Levetiracetam dosing in continuous renal replacement therapy: A systematic review and development of a novel pharmacokinetic model to optimise dosing in critically ill patients. Do recommended doses achieve therapeutic drug concentrations?

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
James Sweatman, Sarraa Al-Mahdi, Dagan O Lonsdale, Susannah Leaver, Andrew Rhodes
{"title":"Levetiracetam dosing in continuous renal replacement therapy: A systematic review and development of a novel pharmacokinetic model to optimise dosing in critically ill patients. Do recommended doses achieve therapeutic drug concentrations?","authors":"James Sweatman, Sarraa Al-Mahdi, Dagan O Lonsdale, Susannah Leaver, Andrew Rhodes","doi":"10.1177/17511437251320557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Levetiracetam is a widely used anti-epileptic in the critical care setting that is almost exclusively (>90%) renally excreted. The altered pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam have been widely studied in intermittent haemodialysis but the evidence and guidance on dosage in continuous renal replacement therapy is varied and poorly defined. Understanding this is critical as a significant number of critically unwell patients develop renal failure requiring continuous renal replacement therapy. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in such patients and to understand the implications on dosing strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the available literature from 2000 to November 2022 was conducted. Seven articles were identified for inclusion from 54 records. A novel hybrid model was developed to evaluate the quality of pharmacokinetic and haemofiltration data. This data was used to develop a one-compartment model that simulated dosing strategies in 10,000 patients based on an assumed steady state of 72 hr and target trough concentrations of 12-46 mcg/mL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the seven articles included, pharmacokinetic data was retrieved for 24 individual patients. Total clearance was 3.49-4.63 L/hr (mean 3.55, S.D. 0.52). Elimination half-life was 5.66-12.88 hr (mean 9.41, S.D. 2.86). Volume of distribution was 0.45-0.73 L/kg. The proportion of total clearance attributable to continuous renal replacement therapy was 52%-73% (mean 54.7%, S.D. 13.5). Our simulations demonstrate that more than half of patients who received twice daily doses of 750 mg or greater without a loading dose achieved therapeutic drug concentrations. The time to achievement of therapeutic drug concentrations was greatly reduced by the addition of a 60 mg/kg loading dose (up to a maximum of 4.5 g). The use of a reduced loading dose or twice daily doses of 500 mg or less without loading were more likely to result in prolonged sub-therapeutic drug concentrations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Levetiracetam clearance in haemofiltration is similar to healthy adults with normal renal function (GFR > 90 mL/min). The use of reduced doses due to renal failure in critically ill patients may result in sub-therapeutic drug concentrations in a high number of patients. A twice daily dosing of 750-1000 mg with an initial loading dose of 60 mg/kg should be considered in such patients alongside therapeutic drug monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"17511437251320557"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11851601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437251320557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Levetiracetam is a widely used anti-epileptic in the critical care setting that is almost exclusively (>90%) renally excreted. The altered pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam have been widely studied in intermittent haemodialysis but the evidence and guidance on dosage in continuous renal replacement therapy is varied and poorly defined. Understanding this is critical as a significant number of critically unwell patients develop renal failure requiring continuous renal replacement therapy. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in such patients and to understand the implications on dosing strategies.

Methods: A systematic review of the available literature from 2000 to November 2022 was conducted. Seven articles were identified for inclusion from 54 records. A novel hybrid model was developed to evaluate the quality of pharmacokinetic and haemofiltration data. This data was used to develop a one-compartment model that simulated dosing strategies in 10,000 patients based on an assumed steady state of 72 hr and target trough concentrations of 12-46 mcg/mL.

Results: From the seven articles included, pharmacokinetic data was retrieved for 24 individual patients. Total clearance was 3.49-4.63 L/hr (mean 3.55, S.D. 0.52). Elimination half-life was 5.66-12.88 hr (mean 9.41, S.D. 2.86). Volume of distribution was 0.45-0.73 L/kg. The proportion of total clearance attributable to continuous renal replacement therapy was 52%-73% (mean 54.7%, S.D. 13.5). Our simulations demonstrate that more than half of patients who received twice daily doses of 750 mg or greater without a loading dose achieved therapeutic drug concentrations. The time to achievement of therapeutic drug concentrations was greatly reduced by the addition of a 60 mg/kg loading dose (up to a maximum of 4.5 g). The use of a reduced loading dose or twice daily doses of 500 mg or less without loading were more likely to result in prolonged sub-therapeutic drug concentrations.

Conclusion: Levetiracetam clearance in haemofiltration is similar to healthy adults with normal renal function (GFR > 90 mL/min). The use of reduced doses due to renal failure in critically ill patients may result in sub-therapeutic drug concentrations in a high number of patients. A twice daily dosing of 750-1000 mg with an initial loading dose of 60 mg/kg should be considered in such patients alongside therapeutic drug monitoring.

左乙拉西坦在持续肾替代治疗中的剂量:一项系统回顾和开发新的药代动力学模型,以优化危重患者的剂量。推荐剂量是否达到治疗药物浓度?
目的:左乙拉西坦是一种广泛应用于重症监护环境的抗癫痫药物,几乎全部(约90%)由肾脏排出。左乙拉西坦在间歇性血液透析中的药代动力学改变已被广泛研究,但持续肾替代治疗剂量的证据和指导各不相同且定义不清。了解这一点是至关重要的,因为大量严重不适的患者发展为肾功能衰竭,需要持续的肾脏替代治疗。本系统综述的目的是研究左乙拉西坦在此类患者中的药代动力学,并了解其给药策略的影响。方法:系统回顾2000年至2022年11月的文献资料。从54条记录中确定了7篇文章纳入。开发了一种新的混合模型来评估药代动力学和血液滤过数据的质量。该数据被用于开发一个单室模型,该模型模拟了10,000名患者的给药策略,该模型基于假设的72小时稳定状态和12-46微克/毫升的目标谷浓度。结果:从纳入的7篇文章中,检索到24例患者的药代动力学数据。总清除率为3.49-4.63 L/hr(平均3.55,标准差0.52)。消除半衰期为5.66 ~ 12.88小时(平均9.41小时,标准差2.86)。分布体积为0.45 ~ 0.73 L/kg。持续肾替代治疗导致的总清除率为52%-73%(平均54.7%,标准差13.5)。我们的模拟表明,超过一半的患者每天接受两次750毫克或更大剂量的无负荷剂量,达到治疗药物浓度。通过增加60mg /kg的负荷剂量(最多可达4.5 g),达到治疗药物浓度的时间大大缩短。减少负荷剂量或每日两次500mg或更少剂量而不负荷更有可能导致亚治疗药物浓度延长。结论:左乙拉西坦血液滤过清除率与肾功能正常的健康成人相似(GFR bb0 90 mL/min)。危重患者由于肾功能衰竭而减少剂量的使用可能导致大量患者的药物浓度低于治疗水平。在治疗药物监测的同时,应考虑每日两次给药750- 1000mg,初始负荷剂量为60mg /kg。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Nursing-Critical Care Nursing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信