Suture choice when securing central lines: an update in the light of NICE surgical guidance

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1111/anae.16588
Thomas Lightburn, William Beswick, Usmahn Yasin, David Mayhew
{"title":"Suture choice when securing central lines: an update in the light of NICE surgical guidance","authors":"Thomas Lightburn,&nbsp;William Beswick,&nbsp;Usmahn Yasin,&nbsp;David Mayhew","doi":"10.1111/anae.16588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite substantial advances in care packages to reduce central venous catheter-related blood stream infections, silk sutures are used widely to secure lines. This may be due to the opening on to sets or as part of pre-arranged procurement processes, likely originating from the very easy handling characteristics of a braided silk stitch, and its ability to grip a tube such as a line or drain when tied circumferentially. Surgical practice guidelines, however, suggest that antimicrobial-coated monofilament sutures should be used due to lower surface area and direct antimicrobial effects that lead to lower rates of infection.</p><p>Due to the braided construction, the large surface area of silk sutures predisposes to colonisation and biofilm formation, and the antigenic properties of (animal-derived) silk protein lead to local inflammation [<span>1</span>]. This sloughy tissue can be difficult to discern from early infective changes. These are of limited consequence when securing a drain or vascular access device for a period of hours to a couple of days.</p><p>In surgical wound closure, monofilament antimicrobial-coated sutures have been available for many years. Whilst they are slightly harder to handle, and do not grip well to a structure like a drain, they work perfectly well for securing lines fitted with a collar and suture holes. They require an increased number of throws to guarantee security and must be locked with an appropriate locking knot. Since 2021, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence surgical guidance has been that antimicrobial-coated sutures should be used for all wound closures due to an overall reduction in wound infection rates [<span>2</span>]. We suggest that an antibiotic-coated monofilament should be used instead of a silk stitch to secure vascular access devices anticipated to remain in situ for &gt; 48 h. There are a wide selection of sizes and needle styles available. When tying the knot, such sutures benefit from additional throws beyond the three needed for silk; typically, six for a monofilament. Whilst monofilament is absorbable, it absorbs over several months which does not preclude its use for securing lines. The only additional requirement is training in correct suture tying technique, as the sutures are broadly equivocal in price.</p>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"80 5","pages":"593-594"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anae.16588","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.16588","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite substantial advances in care packages to reduce central venous catheter-related blood stream infections, silk sutures are used widely to secure lines. This may be due to the opening on to sets or as part of pre-arranged procurement processes, likely originating from the very easy handling characteristics of a braided silk stitch, and its ability to grip a tube such as a line or drain when tied circumferentially. Surgical practice guidelines, however, suggest that antimicrobial-coated monofilament sutures should be used due to lower surface area and direct antimicrobial effects that lead to lower rates of infection.

Due to the braided construction, the large surface area of silk sutures predisposes to colonisation and biofilm formation, and the antigenic properties of (animal-derived) silk protein lead to local inflammation [1]. This sloughy tissue can be difficult to discern from early infective changes. These are of limited consequence when securing a drain or vascular access device for a period of hours to a couple of days.

In surgical wound closure, monofilament antimicrobial-coated sutures have been available for many years. Whilst they are slightly harder to handle, and do not grip well to a structure like a drain, they work perfectly well for securing lines fitted with a collar and suture holes. They require an increased number of throws to guarantee security and must be locked with an appropriate locking knot. Since 2021, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence surgical guidance has been that antimicrobial-coated sutures should be used for all wound closures due to an overall reduction in wound infection rates [2]. We suggest that an antibiotic-coated monofilament should be used instead of a silk stitch to secure vascular access devices anticipated to remain in situ for > 48 h. There are a wide selection of sizes and needle styles available. When tying the knot, such sutures benefit from additional throws beyond the three needed for silk; typically, six for a monofilament. Whilst monofilament is absorbable, it absorbs over several months which does not preclude its use for securing lines. The only additional requirement is training in correct suture tying technique, as the sutures are broadly equivocal in price.

固定中心线时缝线的选择:根据NICE手术指南的更新
尽管在减少中心静脉导管相关血流感染的护理套餐方面取得了巨大进步,但丝线缝合仍被广泛用于固定管路。这可能是由于成套设备上的开口或作为预先安排的采购流程的一部分,很可能是由于编织丝线非常易于操作的特点,以及其在周向捆扎时抓紧管路或引流管等管道的能力。然而,手术实践指南建议应使用抗菌涂层单丝缝合线,因为其表面积较小,直接抗菌效果可降低感染率。由于是编织结构,丝线缝合线的表面积较大,容易形成菌落和生物膜,而且(动物来源的)丝蛋白的抗原特性会导致局部发炎[1]。这种脱落的组织很难与早期感染性病变区分开来。在手术伤口缝合中,单丝抗菌涂层缝合线已使用多年。单丝抗菌涂层缝合线在外科伤口缝合中已使用多年,虽然这种缝合线稍难操作,而且不能很好地固定引流管等结构,但在固定带有套环和缝合孔的管路时却非常有效。它们需要增加抛掷次数以确保安全,并且必须使用适当的锁结来锁定。自 2021 年起,美国国家健康与护理卓越研究所的手术指南规定,由于伤口感染率总体下降,所有伤口缝合都应使用抗菌涂层缝合线[2]。我们建议使用抗生素涂层单丝缝合线而不是丝线缝合线来固定预计要在原位保留 48 小时的血管通路装置。在打结时,此类缝合线除了丝线所需的三针外,还需要额外的六针;单丝缝合线通常需要六针。虽然单丝可吸收,但几个月后就会被吸收,这并不妨碍其用于固定缆绳。唯一的额外要求是接受正确缝合技术的培训,因为缝合线的价格大致相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信