Minimising the usage of desflurane only by education and removal of the vaporisers - a before-and-after-trial.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Ferdinand Lehmann, Johannes Mader, Christian Koch, Melanie Markmann, Dominik Leicht, Michael Sander
{"title":"Minimising the usage of desflurane only by education and removal of the vaporisers - a before-and-after-trial.","authors":"Ferdinand Lehmann, Johannes Mader, Christian Koch, Melanie Markmann, Dominik Leicht, Michael Sander","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-02982-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>By exceeding planetary environmental boundaries, multiple global crises have become imminent in the 21st century. The healthcare system is a contributor to the climate crisis, accounting for approximately 5% of greenhouse gas emissions in Western countries. In anaesthetic clinics, desflurane, a highly potent greenhouse gas and volatile anaesthetic with no compelling indications, accounts for up to two thirds of total emissions. Its use can be drastically reduced using simple measures. In the present study, we investigated whether a relevant and timely reduction in use could be achieved by dismounting desflurane vaporisers and providing information to the team without restricting its use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted in a German university hospital with approximately 1250 beds, over a 12-month period between 2021 and 2022, with a comparison to the corresponding periods of the previous years up to 2017. The interventions were, first, the removal of desflurane vaporisers, and second, staff education on the climate impact of volatile anaesthetics. The primary outcome variable was the reduction of hypnotic-related emissions in CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents per anaesthetic procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prospective data collection and interventions were conducted from 28 March 2021 to 27 March 2022. The amount of CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent emissions per procedure in the form of volatile anaesthetics was reduced by 86% compared with the year before the interventions (p < 0.001). Interestingly, there was already a 52.1% reduction in the year before the procedure (p < 0.001). There were no significant changes in the use of sevoflurane or propofol. Hypnotic-related costs decreased by €14,549, whereas extubation time did not change significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Removal of desflurane vaporisers and staff training can quickly and significantly reduce the emissions of an anaesthesia department in a large German teaching hospital. This may also reduce the costs.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register, identifier DRKS00024973 on 12/04/2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11866676/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02982-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: By exceeding planetary environmental boundaries, multiple global crises have become imminent in the 21st century. The healthcare system is a contributor to the climate crisis, accounting for approximately 5% of greenhouse gas emissions in Western countries. In anaesthetic clinics, desflurane, a highly potent greenhouse gas and volatile anaesthetic with no compelling indications, accounts for up to two thirds of total emissions. Its use can be drastically reduced using simple measures. In the present study, we investigated whether a relevant and timely reduction in use could be achieved by dismounting desflurane vaporisers and providing information to the team without restricting its use.

Methods: The study was conducted in a German university hospital with approximately 1250 beds, over a 12-month period between 2021 and 2022, with a comparison to the corresponding periods of the previous years up to 2017. The interventions were, first, the removal of desflurane vaporisers, and second, staff education on the climate impact of volatile anaesthetics. The primary outcome variable was the reduction of hypnotic-related emissions in CO2 equivalents per anaesthetic procedure.

Results: Prospective data collection and interventions were conducted from 28 March 2021 to 27 March 2022. The amount of CO2 equivalent emissions per procedure in the form of volatile anaesthetics was reduced by 86% compared with the year before the interventions (p < 0.001). Interestingly, there was already a 52.1% reduction in the year before the procedure (p < 0.001). There were no significant changes in the use of sevoflurane or propofol. Hypnotic-related costs decreased by €14,549, whereas extubation time did not change significantly.

Conclusions: Removal of desflurane vaporisers and staff training can quickly and significantly reduce the emissions of an anaesthesia department in a large German teaching hospital. This may also reduce the costs.

Trial registration: The trial was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register, identifier DRKS00024973 on 12/04/2021.

仅通过教育和移除蒸发器来减少地氟醚的使用-前后试验。
背景:由于超越了地球环境的界限,在21世纪,多重全球性危机已经迫在眉睫。医疗保健系统是造成气候危机的一个因素,约占西方国家温室气体排放量的5%。在麻醉诊所,地氟醚是一种强效温室气体和挥发性麻醉剂,没有令人信服的适应症,占总排放量的三分之二。使用简单的措施就可以大大减少它的使用。在本研究中,我们调查了拆除地氟烷汽化器并在不限制其使用的情况下向团队提供信息是否可以实现相关和及时的减少使用。方法:该研究在德国一所大学医院进行,该医院拥有约1250张床位,研究时间为2021年至2022年的12个月,并与前几年截至2017年的同期进行比较。干预措施首先是取消地氟烷汽化器,其次是对工作人员进行关于挥发性麻醉剂对气候影响的教育。主要结局变量是每次麻醉过程中与催眠相关的二氧化碳当量排放量的减少。结果:从2021年3月28日至2022年3月27日进行前瞻性数据收集和干预。与干预前一年相比,每次手术中挥发性麻醉形式的二氧化碳当量排放量减少了86% (p结论:在德国一家大型教学医院,去除地氟醚汽化器和员工培训可以快速显著地减少麻醉科的排放量。这也可能降低成本。试验注册:该试验于2021年4月12日在德国临床试验注册中心注册,编号为DRKS00024973。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信