Cognitive Authority Theory: Reframing health inequity, disadvantage and privilege in palliative and end-of-life care.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1177/02692163251321713
Katherine J Hunt, Carl R May
{"title":"Cognitive Authority Theory: Reframing health inequity, disadvantage and privilege in palliative and end-of-life care.","authors":"Katherine J Hunt, Carl R May","doi":"10.1177/02692163251321713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There persist disparities in access to quality palliative and end-of-life care, often based on avoidable injustice. Research and theory to explain this health inequity focuses on structural or individual-based factors, overlooking important relational factors between health professionals, patients and families.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To apply Cognitive Authority Theory in palliative and end-of-life care to explain neglected relational drivers of inequity in access and experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cognitive Authority Theory, a middle-range theory of power relations between individuals and authority over knowledge, was developed from empirical and review data. This paper demonstrates its utility in explaining an overlooked component of inequity in palliative care: interactions between health professionals and patients/caregivers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using examples from the palliative care literature, we characterise how people who are socially disadvantaged have fewer resources to exploit during consultations with health professionals which makes it difficult for them to have their voices heard, their choices prioritised by others, and to express their expertise. We examine the implications of health professionals' judgements of expertise for care access, experience, involvement and appropriateness. We offer a fresh perspective on the mechanisms by which stereotypes, bias and power imbalances between health professionals and patients reinforce existing health inequities, drawing on the role of social privilege in shaping inequity in palliative care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This paper provides a new language to articulate relational drivers of inequity in palliative care. It explains how to use Cognitive Authority Theory to design and interpret research to determine how healthcare interactions reinforce both social privilege and social disadvantage at end-of-life.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"448-459"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163251321713","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There persist disparities in access to quality palliative and end-of-life care, often based on avoidable injustice. Research and theory to explain this health inequity focuses on structural or individual-based factors, overlooking important relational factors between health professionals, patients and families.

Aim: To apply Cognitive Authority Theory in palliative and end-of-life care to explain neglected relational drivers of inequity in access and experience.

Methods: Cognitive Authority Theory, a middle-range theory of power relations between individuals and authority over knowledge, was developed from empirical and review data. This paper demonstrates its utility in explaining an overlooked component of inequity in palliative care: interactions between health professionals and patients/caregivers.

Results: Using examples from the palliative care literature, we characterise how people who are socially disadvantaged have fewer resources to exploit during consultations with health professionals which makes it difficult for them to have their voices heard, their choices prioritised by others, and to express their expertise. We examine the implications of health professionals' judgements of expertise for care access, experience, involvement and appropriateness. We offer a fresh perspective on the mechanisms by which stereotypes, bias and power imbalances between health professionals and patients reinforce existing health inequities, drawing on the role of social privilege in shaping inequity in palliative care.

Conclusion: This paper provides a new language to articulate relational drivers of inequity in palliative care. It explains how to use Cognitive Authority Theory to design and interpret research to determine how healthcare interactions reinforce both social privilege and social disadvantage at end-of-life.

认知权威理论:在姑息治疗和临终关怀中重构健康不平等、劣势和特权。
背景:在获得高质量的姑息治疗和临终关怀方面,存在着持续的差异,往往是基于可避免的不公正。解释这种健康不平等的研究和理论侧重于结构性或基于个人的因素,忽视了卫生专业人员、患者和家庭之间的重要关系因素。目的:应用认知权威理论在姑息治疗和临终关怀中解释被忽视的不平等的关系驱动因素。方法:认知权威理论是一种研究个人权力关系与知识权威关系的中庸理论。本文展示了其在解释姑息治疗不平等的一个被忽视的组成部分的效用:卫生专业人员和患者/护理人员之间的相互作用。结果:使用姑息治疗文献中的例子,我们描述了社会弱势群体在与卫生专业人员协商时如何利用更少的资源,这使得他们难以发出自己的声音,他们的选择被他人优先考虑,并表达他们的专业知识。我们研究卫生专业人员的专业知识判断的影响,护理获取,经验,参与和适当性。我们对卫生专业人员和患者之间的陈规定型观念、偏见和权力不平衡加剧现有卫生不平等的机制提供了新的视角,并借鉴了社会特权在形成姑息治疗不平等方面的作用。结论:本文提供了一种新的语言来阐明姑息治疗中不公平的关系驱动因素。它解释了如何使用认知权威理论来设计和解释研究,以确定医疗保健互动如何在生命结束时加强社会特权和社会劣势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信