Postoperative pain management for caesarean section in Denmark: A survey of current clinical practice.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anne Juul Wikkelsø
{"title":"Postoperative pain management for caesarean section in Denmark: A survey of current clinical practice.","authors":"Anne Juul Wikkelsø","doi":"10.1111/aas.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative pain relief has a decisive role in recovery and early mother-child bonding. Recent Danish surveys show that 45%-66% of patients experience severe pain following caesarean section. The aim of this survey is to review the standard practice for postoperative pain management currently provided at Danish delivery centres.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A questionnaire of 16 questions was sent to the anaesthetist team in charge of obstetric anaesthesia, aiming to explore local standard care for caesarean section and pain management at the postoperative care unit and at the ward. The answers were received between April 2023 and November 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All Danish centres provided answers (22/22). Only one centre used intrathecal morphine (dose 40 μg) for postoperative pain management combined with a lipophilic opioid and hyperbaric bupivacaine. The same centre used epidural morphine. The rest relied on oral opioids in addition to NSAID and paracetamol. One centre used opioid-free spinal anaesthesia as standard. Five (23%) centres used extended-release morphine for postoperative treatment. No centres used patient-controlled intravenous opioid analgesia. A total of 16 (73%) centres used truncal nerve blocks for 'rescue' treatment, but only 2 (9%) for prophylaxis. Paracetamol treatment was started before or during surgery in 9 (41%) centres. All centres used NSAID as part of the treatment, but at least 7 (32%) centres had 'perioperative blood loss of more than 1-1.5 L' as a contraindication. Large doses of fentanyl or sufentanil were used for caesarean section under general anaesthesia, and 2 (9%) centres used intravenous morphine before extubation. Difficult cases of severe postoperative pain were solved ad hoc between anaesthetists and obstetricians in all centres.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most Danish delivery centres relied on oral morphine in addition to NSAIDs and paracetamol for postoperative pain management following caesarean section. Use of truncal nerve blocks, wound infiltration and extended-release morphine showed many differences between centres. Intrathecal morphine was hardly used despite international recommendations due to the concern of side effects. A national research initiative (www.cepra.nu) will facilitate the evaluation of evidence and treatment options following caesarean section in Denmark.</p><p><strong>Editorial comment: </strong>Using a survey to examine the standard practice for postoperative pain management after caesarean sections in Danish delivery centres, 22 anaesthesia teams responded, reporting the most common postoperative pain management as oral morphine in addition to NSAID and paracetamol. The responses presented variation in local obstetric anaesthetist standard practice. Reporting of intrathecal morphine for post-op analgesia was also noted.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 4","pages":"e70012"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11868978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pain relief has a decisive role in recovery and early mother-child bonding. Recent Danish surveys show that 45%-66% of patients experience severe pain following caesarean section. The aim of this survey is to review the standard practice for postoperative pain management currently provided at Danish delivery centres.

Method: A questionnaire of 16 questions was sent to the anaesthetist team in charge of obstetric anaesthesia, aiming to explore local standard care for caesarean section and pain management at the postoperative care unit and at the ward. The answers were received between April 2023 and November 2023.

Results: All Danish centres provided answers (22/22). Only one centre used intrathecal morphine (dose 40 μg) for postoperative pain management combined with a lipophilic opioid and hyperbaric bupivacaine. The same centre used epidural morphine. The rest relied on oral opioids in addition to NSAID and paracetamol. One centre used opioid-free spinal anaesthesia as standard. Five (23%) centres used extended-release morphine for postoperative treatment. No centres used patient-controlled intravenous opioid analgesia. A total of 16 (73%) centres used truncal nerve blocks for 'rescue' treatment, but only 2 (9%) for prophylaxis. Paracetamol treatment was started before or during surgery in 9 (41%) centres. All centres used NSAID as part of the treatment, but at least 7 (32%) centres had 'perioperative blood loss of more than 1-1.5 L' as a contraindication. Large doses of fentanyl or sufentanil were used for caesarean section under general anaesthesia, and 2 (9%) centres used intravenous morphine before extubation. Difficult cases of severe postoperative pain were solved ad hoc between anaesthetists and obstetricians in all centres.

Conclusion: Most Danish delivery centres relied on oral morphine in addition to NSAIDs and paracetamol for postoperative pain management following caesarean section. Use of truncal nerve blocks, wound infiltration and extended-release morphine showed many differences between centres. Intrathecal morphine was hardly used despite international recommendations due to the concern of side effects. A national research initiative (www.cepra.nu) will facilitate the evaluation of evidence and treatment options following caesarean section in Denmark.

Editorial comment: Using a survey to examine the standard practice for postoperative pain management after caesarean sections in Danish delivery centres, 22 anaesthesia teams responded, reporting the most common postoperative pain management as oral morphine in addition to NSAID and paracetamol. The responses presented variation in local obstetric anaesthetist standard practice. Reporting of intrathecal morphine for post-op analgesia was also noted.

丹麦剖宫产术后疼痛管理:当前临床实践的调查。
背景:术后疼痛缓解对恢复和早期母子关系具有决定性作用。丹麦最近的调查显示,45%-66%的患者在剖腹产后经历了严重的疼痛。本调查的目的是回顾丹麦分娩中心目前提供的术后疼痛管理的标准做法。方法:向负责产科麻醉的麻醉师团队发放一份共16题的问卷,旨在探讨当地标准的剖宫产护理及术后护理单元和病房的疼痛管理。答案是在2023年4月至2023年11月之间收到的。结果:所有丹麦中心都提供了答案(22/22)。只有一个中心使用鞘内吗啡(剂量40 μg)联合亲脂阿片类药物和高压布比卡因进行术后疼痛治疗。同一中心使用硬膜外吗啡。其余的依赖于口服阿片类药物以及非甾体抗炎药和扑热息痛。一个中心使用无阿片类药物的脊髓麻醉作为标准。5个中心(23%)使用缓释吗啡进行术后治疗。没有中心使用病人控制的静脉阿片类镇痛。共有16个(73%)中心使用截骨神经阻滞进行“抢救”治疗,但只有2个(9%)中心用于预防。9个(41%)中心在手术前或手术中开始扑热息痛治疗。所有中心都使用非甾体抗炎药作为治疗的一部分,但至少有7个(32%)中心有“围手术期失血量超过1-1.5升”的禁忌症。剖宫产在全身麻醉下使用大剂量芬太尼或舒芬太尼,2个中心(9%)在拔管前使用静脉注射吗啡。所有中心的麻醉师和产科医生共同解决了术后严重疼痛的疑难病例。结论:大多数丹麦分娩中心除了非甾体抗炎药和扑热息痛外,还依赖口服吗啡来控制剖宫产术后疼痛。各中心使用截骨神经阻滞、伤口浸润和缓释吗啡表现出许多差异。尽管国际上建议使用鞘内吗啡,但由于担心副作用,几乎没有使用。一项国家研究倡议(www.cepra.nu)将促进对丹麦剖腹产后的证据和治疗方案的评估。编辑评论:通过一项调查来检查丹麦分娩中心剖腹产术后疼痛管理的标准做法,22个麻醉小组做出了回应,报告了除非甾体抗炎药和扑热息痛外,最常见的术后疼痛管理是口服吗啡。这些反应反映了当地产科麻醉师标准做法的差异。报告还注意到鞘内吗啡用于术后镇痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信