Phonetic realizations of focus in declarative intonation in Iraqi Arabic

IF 2.4 3区 计算机科学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Muhammad Swaileh A. Alzaidi , Saaed A. Saaed , Mohammad A.S. Bani Younes
{"title":"Phonetic realizations of focus in declarative intonation in Iraqi Arabic","authors":"Muhammad Swaileh A. Alzaidi ,&nbsp;Saaed A. Saaed ,&nbsp;Mohammad A.S. Bani Younes","doi":"10.1016/j.specom.2025.103203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates how both information and contrastive focus in the Iraq Arabic dialect are prosodically realized, contributing to the ongoing debate on focus-marking across languages and within Arabic dialects. Using a question-answer paradigm, we elicited information focus, contrastive focus and neutral-focus in sentence-initial, sentence-penultimate and sentence-final positions. Systematic analyses were done through investigating the continuous <em>f</em><sub>0</sub> trajectories and specific acoustic measurements including maximum <em>f</em><sub>0</sub>, mean <em>f</em><sub>0</sub>, minimum <em>f</em><sub>0</sub>, excursion size, intensity and duration. The results reveal that prosodic patterns are significantly influenced by the type of focus (information focus vs. contrastive focus) and its position within the sentence. Both information and contrastive focus lead to distinct prosodic patterns compared to neutral focus, with specific features being more sensitive to focus type depending on their sentential position. In particular, contrastive focus tends to have a stronger intensity than information focus, especially in sentence-final positions. Additionally, the presence of focus, especially when sentence-initial, significantly reduces the pitch (mean <em>f</em><sub>0</sub> and minimum <em>f</em><sub>0</sub>) and intensity of post-focus words, with contrastive focus having a more pronounced effect on lowering the minimum <em>f</em><sub>0</sub> of subsequent words compared to information focus. The findings further indicate that sentence-penultimate focus generally reduces <em>f</em><sub>0</sub> and duration of pre-focus words more comprehensively, while contrastive focus exerts a stronger influence on <em>f</em><sub>0</sub> reduction in sentence-final positions. These results (a) underscore the nuanced role of focus in shaping the prosodic structure of sentences, (b) demonstrate that PFC occurs in Iraqi Arabic, making it similar to Egyptian, Emirati, Hijazi, Jizani, Lebanese and Najdi Arabic but different from Makkan Arabic. These results have implications for prosodic typology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49485,"journal":{"name":"Speech Communication","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 103203"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Speech Communication","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167639325000184","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates how both information and contrastive focus in the Iraq Arabic dialect are prosodically realized, contributing to the ongoing debate on focus-marking across languages and within Arabic dialects. Using a question-answer paradigm, we elicited information focus, contrastive focus and neutral-focus in sentence-initial, sentence-penultimate and sentence-final positions. Systematic analyses were done through investigating the continuous f0 trajectories and specific acoustic measurements including maximum f0, mean f0, minimum f0, excursion size, intensity and duration. The results reveal that prosodic patterns are significantly influenced by the type of focus (information focus vs. contrastive focus) and its position within the sentence. Both information and contrastive focus lead to distinct prosodic patterns compared to neutral focus, with specific features being more sensitive to focus type depending on their sentential position. In particular, contrastive focus tends to have a stronger intensity than information focus, especially in sentence-final positions. Additionally, the presence of focus, especially when sentence-initial, significantly reduces the pitch (mean f0 and minimum f0) and intensity of post-focus words, with contrastive focus having a more pronounced effect on lowering the minimum f0 of subsequent words compared to information focus. The findings further indicate that sentence-penultimate focus generally reduces f0 and duration of pre-focus words more comprehensively, while contrastive focus exerts a stronger influence on f0 reduction in sentence-final positions. These results (a) underscore the nuanced role of focus in shaping the prosodic structure of sentences, (b) demonstrate that PFC occurs in Iraqi Arabic, making it similar to Egyptian, Emirati, Hijazi, Jizani, Lebanese and Najdi Arabic but different from Makkan Arabic. These results have implications for prosodic typology.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Speech Communication
Speech Communication 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Speech Communication is an interdisciplinary journal whose primary objective is to fulfil the need for the rapid dissemination and thorough discussion of basic and applied research results. The journal''s primary objectives are: • to present a forum for the advancement of human and human-machine speech communication science; • to stimulate cross-fertilization between different fields of this domain; • to contribute towards the rapid and wide diffusion of scientifically sound contributions in this domain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信