Impact of an Algorithm to Triage Patients Discharged From the Emergency Department With Blood Cultures Positive for Staphylococcus aureus or Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus.

IF 1.6 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Amy Mackowiak, Ethan Brenneman, Thomas Holland, Hui-Jie Lee, Justin Jones, Elizabeth Keil, Jennifer Mando, Rebecca Theophanous, Rachel Toler, Rebekah Moehring, Rebekah Wrenn
{"title":"Impact of an Algorithm to Triage Patients Discharged From the Emergency Department With Blood Cultures Positive for <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> or Coagulase-Negative <i>Staphylococcus</i>.","authors":"Amy Mackowiak, Ethan Brenneman, Thomas Holland, Hui-Jie Lee, Justin Jones, Elizabeth Keil, Jennifer Mando, Rebecca Theophanous, Rachel Toler, Rebekah Moehring, Rebekah Wrenn","doi":"10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Blood cultures obtained in the emergency department (ED) may become positive after discharge. Healthcare professionals must determine if these results represent true infection or a likely contaminant. An institutional algorithm was developed to assist with healthcare professional response to positive blood cultures for <i>S. aureus</i> and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) in these situations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single system, multisite cohort study comparing before and after implementation of an ED decision-making algorithm from November 2022 to December 2023. Adults were included if they were discharged from the ED before blood cultures became positive for <i>Staphylococcus</i> species. The primary outcome was the difference in rates of patients called back to the ED pre- and postalgorithm implementation. Secondary endpoints evaluated algorithm adherence and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 253 patients, 188 pre- and 65 postimplementation, were enrolled. There was a 7.3% reduction in patients called back to the ED after algorithm implementation (95% CI [-21.1 to 6.3], <i>P</i> = .3). Algorithm adherence after implementation was 84.6% with a difference in actual and algorithm-based callback rates of 4.6%. After algorithm implementation, no patients deemed to have a contaminant experienced an infectious-related safety event.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This time-saving algorithm was well received by our ED professionals and served as a helpful tool in safely and effectively triaging patients who had positive blood cultures for <i>Staphylococcus</i> species after discharge to determine who should be called back for further evaluation. There was a nonstatistically significant but clinically meaningful reduction in callback rates. Postimplementation algorithm adherence was high, and the majority of callback decisions were appropriate.</p>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":"6 1","pages":"100010"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11852945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Blood cultures obtained in the emergency department (ED) may become positive after discharge. Healthcare professionals must determine if these results represent true infection or a likely contaminant. An institutional algorithm was developed to assist with healthcare professional response to positive blood cultures for S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) in these situations.

Methods: We conducted a single system, multisite cohort study comparing before and after implementation of an ED decision-making algorithm from November 2022 to December 2023. Adults were included if they were discharged from the ED before blood cultures became positive for Staphylococcus species. The primary outcome was the difference in rates of patients called back to the ED pre- and postalgorithm implementation. Secondary endpoints evaluated algorithm adherence and safety.

Results: A total of 253 patients, 188 pre- and 65 postimplementation, were enrolled. There was a 7.3% reduction in patients called back to the ED after algorithm implementation (95% CI [-21.1 to 6.3], P = .3). Algorithm adherence after implementation was 84.6% with a difference in actual and algorithm-based callback rates of 4.6%. After algorithm implementation, no patients deemed to have a contaminant experienced an infectious-related safety event.

Conclusions: This time-saving algorithm was well received by our ED professionals and served as a helpful tool in safely and effectively triaging patients who had positive blood cultures for Staphylococcus species after discharge to determine who should be called back for further evaluation. There was a nonstatistically significant but clinically meaningful reduction in callback rates. Postimplementation algorithm adherence was high, and the majority of callback decisions were appropriate.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信