Kazuyoshi Aoyama, Machiko Furuta, Lieven Ameye, Maria-Alexandra Petre, Marina Englesakis, Mehwish Rana, Nan Gai, Arie Peliowski, Bibek Saha
{"title":"Risk factors for pediatric emergence delirium: a systematic review.","authors":"Kazuyoshi Aoyama, Machiko Furuta, Lieven Ameye, Maria-Alexandra Petre, Marina Englesakis, Mehwish Rana, Nan Gai, Arie Peliowski, Bibek Saha","doi":"10.1007/s12630-024-02889-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Emergence delirium (ED) impacts approximately 25% of pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia and is associated with with concerning consequences, including injury to patients and health care personnel. Risk prediction models with good usability for pediatric ED are lacking. We aimed to identify published risk factors in this systematic review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature search of prospective observational studies and clinical trials through eight major databases from inception to 11 January 2023. We included prospective studies published in English that examined the pediatric population (< 18 yr old) undergoing general anesthesia for any surgical or imaging procedure, that measured the risk factor(s) for ED preoperatively/intraoperatively, and that reported the incidence of ED. We excluded studies investigating therapeutic or prophylactic interventions of ED. We assessed the quality of eligible articles according to a modified version of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network quality checklists and rated them as high, acceptable, or low quality. Risk factors discovered were qualitatively evaluated and synthesized with the following levels of evidence: strong evidence, moderate evidence, inconclusive evidence, or lack of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one studies, comprising a total of 6,068 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The median incidence of ED was 32%. Twelve studies were rated as high quality, 15 as acceptable quality, and the remaining four as low quality. Younger age and agitated/excited induction behaviour with strong evidence, followed by sevoflurane with moderate evidence, were identified as risk factors for pediatric ED. Quantitative synthesis was not feasible as there were no more than two studies that explored the same risk factor with the same cut-off.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although quantitative analyses were not feasible, the current systematic review qualitatively identified three risk factors for pediatric ED with robust evidence.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>PROSPERO ( CRD42020192221 ); first submitted 18 June 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02889-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Emergence delirium (ED) impacts approximately 25% of pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia and is associated with with concerning consequences, including injury to patients and health care personnel. Risk prediction models with good usability for pediatric ED are lacking. We aimed to identify published risk factors in this systematic review.
Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search of prospective observational studies and clinical trials through eight major databases from inception to 11 January 2023. We included prospective studies published in English that examined the pediatric population (< 18 yr old) undergoing general anesthesia for any surgical or imaging procedure, that measured the risk factor(s) for ED preoperatively/intraoperatively, and that reported the incidence of ED. We excluded studies investigating therapeutic or prophylactic interventions of ED. We assessed the quality of eligible articles according to a modified version of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network quality checklists and rated them as high, acceptable, or low quality. Risk factors discovered were qualitatively evaluated and synthesized with the following levels of evidence: strong evidence, moderate evidence, inconclusive evidence, or lack of evidence.
Results: Thirty-one studies, comprising a total of 6,068 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The median incidence of ED was 32%. Twelve studies were rated as high quality, 15 as acceptable quality, and the remaining four as low quality. Younger age and agitated/excited induction behaviour with strong evidence, followed by sevoflurane with moderate evidence, were identified as risk factors for pediatric ED. Quantitative synthesis was not feasible as there were no more than two studies that explored the same risk factor with the same cut-off.
Conclusion: Although quantitative analyses were not feasible, the current systematic review qualitatively identified three risk factors for pediatric ED with robust evidence.
Study registration: PROSPERO ( CRD42020192221 ); first submitted 18 June 2020.
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’
Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the
first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened
considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published
monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article
types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences
articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing
professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content,
according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain,
perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines
and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French,
according to the language of submission.