Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Among Patients Treated With Intravenous vs Subcutaneous Insulin for Diabetic Ketoacidosis.

IF 1.6 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Richard T Griffey, Ryan M Schneider, Margo Girardi, Gina LaRossa, Julianne Yeary, Michael Lehmkuhl, Dan Suarez, Rachel Ancona, Taylor Kaser, Paulina Cruz-Bravo
{"title":"Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Among Patients Treated With Intravenous vs Subcutaneous Insulin for Diabetic Ketoacidosis.","authors":"Richard T Griffey, Ryan M Schneider, Margo Girardi, Gina LaRossa, Julianne Yeary, Michael Lehmkuhl, Dan Suarez, Rachel Ancona, Taylor Kaser, Paulina Cruz-Bravo","doi":"10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We previously implemented the subcutaneous (SQ) insulin in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) (SQuID) protocol, demonstrating safe, effective treatment of low to moderate (LTM) severity DKA in a non-intensive care unit setting. SQuID replaces intravenous (IV) insulin with SQ injections and reduces glucose checks from hourly to every 2 hours. We are not aware of any data on patient satisfaction with treatment in DKA. Our objective was to compare satisfaction in patients treated with IV insulin to that in patients treated with the SQ protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study in an urban academic hospital (March 2023 to March 2024) of emergency department patients treated for LTM DKA with SQ or IV insulin. Patients were contacted by phone in the hospital after the resolution of DKA. We used the validated 21-item Diabetic Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire-Inpatient tool (DTSQ-IP) using 7-tier Likert-style options (0 = negative; 6 = positive) to assess patient satisfaction with treatment. We computed the DTSQ-IP composite treatment satisfaction score (using 15 of the 21 items), assessing differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 60 patients contacted, 52 (87%) completed the questionnaire. Median DTSQ-IP satisfaction scores for SQuID and IV insulin patients were 86.0 (IQR, 79.0, 88.0) and 81.0 (IQR, 77.0, 88.0), respectively. We found no difference in satisfaction between groups (difference 5.0; 95% CI, -3.0, 10.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this single-center study, patient satisfaction with DKA care was high, with no differences observed between patients treated with SQ vs IV insulin protocols. This is the first study we are aware of on patient satisfaction with treatment in DKA or treatment with SQ insulin. Though the sample size is small, these findings suggest that patient satisfaction should not represent a barrier to the implementation of SQ protocols for LTM severity DKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":"6 1","pages":"100020"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11852661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We previously implemented the subcutaneous (SQ) insulin in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) (SQuID) protocol, demonstrating safe, effective treatment of low to moderate (LTM) severity DKA in a non-intensive care unit setting. SQuID replaces intravenous (IV) insulin with SQ injections and reduces glucose checks from hourly to every 2 hours. We are not aware of any data on patient satisfaction with treatment in DKA. Our objective was to compare satisfaction in patients treated with IV insulin to that in patients treated with the SQ protocol.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in an urban academic hospital (March 2023 to March 2024) of emergency department patients treated for LTM DKA with SQ or IV insulin. Patients were contacted by phone in the hospital after the resolution of DKA. We used the validated 21-item Diabetic Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire-Inpatient tool (DTSQ-IP) using 7-tier Likert-style options (0 = negative; 6 = positive) to assess patient satisfaction with treatment. We computed the DTSQ-IP composite treatment satisfaction score (using 15 of the 21 items), assessing differences between groups.

Results: Of the 60 patients contacted, 52 (87%) completed the questionnaire. Median DTSQ-IP satisfaction scores for SQuID and IV insulin patients were 86.0 (IQR, 79.0, 88.0) and 81.0 (IQR, 77.0, 88.0), respectively. We found no difference in satisfaction between groups (difference 5.0; 95% CI, -3.0, 10.0).

Conclusion: In this single-center study, patient satisfaction with DKA care was high, with no differences observed between patients treated with SQ vs IV insulin protocols. This is the first study we are aware of on patient satisfaction with treatment in DKA or treatment with SQ insulin. Though the sample size is small, these findings suggest that patient satisfaction should not represent a barrier to the implementation of SQ protocols for LTM severity DKA.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信