Time delay and risk of toxicity of intraosseous anaesthesia use for awake intraosseous access in children.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Daniel Pfeiffer, Martin Olivieri, Victoria Lieftüchter, Florian Hey, Florian Hoffmann
{"title":"Time delay and risk of toxicity of intraosseous anaesthesia use for awake intraosseous access in children.","authors":"Daniel Pfeiffer, Martin Olivieri, Victoria Lieftüchter, Florian Hey, Florian Hoffmann","doi":"10.1007/s00063-025-01253-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intraosseous access (IO) is a crucial, life-saving alternative vascular access in paediatric emergency medicine. In awake paediatric patients, the pain of drilling and flushing the marrow cavity are barriers to the use of the IO method or prompt the use of an intraosseous anaesthetic agent, which introduces the risk of dosing errors and drug toxicity. This study aims to identify the frequency of use of anaesthetic agents and analyse the time delay caused by their use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective surveillance study analysing all patients, aged > 28 days to 18 years, who received one or more IO attempt(s) in and out of the hospital setting in Germany from 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2019 via the reporting mechanism of the German Paediatric Surveillance Unit (GPSU).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis identified 74 patients who received an IO attempt while awake. All patients were younger than 6 years old. Almost every third child (31.6%) was awake during IO use. In 18.9% of all awake patients, an intraosseous anaesthetic was used before the IO was drilled or the marrow cavity was flushed, introducing a significant time delay of approximately 3 min (p = 0.001) compared to IO attempts without intraosseous anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraosseous anaesthesia prolongs the establishment of working vascular access in an emergency and introduces the risk of drug toxicity. To prevent adverse events, particular emphasis must be placed on placement without intraosseous anaesthesia, and alternative pain management (intranasal) must be considered if necessary. Training courses and guidelines should reflect the advised current practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":49019,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-025-01253-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intraosseous access (IO) is a crucial, life-saving alternative vascular access in paediatric emergency medicine. In awake paediatric patients, the pain of drilling and flushing the marrow cavity are barriers to the use of the IO method or prompt the use of an intraosseous anaesthetic agent, which introduces the risk of dosing errors and drug toxicity. This study aims to identify the frequency of use of anaesthetic agents and analyse the time delay caused by their use.

Methods: Prospective surveillance study analysing all patients, aged > 28 days to 18 years, who received one or more IO attempt(s) in and out of the hospital setting in Germany from 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2019 via the reporting mechanism of the German Paediatric Surveillance Unit (GPSU).

Results: Our analysis identified 74 patients who received an IO attempt while awake. All patients were younger than 6 years old. Almost every third child (31.6%) was awake during IO use. In 18.9% of all awake patients, an intraosseous anaesthetic was used before the IO was drilled or the marrow cavity was flushed, introducing a significant time delay of approximately 3 min (p = 0.001) compared to IO attempts without intraosseous anaesthesia.

Conclusions: Intraosseous anaesthesia prolongs the establishment of working vascular access in an emergency and introduces the risk of drug toxicity. To prevent adverse events, particular emphasis must be placed on placement without intraosseous anaesthesia, and alternative pain management (intranasal) must be considered if necessary. Training courses and guidelines should reflect the advised current practice.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medizinische Klinik – Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin is an internationally respected interdisciplinary journal. It is intended for physicians, nurses, respiratory and physical therapists active in intensive care and accident/emergency units, but also for internists, anesthesiologists, surgeons, neurologists, and pediatricians with special interest in intensive care medicine. Comprehensive reviews describe the most recent advances in the field of internal medicine with special focus on intensive care problems. Freely submitted original articles present important studies in this discipline and promote scientific exchange, while articles in the category Photo essay feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In the rubric journal club well-respected experts comment on outstanding international publications. Review articles under the rubric "Continuing Medical Education" present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice. The rubrics "Nursing practice" and "Physical therapy" round out the information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信