Dimension Reduction Using Local Principal Components for Regression-Based Multi-SNP Analysis in 1000 Genomes and the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA)

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Fatemeh Yavartanoo, Myriam Brossard, Shelley B. Bull, Andrew D. Paterson, Yun Joo Yoo
{"title":"Dimension Reduction Using Local Principal Components for Regression-Based Multi-SNP Analysis in 1000 Genomes and the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA)","authors":"Fatemeh Yavartanoo,&nbsp;Myriam Brossard,&nbsp;Shelley B. Bull,&nbsp;Andrew D. Paterson,&nbsp;Yun Joo Yoo","doi":"10.1002/gepi.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>For genetic association analysis based on multiple SNP regression of genotypes obtained by dense DNA sequencing or array data imputation, multi-collinearity can be a severe issue causing failure to fit the regression model. In this study, we propose a method of Dimension Reduction using Local Principal Components (DRLPC) which aims to resolve multi-collinearity by removing SNPs under the assumption that the remaining SNPs can capture the effect of a removed SNP due to high linear dependency. This approach to dimension reduction is expected to improve the power of regression-based statistical tests. We apply DRLPC to chromosome 22 SNPs of two data sets, the 1000 Genomes Project (phase 3) and the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA), and calculate variance inflation factors (VIF) in various SNP-sets before and after implementing DRLPC as a metric of collinearity. Notably, DRLPC addresses multi-collinearity by excluding variables with a VIF exceeding a predetermined threshold (VIF = 20), thereby improving applicability for subsequent regression analyses. The number of variables in a final set for regression analysis is reduced to around 20% on average for larger-sized genes, whereas for smaller ones, the proportion is around 48%; suggesting that DRLPC is particularly effective for larger genes. We also compare the power of several multi-SNP statistics constructed for gene-specific analysis to evaluate power gains achieved by DRLPC. In simulation studies based on 100 genes with ≤ 500 SNPs per gene, DRLPC increases the power of the multiple regression Wald test from 60% to around 80%.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12710,"journal":{"name":"Genetic Epidemiology","volume":"49 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetic Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gepi.70005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For genetic association analysis based on multiple SNP regression of genotypes obtained by dense DNA sequencing or array data imputation, multi-collinearity can be a severe issue causing failure to fit the regression model. In this study, we propose a method of Dimension Reduction using Local Principal Components (DRLPC) which aims to resolve multi-collinearity by removing SNPs under the assumption that the remaining SNPs can capture the effect of a removed SNP due to high linear dependency. This approach to dimension reduction is expected to improve the power of regression-based statistical tests. We apply DRLPC to chromosome 22 SNPs of two data sets, the 1000 Genomes Project (phase 3) and the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA), and calculate variance inflation factors (VIF) in various SNP-sets before and after implementing DRLPC as a metric of collinearity. Notably, DRLPC addresses multi-collinearity by excluding variables with a VIF exceeding a predetermined threshold (VIF = 20), thereby improving applicability for subsequent regression analyses. The number of variables in a final set for regression analysis is reduced to around 20% on average for larger-sized genes, whereas for smaller ones, the proportion is around 48%; suggesting that DRLPC is particularly effective for larger genes. We also compare the power of several multi-SNP statistics constructed for gene-specific analysis to evaluate power gains achieved by DRLPC. In simulation studies based on 100 genes with ≤ 500 SNPs per gene, DRLPC increases the power of the multiple regression Wald test from 60% to around 80%.

利用局部主成分降低维度,在 1000 基因组和加拿大老龄化纵向研究 (CLSA) 中进行基于回归的多 SNP 分析
对于基于密集DNA测序或阵列数据输入获得的基因型的多重SNP回归的遗传关联分析,多重共线性可能是导致回归模型无法拟合的严重问题。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种使用局部主成分(DRLPC)的降维方法,该方法旨在通过去除SNPs来解决多重共线性问题,假设剩余的SNPs可以捕获由于高度线性依赖而被去除的SNP的影响。这种降维方法有望提高基于回归的统计检验的能力。我们将DRLPC应用于1000基因组计划(第三阶段)和加拿大老龄化纵向研究(CLSA)两个数据集的22号染色体snp,并计算了实施DRLPC之前和之后不同snp集的方差膨胀因子(VIF)作为共线性的度量。值得注意的是,DRLPC通过排除VIF超过预定阈值(VIF = 20)的变量来解决多重共线性问题,从而提高了后续回归分析的适用性。对于较大的基因,用于回归分析的最后一组变量的数量平均减少到20%左右,而对于较小的基因,这一比例约为48%;这表明DRLPC对较大的基因特别有效。我们还比较了为基因特异性分析构建的几个多snp统计数据的功率,以评估DRLPC获得的功率增益。在基于每个基因≤500个snp的100个基因的模拟研究中,DRLPC将多元回归Wald检验的功率从60%提高到80%左右。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genetic Epidemiology
Genetic Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetic Epidemiology is a peer-reviewed journal for discussion of research on the genetic causes of the distribution of human traits in families and populations. Emphasis is placed on the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors to human disease as revealed by genetic, epidemiological, and biologic investigations. Genetic Epidemiology primarily publishes papers in statistical genetics, a research field that is primarily concerned with development of statistical, bioinformatical, and computational models for analyzing genetic data. Incorporation of underlying biology and population genetics into conceptual models is favored. The Journal seeks original articles comprising either applied research or innovative statistical, mathematical, computational, or genomic methodologies that advance studies in genetic epidemiology. Other types of reports are encouraged, such as letters to the editor, topic reviews, and perspectives from other fields of research that will likely enrich the field of genetic epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信