Radiofrequency thermocoagulation in focal epilepsy: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Open Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1002/epi4.70009
Alejandra Vasquez, Karimul Islam, Madeline R Cross, Kai J Miller, Jamie J Van Gompel, Brian Nils Lundstrom, Anthony L Fine
{"title":"Radiofrequency thermocoagulation in focal epilepsy: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Alejandra Vasquez, Karimul Islam, Madeline R Cross, Kai J Miller, Jamie J Van Gompel, Brian Nils Lundstrom, Anthony L Fine","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Stereoelectroencephalography-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation (SEEG-guided RFTC) has been increasingly used as diagnostic and therapeutic approach for drug-resistant focal epilepsies (DREs). We aimed to describe seizure outcomes of RFTC before and after further neurosurgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective single-institution case series of patients who underwent SEEG-RFTC. The primary outcome was Engel class I-IV classification ([responders Engel I-III and non-responders Engel IV]) at last follow-up after RFTC and prior to further neurosurgical intervention (open surgical resection, laser ablation, and neuromodulation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five patients (median age 18.9 years) with DRE were included. The median follow-up time after RFTC was 7.2 months, including 20 patients who underwent further intervention (median follow-up time of 7.3 months) and 5 without intervention (median of 3.5 months). From the patients who had further intervention, 17 (85%) underwent surgical procedure (laser ablation 53%, open surgical resection 47%) (median 4.4 months) and 3 (15%) had responsive neurostimulators placed (median 6.9 months). Prior to further intervention (median follow-up 3.5 months after RFTC), 12 (48%) patients were classified as responders (12% Engel class I, 16% class II, and 20% class III) and 13 (52%) as non-responders. Following neurosurgical intervention, 17 (68%) patients were followed for a median time of 2.7 months and 3 were lost to follow-up. Of eight initial RFTC responders, 87.5% and 12.5% had Engel classes I and III, respectively. Of nine who were non-responders, 33% had Engel class I, 22% II and III, and 44% IV outcomes following further intervention. No neurologic complications were reported.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>SEEG-guided RFTC is a well-tolerated procedure and a beneficial diagnostic approach prior to further neurosurgical interventions in patients with DRE.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>SEEG-guided RFTC is a well-tolerated procedure and in the patients who experienced initial seizure reduction (n = 8), subsequent neurosurgical intervention (surgery or neuromodulation) led to favorable seizure outcomes (87.5% seizure freedom and 12.5% worthwhile seizure improvement).</p>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.70009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Stereoelectroencephalography-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation (SEEG-guided RFTC) has been increasingly used as diagnostic and therapeutic approach for drug-resistant focal epilepsies (DREs). We aimed to describe seizure outcomes of RFTC before and after further neurosurgical intervention.

Methods: Retrospective single-institution case series of patients who underwent SEEG-RFTC. The primary outcome was Engel class I-IV classification ([responders Engel I-III and non-responders Engel IV]) at last follow-up after RFTC and prior to further neurosurgical intervention (open surgical resection, laser ablation, and neuromodulation).

Results: Twenty-five patients (median age 18.9 years) with DRE were included. The median follow-up time after RFTC was 7.2 months, including 20 patients who underwent further intervention (median follow-up time of 7.3 months) and 5 without intervention (median of 3.5 months). From the patients who had further intervention, 17 (85%) underwent surgical procedure (laser ablation 53%, open surgical resection 47%) (median 4.4 months) and 3 (15%) had responsive neurostimulators placed (median 6.9 months). Prior to further intervention (median follow-up 3.5 months after RFTC), 12 (48%) patients were classified as responders (12% Engel class I, 16% class II, and 20% class III) and 13 (52%) as non-responders. Following neurosurgical intervention, 17 (68%) patients were followed for a median time of 2.7 months and 3 were lost to follow-up. Of eight initial RFTC responders, 87.5% and 12.5% had Engel classes I and III, respectively. Of nine who were non-responders, 33% had Engel class I, 22% II and III, and 44% IV outcomes following further intervention. No neurologic complications were reported.

Significance: SEEG-guided RFTC is a well-tolerated procedure and a beneficial diagnostic approach prior to further neurosurgical interventions in patients with DRE.

Plain language summary: SEEG-guided RFTC is a well-tolerated procedure and in the patients who experienced initial seizure reduction (n = 8), subsequent neurosurgical intervention (surgery or neuromodulation) led to favorable seizure outcomes (87.5% seizure freedom and 12.5% worthwhile seizure improvement).

局灶性癫痫的射频热凝术:回顾性队列研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsia Open
Epilepsia Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信