Electrical impedance tomography for PEEP titration in ARDS patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Carlos Sanchez-Piedra, Begoña Rodríguez-Ortiz-de-Salazar, Oriol Roca, Francisco-Javier Prado-Galbarro, Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez, Luis-Maria Sanchez-Gomez
{"title":"Electrical impedance tomography for PEEP titration in ARDS patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Carlos Sanchez-Piedra, Begoña Rodríguez-Ortiz-de-Salazar, Oriol Roca, Francisco-Javier Prado-Galbarro, Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez, Luis-Maria Sanchez-Gomez","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01266-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To assess the efficacy of electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-guided positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration in improving outcomes for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies with a control group comparing EIT-guided PEEP titration to other strategies were included. Endpoints analysed included mortality, days of mechanical ventilation (MV), intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), weaning success rate, barotrauma, driving pressure (∆P), mechanical power (MP), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and adverse events. Pooled results were presented as Risk Ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and standardized difference in means (SMD) for continuous outcomes. A total of 4 studies were identified (3 randomized controlled trials and one observational study). All studies were single-center studies (N total = 271 patients). The main limitations were related to potential bias in selecting reported outcomes. EIT-guided PEEP titration was associated with a significant reduction in mortality among critically ill patients with ARDS (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.45-0.91). No significant differences were found in other outcomes. Our findings suggest that EIT may be a valuable tool for PEEP titration in critically ill patients with ARDS. By optimizing lung mechanics, EIT-guided PEEP titration may potentially reduce mortality rates. While larger, multicenter studies are needed to definitively establish the clinical role of EIT in ARDS management, our results provide promising evidence for its potential clinical impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01266-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To assess the efficacy of electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-guided positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration in improving outcomes for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies with a control group comparing EIT-guided PEEP titration to other strategies were included. Endpoints analysed included mortality, days of mechanical ventilation (MV), intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), weaning success rate, barotrauma, driving pressure (∆P), mechanical power (MP), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and adverse events. Pooled results were presented as Risk Ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and standardized difference in means (SMD) for continuous outcomes. A total of 4 studies were identified (3 randomized controlled trials and one observational study). All studies were single-center studies (N total = 271 patients). The main limitations were related to potential bias in selecting reported outcomes. EIT-guided PEEP titration was associated with a significant reduction in mortality among critically ill patients with ARDS (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.45-0.91). No significant differences were found in other outcomes. Our findings suggest that EIT may be a valuable tool for PEEP titration in critically ill patients with ARDS. By optimizing lung mechanics, EIT-guided PEEP titration may potentially reduce mortality rates. While larger, multicenter studies are needed to definitively establish the clinical role of EIT in ARDS management, our results provide promising evidence for its potential clinical impact.

电阻抗断层扫描用于ARDS患者PEEP滴定:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:评价电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)引导下呼气末正压(PEEP)滴定法改善急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者预后的效果。按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。包括随机对照试验和对照组比较eit引导的PEEP滴定与其他策略的观察性研究。分析的终点包括死亡率、机械通气天数(MV)、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(LOS)、脱机成功率、气压损伤、驱动压力(∆P)、机械功率(MP)、顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分和不良事件。合并结果以风险比(RR)表示二分类结果,以标准化均数差(SMD)表示连续结局。共纳入4项研究(3项随机对照试验和1项观察性研究)。所有研究均为单中心研究(N总= 271例患者)。主要的限制与选择报告结果的潜在偏倚有关。eit引导下的PEEP滴定与急性呼吸窘迫综合征危重患者死亡率显著降低相关(RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.45-0.91)。其他结果无显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,EIT可能是危重ARDS患者呼气末正压滴定的一个有价值的工具。通过优化肺力学,eit引导的PEEP滴定可能潜在地降低死亡率。虽然需要更大规模的多中心研究来确定EIT在ARDS治疗中的临床作用,但我们的研究结果为其潜在的临床影响提供了有希望的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信