Development and Validation of a Nomogram Predictive Model and Scoring Tool for Assessing the Risk of Inadequate Bowel Preparation in Colonoscopy Patients Over 40 Years Old: A Retrospective Observational Study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Liangyu Fang, Wu Bingbing, Qianmi Wang, Xu Yinchuan
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Nomogram Predictive Model and Scoring Tool for Assessing the Risk of Inadequate Bowel Preparation in Colonoscopy Patients Over 40 Years Old: A Retrospective Observational Study.","authors":"Liangyu Fang, Wu Bingbing, Qianmi Wang, Xu Yinchuan","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore the potential risk factors contributing to inadequate bowel preparation in middle-aged and elderly patients (aged 40 and above) undergoing colonoscopy, and to subsequently devise and validate a comprehensive risk assessment tool and nomogram model for accurately predicting such preparation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted at three campuses from January 2023 to December 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three clinical indicators derived from colonoscopy records were leveraged to inform the predictive models. By using multivariate and stepwise logistic regression analyses, a risk-scoring model and a nomogram prediction model were devised. Calibration curves were used to evaluate the model's accuracy, while decision curve analysis (DCA) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the model's clinical applicability and discriminatory power, encompassing the Hosmer-Lemeshow χ<sup>2</sup> test for goodness-of-fit. TRIPOD was used to guide this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6860 outpatients who met the criteria were selected and divided into a training set (n = 4116) and a validation set (n = 2744) according to the bowel preparation quality. BMI, comorbidity, history of constipation, frailty degree, prescribing doctor's specialty, nonpatient's own prescribing, anxiety level and abdominal surgery history were independent risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation. The corresponding risk scores were 2, 0, 2, 4 3, 3, 2 and 1 respectively; with a total score of ≥ 8.5 classifying patients into a high-risk group. The area under the curve for the training and validation sets were 0.740 and 0.730, respectively, and an optimal critical value threshold of 34%. DCA findings demonstrated that the nomogram model was clinically helpful throughout a broad threshold probability range.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk prediction nomogram model and assessment tool constructed in this study can help clinicians identify individuals at high risk for inadequate bowel preparation at an early stage, which is a guideline for personalised prevention and treatment.</p><p><strong>Trial and protocol registration: </strong>The name of the trial register was outpatient discharge management after general intravenous anaesthesia. The clinical trial registration was 2024-0116, and the link to the trial at the registration website was https://ctms.z2hospital.com:8443/.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) checklist.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Data for this study were provided by 7724 outpatients over 40 years old who underwent their first colonoscopy between January 2023 and December 2023 at three campuses of a medical centre.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17702","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To explore the potential risk factors contributing to inadequate bowel preparation in middle-aged and elderly patients (aged 40 and above) undergoing colonoscopy, and to subsequently devise and validate a comprehensive risk assessment tool and nomogram model for accurately predicting such preparation.

Design: A retrospective observational study was conducted at three campuses from January 2023 to December 2023.

Methods: Twenty-three clinical indicators derived from colonoscopy records were leveraged to inform the predictive models. By using multivariate and stepwise logistic regression analyses, a risk-scoring model and a nomogram prediction model were devised. Calibration curves were used to evaluate the model's accuracy, while decision curve analysis (DCA) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the model's clinical applicability and discriminatory power, encompassing the Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 test for goodness-of-fit. TRIPOD was used to guide this study.

Results: A total of 6860 outpatients who met the criteria were selected and divided into a training set (n = 4116) and a validation set (n = 2744) according to the bowel preparation quality. BMI, comorbidity, history of constipation, frailty degree, prescribing doctor's specialty, nonpatient's own prescribing, anxiety level and abdominal surgery history were independent risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation. The corresponding risk scores were 2, 0, 2, 4 3, 3, 2 and 1 respectively; with a total score of ≥ 8.5 classifying patients into a high-risk group. The area under the curve for the training and validation sets were 0.740 and 0.730, respectively, and an optimal critical value threshold of 34%. DCA findings demonstrated that the nomogram model was clinically helpful throughout a broad threshold probability range.

Conclusions: The risk prediction nomogram model and assessment tool constructed in this study can help clinicians identify individuals at high risk for inadequate bowel preparation at an early stage, which is a guideline for personalised prevention and treatment.

Trial and protocol registration: The name of the trial register was outpatient discharge management after general intravenous anaesthesia. The clinical trial registration was 2024-0116, and the link to the trial at the registration website was https://ctms.z2hospital.com:8443/.

Reporting method: Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) checklist.

Patient or public contribution: Data for this study were provided by 7724 outpatients over 40 years old who underwent their first colonoscopy between January 2023 and December 2023 at three campuses of a medical centre.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信