Around-the-clock: Caregiving at night for juveniles living with type 1 diabetes - a systematic review.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Vivienne Howard, Rebecca Maguire, Enda De Bruin, Jennifer Deane-King, Natalie Duda, Siobhan Corrigan
{"title":"Around-the-clock: Caregiving at night for juveniles living with type 1 diabetes - a systematic review.","authors":"Vivienne Howard, Rebecca Maguire, Enda De Bruin, Jennifer Deane-King, Natalie Duda, Siobhan Corrigan","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2025.2468529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Caring for children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) can require around-the-clock attention but there is little acknowledgment of the impact that nocturnal caregiving can have on caregivers in clinical care provision. This systematic review aimed to (1) explicate nocturnal caregiving practice (NCP) by identifying and synthesising peer-reviewed research to establish the prevalence and nature of NCP, (2) explore the impacts of NCP for caregivers, (3) evaluate the perceived value of technology for supporting NCP, and (4) examine potential solutions for mitigating NCP burden. In January, 2022, the databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus and EMBASE were searched to identify peer-reviewed studies, published in English since 1997, which addressed NCP for juveniles with T1D. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies were included. Risk of bias analysis was carried out using the quality assessment with diverse studies tool. Where possible, quantitative data were aggregated. Qualitative data was subjected to a narrative synthesis, using thematic analysis. Thirty-one studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 3,547 caregivers. 88% of caregivers engaged in NCP, though frequency was variable. Over 50% of participants (19-80%) failed to get adequate sleep and 54% reported poor sleep quality. Qualitative testimony detailed adverse impacts of NCP; exhaustion, difficulty making illness-management decisions, negative impacts on mood and physical health. Benefits from technology were equivocal. Evidence regarding predictors and associations for NCP, such as patient age, was contradictory. 83% of authors recommended that sleep be routinely addressed in clinic, which is not current practice. This review provides clear evidence that NCP in T1D is pervasive with significant negative impacts on caregivers. These secondary impacts of juvenile T1D need to be acknowledged so that care guidelines can be modified and psychosocial supports can be developed for use in clinical treatment environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2468529","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Caring for children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) can require around-the-clock attention but there is little acknowledgment of the impact that nocturnal caregiving can have on caregivers in clinical care provision. This systematic review aimed to (1) explicate nocturnal caregiving practice (NCP) by identifying and synthesising peer-reviewed research to establish the prevalence and nature of NCP, (2) explore the impacts of NCP for caregivers, (3) evaluate the perceived value of technology for supporting NCP, and (4) examine potential solutions for mitigating NCP burden. In January, 2022, the databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus and EMBASE were searched to identify peer-reviewed studies, published in English since 1997, which addressed NCP for juveniles with T1D. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies were included. Risk of bias analysis was carried out using the quality assessment with diverse studies tool. Where possible, quantitative data were aggregated. Qualitative data was subjected to a narrative synthesis, using thematic analysis. Thirty-one studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 3,547 caregivers. 88% of caregivers engaged in NCP, though frequency was variable. Over 50% of participants (19-80%) failed to get adequate sleep and 54% reported poor sleep quality. Qualitative testimony detailed adverse impacts of NCP; exhaustion, difficulty making illness-management decisions, negative impacts on mood and physical health. Benefits from technology were equivocal. Evidence regarding predictors and associations for NCP, such as patient age, was contradictory. 83% of authors recommended that sleep be routinely addressed in clinic, which is not current practice. This review provides clear evidence that NCP in T1D is pervasive with significant negative impacts on caregivers. These secondary impacts of juvenile T1D need to be acknowledged so that care guidelines can be modified and psychosocial supports can be developed for use in clinical treatment environments.

24小时:1型糖尿病青少年夜间看护——一项系统综述。
照顾1型糖尿病儿童(T1D)可能需要全天候的关注,但很少有人认识到夜间护理对临床护理提供的护理人员的影响。本系统综述旨在:(1)通过识别和综合同行评议的研究来阐明夜间护理实践(NCP),以确定NCP的患病率和性质;(2)探讨NCP对护理者的影响;(3)评估支持NCP的技术的感知价值;(4)研究减轻NCP负担的潜在解决方案。2022年1月,检索了CINAHL、MEDLINE、Web of Science、PsycINFO、Scopus和EMBASE数据库,以确定自1997年以来发表的同行评议研究,这些研究涉及T1D青少年的NCP。包括定量、定性和混合方法研究。偏倚风险分析采用多元研究工具进行质量评价。在可能的情况下,汇总了数量数据。定性数据采用主题分析进行叙事综合。31项研究符合纳入标准,包括3,547名护理人员。88%的护理人员参与了NCP,尽管频率是可变的。超过50%的参与者(19-80%)没有得到充足的睡眠,54%的人报告睡眠质量差。定性证词详细说明了新冠肺炎的不利影响;疲惫,难以做出疾病管理决定,对情绪和身体健康产生负面影响。技术带来的好处是模棱两可的。关于NCP的预测因素和关联的证据,如患者年龄,是相互矛盾的。83%的作者建议在临床中定期处理睡眠问题,这不是目前的做法。本综述提供了明确的证据,表明T1D患者的NCP普遍存在,对护理人员有显著的负面影响。需要认识到青少年T1D的这些继发影响,以便修改护理指南,并开发用于临床治疗环境的社会心理支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychology Health & Medicine
Psychology Health & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management. For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信