Voxel-based and surface-based cortical morphometric MRI applications for identifying the epileptogenic zone: A narrative review

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Open Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1002/epi4.70012
Jacob Bunyamin, Benjamin Sinclair, Meng Law, Patrick Kwan, Terence J. O'Brien, Andrew Neal
{"title":"Voxel-based and surface-based cortical morphometric MRI applications for identifying the epileptogenic zone: A narrative review","authors":"Jacob Bunyamin,&nbsp;Benjamin Sinclair,&nbsp;Meng Law,&nbsp;Patrick Kwan,&nbsp;Terence J. O'Brien,&nbsp;Andrew Neal","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Approximately 40% of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy referred for surgical evaluation have no epileptogenic lesion on MRI (MRI-negative). MRI-negative epilepsy is associated with poorer seizure freedom prognosis and has therefore motivated the development of structural post-processing methods to “convert” MRI-negative to MRI-positive cases. In this article, we review the principles, advances, and challenges of voxel- and surface-based cortical morphometric MRI techniques in detecting the epileptogenic zone. The ground truth for the presumed epileptogenic zone in imaging studies can be classified into lesion-based (MRI lesion mask or histopathology) or epileptogenicity-based ground truth (anatomical-electroclinical correlations or resections that lead to seizure freedom). Voxel-based techniques are reported to have a 13%–97% concordance rate, while surface-based techniques have 67%–92% compared to lesion-based ground truths. Epileptogenicity-based ground truth may be more relevant in the case of MRI-negative cases; however, the sensitivity and concordance rate (voxel-based technique 7.1%–66.7%, and surface-based technique 62%) are limited by the reliance on scalp EEG and qualitative analysis of seizure-onset pattern. The use of stereo-EEG and quantitative EEG analysis may fill this gap to evaluate the correlation between cortical morphometry results and electrophysiological epileptogenic biomarkers of the epileptogenic zone and help improve the yield of structural post-processing tools.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\n \n <p>Locating the epileptogenic zone (the brain area that is responsible for seizure generation) is important to diagnose and plan epilepsy treatments. An abnormal brain imaging (MRI) result can help clinical decision-making; however, around 40% of patients have normal MRI results (MRI-negative). We are reviewing the potential of two advanced MRI methods (voxel- and surface-based cortical morphometry) to localize the epileptogenic zone in the presence or absence of visible MRI abnormalities. We also describe the current challenge of applying the above methods in daily clinical practice and propose using advanced brain recording analysis to aid this translation process.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":"10 2","pages":"380-397"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epi4.70012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epi4.70012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approximately 40% of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy referred for surgical evaluation have no epileptogenic lesion on MRI (MRI-negative). MRI-negative epilepsy is associated with poorer seizure freedom prognosis and has therefore motivated the development of structural post-processing methods to “convert” MRI-negative to MRI-positive cases. In this article, we review the principles, advances, and challenges of voxel- and surface-based cortical morphometric MRI techniques in detecting the epileptogenic zone. The ground truth for the presumed epileptogenic zone in imaging studies can be classified into lesion-based (MRI lesion mask or histopathology) or epileptogenicity-based ground truth (anatomical-electroclinical correlations or resections that lead to seizure freedom). Voxel-based techniques are reported to have a 13%–97% concordance rate, while surface-based techniques have 67%–92% compared to lesion-based ground truths. Epileptogenicity-based ground truth may be more relevant in the case of MRI-negative cases; however, the sensitivity and concordance rate (voxel-based technique 7.1%–66.7%, and surface-based technique 62%) are limited by the reliance on scalp EEG and qualitative analysis of seizure-onset pattern. The use of stereo-EEG and quantitative EEG analysis may fill this gap to evaluate the correlation between cortical morphometry results and electrophysiological epileptogenic biomarkers of the epileptogenic zone and help improve the yield of structural post-processing tools.

Plain Language Summary

Locating the epileptogenic zone (the brain area that is responsible for seizure generation) is important to diagnose and plan epilepsy treatments. An abnormal brain imaging (MRI) result can help clinical decision-making; however, around 40% of patients have normal MRI results (MRI-negative). We are reviewing the potential of two advanced MRI methods (voxel- and surface-based cortical morphometry) to localize the epileptogenic zone in the presence or absence of visible MRI abnormalities. We also describe the current challenge of applying the above methods in daily clinical practice and propose using advanced brain recording analysis to aid this translation process.

Abstract Image

基于体素和表面的皮层形态计量 MRI 应用于致痫区的识别:综述。
约40%的接受手术评估的耐药癫痫患者在MRI上没有癫痫性病变(MRI阴性)。mri阴性癫痫与较差的癫痫发作自由预后相关,因此推动了结构后处理方法的发展,以“转换”mri阴性为mri阳性病例。在本文中,我们回顾了体素和基于表面的皮质形态测量MRI技术在检测癫痫区方面的原理、进展和挑战。成像研究中假定的致痫区可分为基于病变(MRI病变掩膜或组织病理学)或基于致痫性的基础事实(解剖-电临床相关性或导致癫痫自由发作的切除)。据报道,基于体素的技术的一致性率为13%-97%,而基于表面的技术与基于病变的地面真相的一致性率为67%-92%。在mri阴性的病例中,基于癫痫原性的基本事实可能更相关;然而,灵敏度和一致性(基于体素的技术为7.1%-66.7%,基于表面的技术为62%)受到依赖头皮脑电图和定性分析癫痫发作模式的限制。使用立体脑电图和定量脑电图分析可以填补这一空白,以评估皮层形态测量结果与癫痫区电生理致痫生物标志物之间的相关性,并有助于提高结构后处理工具的产量。摘要:定位癫痫发生区(负责癫痫发作的大脑区域)对癫痫的诊断和计划治疗非常重要。异常的脑成像(MRI)结果可以帮助临床决策;然而,约40%的患者MRI结果正常(MRI阴性)。我们正在回顾两种先进的MRI方法(基于体素和基于表面的皮层形态测定法)在存在或不存在可见MRI异常的情况下定位癫痫区的潜力。我们还描述了目前在日常临床实践中应用上述方法的挑战,并建议使用先进的大脑记录分析来帮助这一翻译过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsia Open
Epilepsia Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信