Mihai-Calin Pavel, Ana Ferre, Lucia Garcia-Huete, Iban Oliva, Lluisa Guillem, Ignacio Tomas, Marcela Renzulli, Rosa Jorba-Martin
{"title":"Preliminary results of the implementation of a Complex Surgical Patient Area as a tool to improve the quality of care.","authors":"Mihai-Calin Pavel, Ana Ferre, Lucia Garcia-Huete, Iban Oliva, Lluisa Guillem, Ignacio Tomas, Marcela Renzulli, Rosa Jorba-Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Given the increasing complexity of surgical patients, their evaluation within a Complex Surgical Patient Area (APQC) is essential. This study aims to present the functioning of the APQC and analyze its outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2022 and 2024, 73 patients were evaluated, with a mean age of 72.8 ± 10 years. Of these, 97.3% were ASA ≥ III, and 41.1% had a Clinical Frailty Score ≥4. The evaluation centered on a multidisciplinary committee responsible for determining the patient's operability and guiding the intrahospital circuit. During postoperative evolution, patient follow-up was carried out by two complementary teams in continuous communication. Failure to Rescue (FTR) was defined as the death of a patient following one or more serious complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main reason for including patients in the CSPA was multimorbidity in 53.4% of cases and a specific pathology in 28.8%. In 31.5% of cases, the intervention was ruled out, with one-year survival below 40%. Among the 35 operated patients, the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) was 18.034 ± 21.94, the average hospital stay was 14.34 ± 20.15 days, and the readmission rate was 25.7%. The FTR rate was 12.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current data suggest a positive impact of the APQC on the evolution of complex patients. A larger patient sample is needed for a detailed analysis of the factors where APQC activities may have the greatest influence.</p>","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cireng.2025.02.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Given the increasing complexity of surgical patients, their evaluation within a Complex Surgical Patient Area (APQC) is essential. This study aims to present the functioning of the APQC and analyze its outcomes.
Methods: Between 2022 and 2024, 73 patients were evaluated, with a mean age of 72.8 ± 10 years. Of these, 97.3% were ASA ≥ III, and 41.1% had a Clinical Frailty Score ≥4. The evaluation centered on a multidisciplinary committee responsible for determining the patient's operability and guiding the intrahospital circuit. During postoperative evolution, patient follow-up was carried out by two complementary teams in continuous communication. Failure to Rescue (FTR) was defined as the death of a patient following one or more serious complications.
Results: The main reason for including patients in the CSPA was multimorbidity in 53.4% of cases and a specific pathology in 28.8%. In 31.5% of cases, the intervention was ruled out, with one-year survival below 40%. Among the 35 operated patients, the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) was 18.034 ± 21.94, the average hospital stay was 14.34 ± 20.15 days, and the readmission rate was 25.7%. The FTR rate was 12.5%.
Conclusions: Current data suggest a positive impact of the APQC on the evolution of complex patients. A larger patient sample is needed for a detailed analysis of the factors where APQC activities may have the greatest influence.