Suture choice when securing central lines: an update in the light of NICE surgical guidance

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1111/anae.16588
Thomas Lightburn, William Beswick, Usmahn Yasin, David Mayhew
{"title":"Suture choice when securing central lines: an update in the light of NICE surgical guidance","authors":"Thomas Lightburn, William Beswick, Usmahn Yasin, David Mayhew","doi":"10.1111/anae.16588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite substantial advances in care packages to reduce central venous catheter-related blood stream infections, silk sutures are used widely to secure lines. This may be due to the opening on to sets or as part of pre-arranged procurement processes, likely originating from the very easy handling characteristics of a braided silk stitch, and its ability to grip a tube such as a line or drain when tied circumferentially. Surgical practice guidelines, however, suggest that antimicrobial-coated monofilament sutures should be used due to lower surface area and direct antimicrobial effects that lead to lower rates of infection.</p>\n<p>Due to the braided construction, the large surface area of silk sutures predisposes to colonisation and biofilm formation, and the antigenic properties of (animal-derived) silk protein lead to local inflammation [<span>1</span>]. This sloughy tissue can be difficult to discern from early infective changes. These are of limited consequence when securing a drain or vascular access device for a period of hours to a couple of days.</p>\n<p>In surgical wound closure, monofilament antimicrobial-coated sutures have been available for many years. Whilst they are slightly harder to handle, and do not grip well to a structure like a drain, they work perfectly well for securing lines fitted with a collar and suture holes. They require an increased number of throws to guarantee security and must be locked with an appropriate locking knot. Since 2021, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence surgical guidance has been that antimicrobial-coated sutures should be used for all wound closures due to an overall reduction in wound infection rates [<span>2</span>]. We suggest that an antibiotic-coated monofilament should be used instead of a silk stitch to secure vascular access devices anticipated to remain in situ for &gt; 48 h. There are a wide selection of sizes and needle styles available. When tying the knot, such sutures benefit from additional throws beyond the three needed for silk; typically, six for a monofilament. Whilst monofilament is absorbable, it absorbs over several months which does not preclude its use for securing lines. The only additional requirement is training in correct suture tying technique, as the sutures are broadly equivocal in price.</p>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16588","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite substantial advances in care packages to reduce central venous catheter-related blood stream infections, silk sutures are used widely to secure lines. This may be due to the opening on to sets or as part of pre-arranged procurement processes, likely originating from the very easy handling characteristics of a braided silk stitch, and its ability to grip a tube such as a line or drain when tied circumferentially. Surgical practice guidelines, however, suggest that antimicrobial-coated monofilament sutures should be used due to lower surface area and direct antimicrobial effects that lead to lower rates of infection.

Due to the braided construction, the large surface area of silk sutures predisposes to colonisation and biofilm formation, and the antigenic properties of (animal-derived) silk protein lead to local inflammation [1]. This sloughy tissue can be difficult to discern from early infective changes. These are of limited consequence when securing a drain or vascular access device for a period of hours to a couple of days.

In surgical wound closure, monofilament antimicrobial-coated sutures have been available for many years. Whilst they are slightly harder to handle, and do not grip well to a structure like a drain, they work perfectly well for securing lines fitted with a collar and suture holes. They require an increased number of throws to guarantee security and must be locked with an appropriate locking knot. Since 2021, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence surgical guidance has been that antimicrobial-coated sutures should be used for all wound closures due to an overall reduction in wound infection rates [2]. We suggest that an antibiotic-coated monofilament should be used instead of a silk stitch to secure vascular access devices anticipated to remain in situ for > 48 h. There are a wide selection of sizes and needle styles available. When tying the knot, such sutures benefit from additional throws beyond the three needed for silk; typically, six for a monofilament. Whilst monofilament is absorbable, it absorbs over several months which does not preclude its use for securing lines. The only additional requirement is training in correct suture tying technique, as the sutures are broadly equivocal in price.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信