Clinical prediction model for transition to psychosis in individuals meeting At Risk Mental State criteria.

IF 3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Laura J Bonnett, Alexandra Hunt, Allan Flores, Catrin Tudur Smith, Filippo Varese, Rory Byrne, Heather Law, Marko Milicevic, Rebekah Carney, Sophie Parker, Alison R Yung
{"title":"Clinical prediction model for transition to psychosis in individuals meeting At Risk Mental State criteria.","authors":"Laura J Bonnett, Alexandra Hunt, Allan Flores, Catrin Tudur Smith, Filippo Varese, Rory Byrne, Heather Law, Marko Milicevic, Rebekah Carney, Sophie Parker, Alison R Yung","doi":"10.1038/s41537-025-00582-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The At Risk Mental State (ARMS) (also known as the Ultra or Clinical High Risk) criteria identify individuals at high risk for psychotic disorder. However, there is a need to improve prediction as only about 18% of individuals meeting these criteria develop a psychosis with 12-months. We have developed and internally validated a prediction model using characteristics that could be used in routine practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis, followed by focus groups with clinicians and service users to ensure that identified factors were suitable for routine practice. The model was developed using logistic regression with backwards selection and an individual participant dataset. Model performance was evaluated via discrimination and calibration. Bootstrap resampling was used for internal validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received data from 26 studies contributing 3739 individuals; 2909 from 20 of these studies, of whom 359 developed psychosis, were available for model building. Age, functioning, disorders of thought content, perceptual abnormalities, disorganised speech, antipsychotic medication, cognitive behavioural therapy, depression and negative symptoms were associated with transition to psychosis. The final prediction model included disorders of thought content, disorganised speech and functioning. Discrimination of 0.68 (0.5-1 scale; 1=perfect discrimination) and calibration of 0.91 (0-1 scale; 1=perfect calibration) showed the model had fairly good predictive ability.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The statistically robust prediction model, built using the largest dataset in the field to date, could be used to guide frequency of monitoring and enable rational use of health resources following assessment of external validity and clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":74758,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":"11 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865318/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-025-00582-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The At Risk Mental State (ARMS) (also known as the Ultra or Clinical High Risk) criteria identify individuals at high risk for psychotic disorder. However, there is a need to improve prediction as only about 18% of individuals meeting these criteria develop a psychosis with 12-months. We have developed and internally validated a prediction model using characteristics that could be used in routine practice.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis, followed by focus groups with clinicians and service users to ensure that identified factors were suitable for routine practice. The model was developed using logistic regression with backwards selection and an individual participant dataset. Model performance was evaluated via discrimination and calibration. Bootstrap resampling was used for internal validation.

Results: We received data from 26 studies contributing 3739 individuals; 2909 from 20 of these studies, of whom 359 developed psychosis, were available for model building. Age, functioning, disorders of thought content, perceptual abnormalities, disorganised speech, antipsychotic medication, cognitive behavioural therapy, depression and negative symptoms were associated with transition to psychosis. The final prediction model included disorders of thought content, disorganised speech and functioning. Discrimination of 0.68 (0.5-1 scale; 1=perfect discrimination) and calibration of 0.91 (0-1 scale; 1=perfect calibration) showed the model had fairly good predictive ability.

Discussion: The statistically robust prediction model, built using the largest dataset in the field to date, could be used to guide frequency of monitoring and enable rational use of health resources following assessment of external validity and clinical utility.

符合高危精神状态标准的个体向精神病过渡的临床预测模型。
背景:处于危险的精神状态(ARMS)(也称为超或临床高风险)标准用于识别精神障碍的高风险个体。然而,有必要改进预测,因为只有大约18%符合这些标准的个体在12个月内发展为精神病。我们已经开发并内部验证了一个可以在日常实践中使用的预测模型。方法:我们进行了系统评价和个体参与者数据荟萃分析,随后进行了临床医生和服务用户的焦点小组,以确保确定的因素适合常规实践。该模型是使用逻辑回归与向后选择和个人参与者数据集开发的。通过判别和校准来评估模型的性能。Bootstrap重采样用于内部验证。结果:我们收到了26项研究的数据,共有3739人;其中20项研究中的2909人(其中359人患有精神病)可用于模型构建。年龄、功能、思维内容障碍、知觉异常、言语紊乱、抗精神病药物、认知行为疗法、抑郁和阴性症状与向精神病的过渡有关。最终的预测模型包括思想内容障碍、言语障碍和功能障碍。辨别度0.68(0.5-1量表;1=完全辨别)和校正0.91(0-1刻度;1=完美校准)表明该模型具有较好的预测能力。讨论:利用迄今为止该领域最大的数据集建立的统计稳健预测模型可用于指导监测频率,并在评估外部有效性和临床效用后实现卫生资源的合理使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信