Anna M Gentile, Caroline O Rogers, Laura M Lesnewich, Shou-En Lu, Wilfred R Pigeon, Drew A Helmer, Lisa M McAndrew
{"title":"The role of the working alliance in improving outcomes among veterans with Gulf War Illness: a longitudinal study.","authors":"Anna M Gentile, Caroline O Rogers, Laura M Lesnewich, Shou-En Lu, Wilfred R Pigeon, Drew A Helmer, Lisa M McAndrew","doi":"10.1007/s10865-024-00540-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Military Veterans with Gulf War Illness (GWI), a \"medically unexplained\" persistent physical syndrome (PPS), have difficult experiences of care, in part, due to non-concordant relationships with their healthcare providers. A critical factor in improving care for this population may be the working alliance, which is the extent to which patients and providers agree on the goals and tasks of treatment and have a shared bond. The present study examined if, for Veterans with GWI, perceptions of the working alliance over time predicted better experiences of care (i.e., patient satisfaction and treatment adherence) and improved health outcomes (i.e., reduced disability, depression symptoms, and physical symptoms). Positive Veteran perceptions of the working alliance at 4 weeks were related to better patient satisfaction and treatment adherence at 12 weeks. Veteran perceptions of the working alliance were not consistently related to reductions in disability, depression symptoms, or physical symptoms. The results of this study suggest that the working alliance is important for improving patient experiences of care but may not be sufficient to consistently impact health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-024-00540-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Military Veterans with Gulf War Illness (GWI), a "medically unexplained" persistent physical syndrome (PPS), have difficult experiences of care, in part, due to non-concordant relationships with their healthcare providers. A critical factor in improving care for this population may be the working alliance, which is the extent to which patients and providers agree on the goals and tasks of treatment and have a shared bond. The present study examined if, for Veterans with GWI, perceptions of the working alliance over time predicted better experiences of care (i.e., patient satisfaction and treatment adherence) and improved health outcomes (i.e., reduced disability, depression symptoms, and physical symptoms). Positive Veteran perceptions of the working alliance at 4 weeks were related to better patient satisfaction and treatment adherence at 12 weeks. Veteran perceptions of the working alliance were not consistently related to reductions in disability, depression symptoms, or physical symptoms. The results of this study suggest that the working alliance is important for improving patient experiences of care but may not be sufficient to consistently impact health outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Behavioral Medicine is a broadly conceived interdisciplinary publication devoted to furthering understanding of physical health and illness through the knowledge, methods, and techniques of behavioral science. A significant function of the journal is the application of this knowledge to prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation and to the promotion of health at the individual, community, and population levels.The content of the journal spans all areas of basic and applied behavioral medicine research, conducted in and informed by all related disciplines including but not limited to: psychology, medicine, the public health sciences, sociology, anthropology, health economics, nursing, and biostatistics. Topics welcomed include but are not limited to: prevention of disease and health promotion; the effects of psychological stress on physical and psychological functioning; sociocultural influences on health and illness; adherence to medical regimens; the study of health related behaviors including tobacco use, substance use, sexual behavior, physical activity, and obesity; health services research; and behavioral factors in the prevention and treatment of somatic disorders. Reports of interdisciplinary approaches to research are particularly welcomed.