The trajectory of sleep after critical illness: a 24-month follow-up study.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Mario Henríquez-Beltrán, Iván D Benítez, Rafaela Vaca, Sally Santisteve, Maria Aguilà, Anna Vila, Olga Minguez, Carlos Rodríguez-Muñoz, Anna Galán-González, Sulamita Carvalho-Brugger, Paula González, Paula Rodríguez, Jesús Caballero, Carme Barberà, Gerard Torres, Gonzalo Labarca, Mar Malla-Banyeres, Anna Moncusí-Moix, Antoni Torres, David de Gonzalo-Calvo, Ferran Barbé, Jessica González, Adriano D S Targa
{"title":"The trajectory of sleep after critical illness: a 24-month follow-up study.","authors":"Mario Henríquez-Beltrán, Iván D Benítez, Rafaela Vaca, Sally Santisteve, Maria Aguilà, Anna Vila, Olga Minguez, Carlos Rodríguez-Muñoz, Anna Galán-González, Sulamita Carvalho-Brugger, Paula González, Paula Rodríguez, Jesús Caballero, Carme Barberà, Gerard Torres, Gonzalo Labarca, Mar Malla-Banyeres, Anna Moncusí-Moix, Antoni Torres, David de Gonzalo-Calvo, Ferran Barbé, Jessica González, Adriano D S Targa","doi":"10.1186/s13613-025-01449-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Survivors of critical illness endure long-lasting physical and mental challenges. Despite the persistence of poor sleep quality in a considerable proportion of patients at the 12-month follow-up, studies with assessments exceeding this period are limited. We aimed to investigate the trajectory of sleep over the 24 months following critical illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational, prospective study. Patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection were recruited during the intensive care unit stay. Evaluations of sleep (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]), mental health (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]), quality of life (12-item Short Form Survey [SF-12]), and other factors were performed in the short-term, and at 12 and 24 months after hospital discharge. Good sleep quality was defined as a PSQI score of ≤ 5. Minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) was defined as a decrease of ≥ 4 points in the PSQI score between the short-term assessment and the 24-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 196 patients (69.9% males), with a median [p<sub>25</sub>;p<sub>75</sub>] age of 62.0 [53.0;67.2] years. The global population showed a mean (95% CI) change of - 0.91 ( - 1.50 to - 0.31) points in the PSQI score from the short-term assessment to the 24-month follow-up. Based on PSQI score trajectories, three distinct groups of patients were identified: (i) the healthy group, consisting of patients with good sleep quality in the short-term that was maintained throughout the follow-up period; (ii) the MCII group, consisting of patients with poor sleep quality in the short-term, but with improvement over time, ultimately reaching levels comparable to the healthy group; (iii) the non-MCII group, consisting of those with consistently poor sleep quality across the entire follow-up. Further analyses revealed that PSQI score trajectories were closely aligned with those of the HADS and SF-12 mental scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings reveal that a subset of critical illness survivors requires up to 24 months after the acute phase to fully restore their sleep quality, while a significant proportion does not experience a clinically significant improvement in sleep quality over this period. These distinct sleep trajectories are strongly correlated with mental health status, highlighting the importance of addressing sleep alongside mental health within the framework of post-intensive care syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871202/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01449-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Survivors of critical illness endure long-lasting physical and mental challenges. Despite the persistence of poor sleep quality in a considerable proportion of patients at the 12-month follow-up, studies with assessments exceeding this period are limited. We aimed to investigate the trajectory of sleep over the 24 months following critical illness.

Methods: Observational, prospective study. Patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection were recruited during the intensive care unit stay. Evaluations of sleep (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]), mental health (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]), quality of life (12-item Short Form Survey [SF-12]), and other factors were performed in the short-term, and at 12 and 24 months after hospital discharge. Good sleep quality was defined as a PSQI score of ≤ 5. Minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) was defined as a decrease of ≥ 4 points in the PSQI score between the short-term assessment and the 24-month follow-up.

Results: The cohort included 196 patients (69.9% males), with a median [p25;p75] age of 62.0 [53.0;67.2] years. The global population showed a mean (95% CI) change of - 0.91 ( - 1.50 to - 0.31) points in the PSQI score from the short-term assessment to the 24-month follow-up. Based on PSQI score trajectories, three distinct groups of patients were identified: (i) the healthy group, consisting of patients with good sleep quality in the short-term that was maintained throughout the follow-up period; (ii) the MCII group, consisting of patients with poor sleep quality in the short-term, but with improvement over time, ultimately reaching levels comparable to the healthy group; (iii) the non-MCII group, consisting of those with consistently poor sleep quality across the entire follow-up. Further analyses revealed that PSQI score trajectories were closely aligned with those of the HADS and SF-12 mental scores.

Conclusions: Our findings reveal that a subset of critical illness survivors requires up to 24 months after the acute phase to fully restore their sleep quality, while a significant proportion does not experience a clinically significant improvement in sleep quality over this period. These distinct sleep trajectories are strongly correlated with mental health status, highlighting the importance of addressing sleep alongside mental health within the framework of post-intensive care syndrome.

重病后的睡眠轨迹:一项24个月的随访研究。
背景:危重疾病的幸存者承受着长期的身体和精神挑战。尽管在12个月的随访中,相当一部分患者的睡眠质量持续较差,但超过这一时期的评估研究有限。我们的目的是调查危重疾病后24个月的睡眠轨迹。方法:观察性、前瞻性研究。诊断为SARS-CoV-2感染的患者在重症监护病房住院期间招募。在短期、出院后12个月和24个月分别进行睡眠(匹兹堡睡眠质量指数[PSQI])、精神健康(医院焦虑与抑郁量表[HADS])、生活质量(12项简短问卷调查[SF-12])等因素的评估。良好的睡眠质量定义为PSQI评分≤5。最小临床重要改善(MCII)定义为PSQI评分在短期评估和24个月随访期间下降≥4分。结果:该队列纳入196例患者(69.9%为男性),中位年龄[p25;p75]为62.0[53.0;67.2]岁。从短期评估到24个月随访,全球人群PSQI评分的平均(95% CI)变化为- 0.91(- 1.50至- 0.31)点。根据PSQI评分轨迹,确定了三组不同的患者:(i)健康组,由在整个随访期间保持短期良好睡眠质量的患者组成;(ii) MCII组,包括短期睡眠质量较差,但随着时间的推移而改善,最终达到与健康组相当的水平的患者;(iii)非mci组,包括那些在整个随访期间睡眠质量一直很差的人。进一步的分析表明,PSQI得分轨迹与HADS和SF-12心理得分轨迹密切相关。结论:我们的研究结果表明,一部分危重疾病幸存者在急性期后需要长达24个月的时间才能完全恢复睡眠质量,而相当大比例的患者在这段时间内睡眠质量没有临床意义上的显著改善。这些不同的睡眠轨迹与心理健康状况密切相关,强调了在重症监护综合征框架内解决睡眠和心理健康问题的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信