{"title":"Investigating the role of immunotherapy for real-world patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer between 2011 and 2023.","authors":"Keitaro Shimozaki, Akira Ooki, Koichiro Yoshino, Mikako Tamba, Shohei Udagawa, Hiroki Osumi, Shota Fukuoka, Izuma Nakayama, Takeru Wakatsuki, Mariko Ogura, Daisuke Takahari, Eiji Shinozaki, Keisho Chin, Kensei Yamaguchi","doi":"10.1177/17588359251322670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the emergence of immunotherapy has benefited patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC), the magnitude of the benefit among real-world patients with HER2-negative AGC remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The current study aimed to evaluate the treatment features across various immunotherapy approval periods and investigate the utility of immunotherapy for patients with HER2-negative AGC in daily practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients with HER2-negative AGC who received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy between 2011 and 2023 across different periods of immunotherapy approval in Japan: Group A (pre-immunotherapy approval): 2011-2017; Group B (approved for third-line treatment or later): 2018-2021; and Group C (approved for first-line treatment): 2022-2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 949 patients were enrolled (<i>n</i> = 477, 344, and 128 for Groups A, B, and C, respectively). Patient characteristics were comparable between the three groups, except for the proportion of those aged ⩾75 years (<i>p</i> = 0.002), prior gastrectomy (<i>p</i> = 0.03), and liver metastases (<i>p</i> = 0.0005). The median overall survival (OS) was 16.2, 15.2, and 21.3 months in Groups A, B, and C, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.50). Patients who received first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (<i>n</i> = 173) showed significantly better OS than did those who did not receive any immunotherapy-containing treatment from 2011 to 2017 (<i>n</i> = 382; hazard ratio (HR), 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.61-0.99; <i>p</i> = 0.04). Multivariate analysis showed that the use of first-line immunotherapy was not significantly associated with worse OS, whereas the use of any-line immunotherapy was significantly associated with prognosis (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.47-0.63; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). The proportion of patients receiving any second-line treatment was comparable between the groups: 76%, 80%, and 71%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests that immunotherapy has a moderate impact on improving the survival of real-world patients with HER2-negative AGC, highlighting the need for appropriate treatment strategies, including efforts to identify biomarkers and the development of other agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17588359251322670"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359251322670","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Although the emergence of immunotherapy has benefited patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC), the magnitude of the benefit among real-world patients with HER2-negative AGC remains unclear.
Objectives: The current study aimed to evaluate the treatment features across various immunotherapy approval periods and investigate the utility of immunotherapy for patients with HER2-negative AGC in daily practice.
Design: Retrospective observational study.
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients with HER2-negative AGC who received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy between 2011 and 2023 across different periods of immunotherapy approval in Japan: Group A (pre-immunotherapy approval): 2011-2017; Group B (approved for third-line treatment or later): 2018-2021; and Group C (approved for first-line treatment): 2022-2023.
Results: A total of 949 patients were enrolled (n = 477, 344, and 128 for Groups A, B, and C, respectively). Patient characteristics were comparable between the three groups, except for the proportion of those aged ⩾75 years (p = 0.002), prior gastrectomy (p = 0.03), and liver metastases (p = 0.0005). The median overall survival (OS) was 16.2, 15.2, and 21.3 months in Groups A, B, and C, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups (log-rank p = 0.50). Patients who received first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (n = 173) showed significantly better OS than did those who did not receive any immunotherapy-containing treatment from 2011 to 2017 (n = 382; hazard ratio (HR), 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.61-0.99; p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis showed that the use of first-line immunotherapy was not significantly associated with worse OS, whereas the use of any-line immunotherapy was significantly associated with prognosis (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.47-0.63; p < 0.0001). The proportion of patients receiving any second-line treatment was comparable between the groups: 76%, 80%, and 71%, respectively.
Conclusion: Our study suggests that immunotherapy has a moderate impact on improving the survival of real-world patients with HER2-negative AGC, highlighting the need for appropriate treatment strategies, including efforts to identify biomarkers and the development of other agents.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of cancer. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in medical oncology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).