Miriam Kimel, Leah Kleinman, Tobias Di Marco, Antonio Olivieri, Andrea Schulz, Katherine Kirk, Andrea Phillips Beyer
{"title":"Content Validity Assessment of the Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire (IDSIQ) Among Adults with Insomnia and Nocturia.","authors":"Miriam Kimel, Leah Kleinman, Tobias Di Marco, Antonio Olivieri, Andrea Schulz, Katherine Kirk, Andrea Phillips Beyer","doi":"10.1007/s40271-025-00733-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to support use of the Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire (IDSIQ) in clinical trials for patients with concomitant insomnia disorder and nocturia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible participants in this observational study were United States (US) residents aged ≥ 55 years who experienced self-reported symptoms reflecting the diagnostic criteria for insomnia disorder and nocturia (i.e., experienced ≥ 2 nocturnal voids per night within 30 days of screening). Concept elicitation (n = 10), confirmation of limited concepts (n = 5), and cognitive debriefing of the IDSIQ (n = 10) were conducted with 20 participants. A content analysis approach was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants in the overall sample were female (n = 13/20, 65%) and white (n = 17/20, 85%), with a mean age of 60.9 years. Based on concept elicitation, most participants (n = 9/10, 90%) experienced insomnia 5-7 nights per week and nocturia 7 nights per week. Participants identified impacts to their emotions, social activities, physical abilities, cognitive function, daily activities, work, and family for insomnia disorder and nocturia. These concepts were confirmed with the five additional interviews. Concept saturation for both disorders was achieved in all participants by the seventh concept elicitation interview. All cognitive interview participants (n = 10) understood the IDSIQ instructions, items, and response options.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Having concurrent insomnia disorder and nocturia is associated with daytime symptoms and impacts to functioning. All participants who were debriefed understood all IDSIQ items and response options. These findings suggest the IDSIQ is a content-valid instrument for use in clinical trials with patients with insomnia and comorbid nocturia.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-025-00733-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The study aimed to support use of the Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire (IDSIQ) in clinical trials for patients with concomitant insomnia disorder and nocturia.
Methods: Eligible participants in this observational study were United States (US) residents aged ≥ 55 years who experienced self-reported symptoms reflecting the diagnostic criteria for insomnia disorder and nocturia (i.e., experienced ≥ 2 nocturnal voids per night within 30 days of screening). Concept elicitation (n = 10), confirmation of limited concepts (n = 5), and cognitive debriefing of the IDSIQ (n = 10) were conducted with 20 participants. A content analysis approach was used.
Results: Most participants in the overall sample were female (n = 13/20, 65%) and white (n = 17/20, 85%), with a mean age of 60.9 years. Based on concept elicitation, most participants (n = 9/10, 90%) experienced insomnia 5-7 nights per week and nocturia 7 nights per week. Participants identified impacts to their emotions, social activities, physical abilities, cognitive function, daily activities, work, and family for insomnia disorder and nocturia. These concepts were confirmed with the five additional interviews. Concept saturation for both disorders was achieved in all participants by the seventh concept elicitation interview. All cognitive interview participants (n = 10) understood the IDSIQ instructions, items, and response options.
Conclusions: Having concurrent insomnia disorder and nocturia is associated with daytime symptoms and impacts to functioning. All participants who were debriefed understood all IDSIQ items and response options. These findings suggest the IDSIQ is a content-valid instrument for use in clinical trials with patients with insomnia and comorbid nocturia.
期刊介绍:
The Patient provides a venue for scientifically rigorous, timely, and relevant research to promote the development, evaluation and implementation of therapies, technologies, and innovations that will enhance the patient experience. It is an international forum for research that advances and/or applies qualitative or quantitative methods to promote the generation, synthesis, or interpretation of evidence.
The journal has specific interest in receiving original research, reviews and commentaries related to qualitative and mixed methods research, stated-preference methods, patient reported outcomes, and shared decision making.
Advances in regulatory science, patient-focused drug development, patient-centered benefit-risk and health technology assessment will also be considered.
Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in The Patient may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts.