Children's Emergency Department Provider Experiences With Lethal Means Restriction Counseling and Firearm Access.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Arielle Shibi Rosen, Kirsten Bechtel
{"title":"Children's Emergency Department Provider Experiences With Lethal Means Restriction Counseling and Firearm Access.","authors":"Arielle Shibi Rosen, Kirsten Bechtel","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assessing firearm access and providing lethal means restriction counseling (LMRC) is paramount for harm reduction, but evidence indicates that it is not commonly provided by Children's Emergency Department (ED) providers. This study aimed to explore provider perspectives and determine avenues to increase discharge safety for patients with behavioral health emergencies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-nine Children's ED providers completed semistructured interviews which were recorded, transcribed, iteratively coded, and organized into themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified the following 5 themes: (1) Children's ED providers have varying experiences with firearms which could influence their clinical practices. (2) Most providers expressed knowledge of LMRC as a necessary component of safety planning for behavioral health patients. (3) The role of medical providers is commonly assumed to be only in medical clearance, with LMRC falling to social workers and psychiatrists. (4) Many Children's ED providers seem to underestimate the gravity of risk associated with firearm access for children with behavioral health complaints. (5) Training and resources could help facilitate effective LMRC and support caregiver implementation of firearm secure storage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite a wide range of perspectives and barriers that prevent the consistent provision of LMRC, we saw that providers are amenable to interventions to increase comfort, consistency, and efficacy of safety planning. Understanding these perspectives can inform future initiatives for comprehensive LMRC that include firearm secure storage and address this crucial gap in care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003363","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Assessing firearm access and providing lethal means restriction counseling (LMRC) is paramount for harm reduction, but evidence indicates that it is not commonly provided by Children's Emergency Department (ED) providers. This study aimed to explore provider perspectives and determine avenues to increase discharge safety for patients with behavioral health emergencies.

Methods: Twenty-nine Children's ED providers completed semistructured interviews which were recorded, transcribed, iteratively coded, and organized into themes.

Results: We identified the following 5 themes: (1) Children's ED providers have varying experiences with firearms which could influence their clinical practices. (2) Most providers expressed knowledge of LMRC as a necessary component of safety planning for behavioral health patients. (3) The role of medical providers is commonly assumed to be only in medical clearance, with LMRC falling to social workers and psychiatrists. (4) Many Children's ED providers seem to underestimate the gravity of risk associated with firearm access for children with behavioral health complaints. (5) Training and resources could help facilitate effective LMRC and support caregiver implementation of firearm secure storage.

Conclusions: Despite a wide range of perspectives and barriers that prevent the consistent provision of LMRC, we saw that providers are amenable to interventions to increase comfort, consistency, and efficacy of safety planning. Understanding these perspectives can inform future initiatives for comprehensive LMRC that include firearm secure storage and address this crucial gap in care.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信