Unidirectional airflow, air sacs or the horizontal septum: what does it take to make a bird lung?

IF 5.4 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Emma R Schachner, Andrew J Moore
{"title":"Unidirectional airflow, air sacs or the horizontal septum: what does it take to make a bird lung?","authors":"Emma R Schachner, Andrew J Moore","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2023.0418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this review, we evaluate the differences between the pulmonary anatomy of birds and other sauropsids, specifically those traits that make the avian respiratory system distinct: a fully decoupled and immobilized, isovolumetric gas-exchanging lung separated from compliant ventilatory air sacs by a horizontal septum. Imaging data, three-dimensional digital anatomical models and dissection images from a red-tailed hawk (<i>Buteo jamaicensis</i>), common ostrich (<i>Struthio camelus</i>), barred owl (<i>Strix varia</i>), African grey parrot (<i>Psittacus erithacus</i>) and zebra finch (<i>Taeniopygia castanotis</i>) are used to demonstrate the anatomical variation seen in the pulmonary air sacs, diverticula and the horizontal septum. We address the current state of knowledge regarding the avian respiratory system and the myriad areas that require further study, including the comparative and quantitative ecomorphology of the bronchial tree and air sacs, the non-ventilatory functions of the sacs and diverticula, the fluid dynamics and anatomical mechanisms underlying unidirectional airflow, post-cranial skeletal pneumaticity, and how all of these factors impact reconstructions of respiratory tissues in extinct archosaurs, particularly ornithodirans (i.e. pterosaurs + non-avian dinosaurs). Specifically, we argue that without evidence for the horizontal septum, a fully avian lung should not be reconstructed in non-avian ornithodirans, despite the presence of post-cranial skeletal pneumaticity.This article is part of the theme issue 'The biology of the avian respiratory system'.</p>","PeriodicalId":19872,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","volume":"380 1920","pages":"20230418"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0418","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this review, we evaluate the differences between the pulmonary anatomy of birds and other sauropsids, specifically those traits that make the avian respiratory system distinct: a fully decoupled and immobilized, isovolumetric gas-exchanging lung separated from compliant ventilatory air sacs by a horizontal septum. Imaging data, three-dimensional digital anatomical models and dissection images from a red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), common ostrich (Struthio camelus), barred owl (Strix varia), African grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus) and zebra finch (Taeniopygia castanotis) are used to demonstrate the anatomical variation seen in the pulmonary air sacs, diverticula and the horizontal septum. We address the current state of knowledge regarding the avian respiratory system and the myriad areas that require further study, including the comparative and quantitative ecomorphology of the bronchial tree and air sacs, the non-ventilatory functions of the sacs and diverticula, the fluid dynamics and anatomical mechanisms underlying unidirectional airflow, post-cranial skeletal pneumaticity, and how all of these factors impact reconstructions of respiratory tissues in extinct archosaurs, particularly ornithodirans (i.e. pterosaurs + non-avian dinosaurs). Specifically, we argue that without evidence for the horizontal septum, a fully avian lung should not be reconstructed in non-avian ornithodirans, despite the presence of post-cranial skeletal pneumaticity.This article is part of the theme issue 'The biology of the avian respiratory system'.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
1.60%
发文量
365
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal publishes topics across the life sciences. As long as the core subject lies within the biological sciences, some issues may also include content crossing into other areas such as the physical sciences, social sciences, biophysics, policy, economics etc. Issues generally sit within four broad areas (although many issues sit across these areas): Organismal, environmental and evolutionary biology Neuroscience and cognition Cellular, molecular and developmental biology Health and disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信