Aliya Redd, Rosemarie Fernandez, Diego Maldonado-Puebla, Julia Mortensen, Meredith Thompson, Antionette McFarlane, Colleen Gutman
{"title":"Development of a Framework for the Enrollment of Children and Families in Emergency Department Research.","authors":"Aliya Redd, Rosemarie Fernandez, Diego Maldonado-Puebla, Julia Mortensen, Meredith Thompson, Antionette McFarlane, Colleen Gutman","doi":"10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There remains a need to establish best practices for ethical and inclusive enrollment of children in emergency settings outside of established research networks. We aimed to develop a stakeholder-informed framework for enrolling children and families in emergency department (ED) research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional mixed-methods study using a convergent parallel design. Data collection tools were formulated by a multidisciplinary team. We approached caregivers of pediatric ED patients at a single site to complete a tablet-based questionnaire. We conducted 4-item structured interviews with (1) clinicians in a single pediatric ED and (2) pediatric ED researchers from across the United States. We calculated descriptive statistics for quantitative data and conducted a content analysis of qualitative data. These data were merged to develop a framework to support research recruitment and enrollment in the pediatric ED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire was completed by 225 caregivers (61% response). Caregivers' likelihood of participating in research was high but varied by type of research, perceived importance, and the clinical context. Researchers (n = 11) and clinicians (n = 8) identified barriers to and facilitators of research recruitment in the ED at the caregiver, clinician, and systems level. Merging these data, we developed a framework of 5 principles: (1) high-quality communication is essential; (2) discussions about research participation cannot be coercive; (3) partnership with clinical teams is necessary; (4) research teams must adapt to unpredictability; and (5) participation in research may be viewed as an opportunity by families.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our framework provides key considerations for conducting ED research with children and families.</p>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":"6 1","pages":"100018"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11852677/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: There remains a need to establish best practices for ethical and inclusive enrollment of children in emergency settings outside of established research networks. We aimed to develop a stakeholder-informed framework for enrolling children and families in emergency department (ED) research.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional mixed-methods study using a convergent parallel design. Data collection tools were formulated by a multidisciplinary team. We approached caregivers of pediatric ED patients at a single site to complete a tablet-based questionnaire. We conducted 4-item structured interviews with (1) clinicians in a single pediatric ED and (2) pediatric ED researchers from across the United States. We calculated descriptive statistics for quantitative data and conducted a content analysis of qualitative data. These data were merged to develop a framework to support research recruitment and enrollment in the pediatric ED.
Results: The questionnaire was completed by 225 caregivers (61% response). Caregivers' likelihood of participating in research was high but varied by type of research, perceived importance, and the clinical context. Researchers (n = 11) and clinicians (n = 8) identified barriers to and facilitators of research recruitment in the ED at the caregiver, clinician, and systems level. Merging these data, we developed a framework of 5 principles: (1) high-quality communication is essential; (2) discussions about research participation cannot be coercive; (3) partnership with clinical teams is necessary; (4) research teams must adapt to unpredictability; and (5) participation in research may be viewed as an opportunity by families.
Conclusion: Our framework provides key considerations for conducting ED research with children and families.