, Lucy Ziegler, Catherine Hewitt, Ian Wong, Joanna Elverson, Nicola Harris, Lorna K Fraser","doi":"10.3310/VRFT5679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are increasing numbers of children living with conditions that may threaten or shorten their lives. While child mortality has decreased in recent decades, it is estimated 4500 infants, children and young people (0-19 years) die in the United Kingdom every year. Despite a growing increase in clinical provision, there is a clear paucity in research evidence underpinning paediatric palliative care. To support research delivery, a United Kingdom-wide network composed of paediatric palliative care-sector organisations and academics with expertise in the area was developed. The network had a clear vision of establishing partnerships between academia and services delivering paediatric palliative care that would support increased research capacity and delivery in the sector.</p><p><strong>Objective(s): </strong>The overarching aim of the network was to deliver national high-quality research studies, education and materials, and build research capacity. Specific objectives included working closely with seven paediatric palliative care sites to develop guidance on the appropriate methods for undertaking research, the delivery of information and educational resources including a webinar series, offering of mentor opportunities, and the development of a minimum of two bids to National Institute for Health and Care Research related funding pathways.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A collaborative design underpinned the network. Network activity included continued partner engagement through online meetings and newsletters, scoping activity to identify research priorities, establishment of research themes, and active engagement and support from national organisations. Patient and public involvement was core to all network activity.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Network engagement largely took place online. The network has a web page hosted on the website of the organisation Together for Short Lives.</p><p><strong>Partners: </strong>Seven paediatric palliative care sites in England and Scotland (six hospices and one National Health Service hospital site) formed the network with input from several academic partners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The network achieved several outputs related to objectives including the submission of two National Institute for Health and Care Research applications for funding, the delivery of five educational webinars, the establishment of an online research toolkit and the development of a research nurse group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prior to the establishment of the network, there was no national mechanism for co-ordination for research in paediatric palliative care. In bringing together seven partner organisations and clinical and research expertise, the network has supported the foundations upon which to deliver high-quality research in the sector.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>Future work is required to support the sustainability of the network including obtaining necessary funding. Key learning from the network can be transferred and replicated across other contexts, including internationally. Grant applications and research themes developed as a result of the network will continue to develop and mature.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number NIHR135304.</p>","PeriodicalId":12898,"journal":{"name":"Health technology assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11891940/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health technology assessment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/VRFT5679","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are increasing numbers of children living with conditions that may threaten or shorten their lives. While child mortality has decreased in recent decades, it is estimated 4500 infants, children and young people (0-19 years) die in the United Kingdom every year. Despite a growing increase in clinical provision, there is a clear paucity in research evidence underpinning paediatric palliative care. To support research delivery, a United Kingdom-wide network composed of paediatric palliative care-sector organisations and academics with expertise in the area was developed. The network had a clear vision of establishing partnerships between academia and services delivering paediatric palliative care that would support increased research capacity and delivery in the sector.

Objective(s): The overarching aim of the network was to deliver national high-quality research studies, education and materials, and build research capacity. Specific objectives included working closely with seven paediatric palliative care sites to develop guidance on the appropriate methods for undertaking research, the delivery of information and educational resources including a webinar series, offering of mentor opportunities, and the development of a minimum of two bids to National Institute for Health and Care Research related funding pathways.

Design: A collaborative design underpinned the network. Network activity included continued partner engagement through online meetings and newsletters, scoping activity to identify research priorities, establishment of research themes, and active engagement and support from national organisations. Patient and public involvement was core to all network activity.

Setting: Network engagement largely took place online. The network has a web page hosted on the website of the organisation Together for Short Lives.

Partners: Seven paediatric palliative care sites in England and Scotland (six hospices and one National Health Service hospital site) formed the network with input from several academic partners.

Results: The network achieved several outputs related to objectives including the submission of two National Institute for Health and Care Research applications for funding, the delivery of five educational webinars, the establishment of an online research toolkit and the development of a research nurse group.

Conclusions: Prior to the establishment of the network, there was no national mechanism for co-ordination for research in paediatric palliative care. In bringing together seven partner organisations and clinical and research expertise, the network has supported the foundations upon which to deliver high-quality research in the sector.

Future work: Future work is required to support the sustainability of the network including obtaining necessary funding. Key learning from the network can be transferred and replicated across other contexts, including internationally. Grant applications and research themes developed as a result of the network will continue to develop and mature.

Funding: This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number NIHR135304.

从英国合作儿科姑息治疗研究网络的建立和交付中学习。
背景:越来越多的儿童生活在可能威胁或缩短其生命的条件下。虽然近几十年来儿童死亡率有所下降,但据估计,联合王国每年有4500名婴儿、儿童和年轻人(0-19岁)死亡。尽管临床提供越来越多,但支持儿科姑息治疗的研究证据明显缺乏。为了支持研究交付,开发了一个由儿科姑息治疗部门组织和具有该领域专业知识的学者组成的全英国网络。该网络有一个明确的愿景,即在学术界和提供儿科姑息治疗的服务机构之间建立伙伴关系,以支持提高该部门的研究能力和服务。目标:该网络的总体目标是提供国家高质量的研究、教育和材料,并建立研究能力。具体目标包括与7个儿科姑息治疗站点密切合作,制定关于开展研究的适当方法的指导,提供信息和教育资源,包括网络研讨会系列,提供导师机会,以及制定至少两次向国家卫生和护理研究所投标的相关资助途径。设计:支持网络的协作设计。网络活动包括通过在线会议和通讯持续的合作伙伴参与,确定研究优先事项的范围活动,建立研究主题,以及国家组织的积极参与和支持。病人和公众的参与是所有网络活动的核心。环境:网络参与度主要发生在网上。该网络在“一起度过短暂生命”组织的网站上有一个网页。合作伙伴:在几个学术合作伙伴的投入下,英格兰和苏格兰的七个儿科姑息治疗站点(六个临终关怀医院和一个国家卫生服务医院站点)组成了这个网络。结果:该网络实现了若干与目标相关的产出,包括提交了两份国家卫生和保健研究所的资助申请,举办了五次教育网络研讨会,建立了一个在线研究工具包,并建立了一个研究护士小组。结论:在网络建立之前,没有协调儿科姑息治疗研究的国家机制。该网络汇集了七个合作伙伴组织以及临床和研究专业知识,为该领域提供高质量的研究奠定了基础。未来的工作:未来的工作需要支持网络的可持续性,包括获得必要的资金。从网络中学习的关键知识可以在其他情况下转移和复制,包括在国际上。由于该网络而发展的拨款申请和研究主题将继续发展和成熟。资助:本文介绍了由国家卫生与保健研究所(NIHR)卫生技术评估计划资助的独立研究,奖励号为NIHR135304。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health technology assessment
Health technology assessment 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Technology Assessment (HTA) publishes research information on the effectiveness, costs and broader impact of health technologies for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信