Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy on Hypoxemia in Patients After Esophagectomy.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Canadian respiratory journal Pub Date : 2025-02-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/carj/4691604
Yumei Shen, Yi Xu, Fanglan Xu, Xiaofan Wang, Shanzhou Duan, Yongbing Chen
{"title":"Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy on Hypoxemia in Patients After Esophagectomy.","authors":"Yumei Shen, Yi Xu, Fanglan Xu, Xiaofan Wang, Shanzhou Duan, Yongbing Chen","doi":"10.1155/carj/4691604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who have undergone esophagectomy are at risk of developing hypoxemia and encountering postoperative complications. It is essential to ascertain whether the high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy offers superior clinical efficacy compared to conventional oxygen therapy (COT). <b>Methods:</b> Clinical data from 80 patients who experienced hypoxemia subsequent to radical esophagectomy were retrospectively collected at our institution spanning January 2020 to December 2022. The whole cohort was divided into two groups: the HFNC group and the COT group. Following oxygen administration, we evaluated the variations in arterial blood gas parameters and infection indices within each group, in addition to scrutinizing the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications. <b>Results:</b> The HFNC group was associated with a better oxygenation index (<i>F</i> <sub>group</sub>=41.779, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (<i>F</i> <sub>group</sub>=16.760, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared with the COT group. Moreover, there were statistically significant differences in the reduction of C-reactive protein (<i>F</i> <sub>group</sub> = 17.603, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and neutrophil count (<i>F</i> <sub>group</sub> = 4.395, <i>p</i>=0.039) in the HFNC group compared with the COT group after 3 days of oxygen therapy. Notably, patients treated with HFNC exhibited a markedly reduced risk of developing postoperative complications, especially pneumonia (<i>p</i>=0.039). <b>Conclusion:</b> HFNC outperformed COT in enhancing oxygenation and reducing carbon dioxide levels and infection indices among patients with hypoxemia after radical resection of EC and also lowered the risk of postoperative pneumonia.</p>","PeriodicalId":9416,"journal":{"name":"Canadian respiratory journal","volume":"2025 ","pages":"4691604"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11867717/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian respiratory journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/carj/4691604","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who have undergone esophagectomy are at risk of developing hypoxemia and encountering postoperative complications. It is essential to ascertain whether the high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy offers superior clinical efficacy compared to conventional oxygen therapy (COT). Methods: Clinical data from 80 patients who experienced hypoxemia subsequent to radical esophagectomy were retrospectively collected at our institution spanning January 2020 to December 2022. The whole cohort was divided into two groups: the HFNC group and the COT group. Following oxygen administration, we evaluated the variations in arterial blood gas parameters and infection indices within each group, in addition to scrutinizing the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications. Results: The HFNC group was associated with a better oxygenation index (F group=41.779, p < 0.001) and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (F group=16.760, p < 0.001) compared with the COT group. Moreover, there were statistically significant differences in the reduction of C-reactive protein (F group = 17.603, p < 0.001) and neutrophil count (F group = 4.395, p=0.039) in the HFNC group compared with the COT group after 3 days of oxygen therapy. Notably, patients treated with HFNC exhibited a markedly reduced risk of developing postoperative complications, especially pneumonia (p=0.039). Conclusion: HFNC outperformed COT in enhancing oxygenation and reducing carbon dioxide levels and infection indices among patients with hypoxemia after radical resection of EC and also lowered the risk of postoperative pneumonia.

Abstract Image

高流量鼻插管氧疗对食管切除术后低氧血症的影响。
背景:食管癌(EC)患者行食管切除术后存在低氧血症和术后并发症的风险。高流量鼻插管(HFNC)治疗与常规氧疗(COT)相比是否具有更好的临床疗效是非常重要的。方法:回顾性收集我院2020年1月至2022年12月80例根治性食管切除术后低氧血症患者的临床资料。整个队列分为两组:HFNC组和COT组。在给氧后,我们评估各组动脉血气参数和感染指标的变化,并仔细检查术后肺部并发症的发生情况。结果:HFNC组氧合指数(F组=41.779,p < 0.001)和二氧化碳分压(F组=16.760,p < 0.001)优于COT组。在氧疗3 d后,HFNC组c反应蛋白(F组= 17.603,p < 0.001)和中性粒细胞计数(F组= 4.395,p=0.039)与COT组比较,差异有统计学意义。值得注意的是,接受HFNC治疗的患者出现术后并发症的风险明显降低,尤其是肺炎(p=0.039)。结论:HFNC在增强EC根治术后低氧血症患者氧合、降低二氧化碳水平及感染指标方面优于COT,并降低术后肺炎的发生风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian respiratory journal
Canadian respiratory journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Respiratory Journal is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that aims to provide a multidisciplinary forum for research in all areas of respiratory medicine. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to asthma, allergy, COPD, non-invasive ventilation, therapeutic intervention, lung cancer, airway and lung infections, as well as any other respiratory diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信