(Q)SAR Approaches to Predict the Extent of Nitrosation in Pharmaceutical Compounds.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Chemical Research in Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-03-17 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00435
Krystle Reiss, Roustem Saiakhov, Suman Chakravarti
{"title":"(Q)SAR Approaches to Predict the Extent of Nitrosation in Pharmaceutical Compounds.","authors":"Krystle Reiss, Roustem Saiakhov, Suman Chakravarti","doi":"10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since their discovery as impurities in numerous pharmaceuticals beginning in 2018, there has been a strong push to predict and prevent the formation of mutagenic nitrosamines. Several experimental methods, particularly the Nitrosation Assay Procedure, have been developed to predict a molecule's susceptibility to nitrosation. Here, we have compiled the results of hundreds of these experiments from the literature to construct two structure-activity relationship models: a statistical model and an expert rule-based model. The statistical model has been built with graph neural networks and was trained on a dataset of 207 nitrogen-containing molecules. This model makes a binary call for each nitrogen center, predicting if it is likely to be nitrosated or not. Conversely, the rule-based model labels each possible nitrosamine product as one of four categories, ranging from \"unlikely\" to \"very likely\". It makes this determination based on 15 rules, which cover 12 deactivating (inhibit nitrosation) and 3 activating (favor nitrosation) features that have been drawn from the literature. Both models perform remarkably well, with accuracies of ∼80%. The rule-based model is generally biased toward favoring nitrosation while the statistical model is more likely to classify an amine as un-nitrosatable due to the makeup of the dataset. Using the models together can balance these biases and further improve the reliability of both.</p>","PeriodicalId":31,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"433-447"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00435","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since their discovery as impurities in numerous pharmaceuticals beginning in 2018, there has been a strong push to predict and prevent the formation of mutagenic nitrosamines. Several experimental methods, particularly the Nitrosation Assay Procedure, have been developed to predict a molecule's susceptibility to nitrosation. Here, we have compiled the results of hundreds of these experiments from the literature to construct two structure-activity relationship models: a statistical model and an expert rule-based model. The statistical model has been built with graph neural networks and was trained on a dataset of 207 nitrogen-containing molecules. This model makes a binary call for each nitrogen center, predicting if it is likely to be nitrosated or not. Conversely, the rule-based model labels each possible nitrosamine product as one of four categories, ranging from "unlikely" to "very likely". It makes this determination based on 15 rules, which cover 12 deactivating (inhibit nitrosation) and 3 activating (favor nitrosation) features that have been drawn from the literature. Both models perform remarkably well, with accuracies of ∼80%. The rule-based model is generally biased toward favoring nitrosation while the statistical model is more likely to classify an amine as un-nitrosatable due to the makeup of the dataset. Using the models together can balance these biases and further improve the reliability of both.

预测药物化合物亚硝基化程度的 (Q)SAR 方法。
自2018年开始在许多药物中发现亚硝胺作为杂质以来,人们一直在大力推动预测和预防致突变亚硝胺的形成。几种实验方法,特别是亚硝化测定程序,已经发展到预测分子对亚硝化的敏感性。在这里,我们从文献中收集了数百个这样的实验结果,构建了两种结构-活动关系模型:统计模型和基于专家规则的模型。该统计模型是用图神经网络建立的,并在207个含氮分子数据集上进行了训练。该模型对每个氮中心进行二元调用,预测其是否可能发生亚硝化。相反,基于规则的模型将每种可能的亚硝胺产品标记为四类之一,范围从“不太可能”到“非常可能”。它根据15条规则做出了这一决定,这些规则涵盖了从文献中得出的12个失活(抑制亚硝化)和3个激活(有利于亚硝化)特征。这两种模型都表现得非常好,准确率为80%。基于规则的模型通常倾向于支持亚硝化,而统计模型更有可能将胺分类为不可亚硝化,这是由于数据集的组成。同时使用这些模型可以平衡这些偏差,并进一步提高两者的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Research in Toxicology publishes Articles, Rapid Reports, Chemical Profiles, Reviews, Perspectives, Letters to the Editor, and ToxWatch on a wide range of topics in Toxicology that inform a chemical and molecular understanding and capacity to predict biological outcomes on the basis of structures and processes. The overarching goal of activities reported in the Journal are to provide knowledge and innovative approaches needed to promote intelligent solutions for human safety and ecosystem preservation. The journal emphasizes insight concerning mechanisms of toxicity over phenomenological observations. It upholds rigorous chemical, physical and mathematical standards for characterization and application of modern techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信