Surgical site infection reduction bundle in stoma closure: A retrospective cohort study

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Kentaro Goto , Ryo Matsusue , Kanako Degawa , Akimori Miki , Hiroki Nakanishi , Hiroaki Hata , Masato Narita , Takashi Yamaguchi
{"title":"Surgical site infection reduction bundle in stoma closure: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Kentaro Goto ,&nbsp;Ryo Matsusue ,&nbsp;Kanako Degawa ,&nbsp;Akimori Miki ,&nbsp;Hiroki Nakanishi ,&nbsp;Hiroaki Hata ,&nbsp;Masato Narita ,&nbsp;Takashi Yamaguchi","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2025.100277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Advances in minimally invasive surgeries and pre-operative treatments allow the preservation of anal function through lower anastomosis in patients with rectal cancer, often necessitating temporary diverting stomas owing to the risk of anastomotic leakage. Stoma closure is associated with a high rate of surgical site infections (SSIs). Various measures, including purse-string skin sutures and negative-pressure wound therapy, have been implemented, and some guidelines recommend purse-string skin sutures as the standard method of stoma closure. However, at our institution, we used linear skin closure with an SSI reduction bundle. This study describes our stoma closure method and retrospectively analyses surgical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included patients aged ≥ 20 years who underwent loop stoma closure using linear skin sutures at our institution between January 2006 and March 2021. Our protocol emphasises the following: (1) pre-operative oral anti-microbials, (2) a surgical technique that distinctly separates clean and contaminated regions, and (3) wound closure to eliminate dead space. We evaluated the surgical outcomes, including the incidence of SSIs and other post-operative complications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ninety-two patients (53 men, 39 women; mean age, 59.4 years) underwent loop stoma closure. SSIs occurred in two patients (2.2%). No risk factors for SSIs were identified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In our department, the incidence of SSIs after linear skin closure of stomas was low. Adherence to proper infection prevention practices can effectively mitigate SSIs, even with linear skin closure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262025000063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Advances in minimally invasive surgeries and pre-operative treatments allow the preservation of anal function through lower anastomosis in patients with rectal cancer, often necessitating temporary diverting stomas owing to the risk of anastomotic leakage. Stoma closure is associated with a high rate of surgical site infections (SSIs). Various measures, including purse-string skin sutures and negative-pressure wound therapy, have been implemented, and some guidelines recommend purse-string skin sutures as the standard method of stoma closure. However, at our institution, we used linear skin closure with an SSI reduction bundle. This study describes our stoma closure method and retrospectively analyses surgical outcomes.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study included patients aged ≥ 20 years who underwent loop stoma closure using linear skin sutures at our institution between January 2006 and March 2021. Our protocol emphasises the following: (1) pre-operative oral anti-microbials, (2) a surgical technique that distinctly separates clean and contaminated regions, and (3) wound closure to eliminate dead space. We evaluated the surgical outcomes, including the incidence of SSIs and other post-operative complications.

Results

Ninety-two patients (53 men, 39 women; mean age, 59.4 years) underwent loop stoma closure. SSIs occurred in two patients (2.2%). No risk factors for SSIs were identified.

Conclusion

In our department, the incidence of SSIs after linear skin closure of stomas was low. Adherence to proper infection prevention practices can effectively mitigate SSIs, even with linear skin closure.
造口术中手术部位感染减少束:一项回顾性队列研究
微创手术和术前治疗的进步使得直肠癌患者通过下吻合术保留肛门功能,但由于有吻合口漏的风险,通常需要临时转移口。造口闭合与手术部位感染(ssi)的高发生率相关。各种措施,包括荷包线皮肤缝合和负压伤口治疗,已经实施,一些指南推荐荷包线皮肤缝合作为标准的缝合方法。然而,在我们的机构,我们使用线性皮肤闭合与SSI复位束。本研究描述了我们的造口闭合方法,并回顾性分析了手术结果。材料和方法本回顾性研究纳入了2006年1月至2021年3月期间在我院使用线性皮肤缝合线进行环口闭合的年龄≥20岁的患者。我们的方案强调以下几点:(1)术前口服抗微生物药物,(2)手术技术明确区分清洁和污染区域,(3)伤口闭合以消除死亡空间。我们评估了手术结果,包括ssi的发生率和其他术后并发症。结果92例患者(男53例,女39例;平均年龄59.4岁)行环口闭合术。2例患者发生ssi(2.2%)。未发现ssi的危险因素。结论本科创口线形皮肤闭合术后ssi发生率较低。坚持适当的感染预防措施可以有效地减轻ssi,即使是线性皮肤闭合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信