Stroke etiology was associated with tirofiban efficacy in acute ischemic stroke without endovascular treatment: A pre-specified subgroup analysis of the TREND trial.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yue Qiao, Min Zhao, Jing Wang, Sijie Li, Ting Yang, Pingping Wang, Xunming Ji, Qingfeng Ma, Wenbo Zhao
{"title":"Stroke etiology was associated with tirofiban efficacy in acute ischemic stroke without endovascular treatment: A pre-specified subgroup analysis of the TREND trial.","authors":"Yue Qiao, Min Zhao, Jing Wang, Sijie Li, Ting Yang, Pingping Wang, Xunming Ji, Qingfeng Ma, Wenbo Zhao","doi":"10.1177/17474930251326423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different stroke etiologies are associated with varied incidences of early neurological deterioration (END) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The Tirofiban for the Prevention of Neurological Deterioration in Acute Ischemic Stroke (TREND) trial demonstrated the efficacy of tirofiban in preventing END in patients with AIS. Herein, we conducted a pre-specified subgroup analysis of this trial data to investigate whether stroke etiologies influenced the effects of tirofiban.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a pre-specified subgroup analysis of the TREND trial, including 413 patients with AIS classified into large-artery atherosclerosis (n = 114), small-vessel occlusion (n = 124), and undetermined etiology (n = 175). The primary outcome was the incidence of END<sub>4</sub> (defined as an increase in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score by ⩾ 4 points) within 72 h. Other outcomes included END<sub>2</sub> (increase in NIHSS score by ⩾ 2 points), early improvement, functional outcomes at 90 days, and safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tirofiban significantly reduced the risk of END<sub>4</sub> in patients with large-artery atherosclerosis (4.1% vs. 21.5%; adjusted odds ratio (OR), 0.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.04-0.78; P = 0.023), while no significant differences were observed in small-vessel occlusion (adjusted OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.02-2.67; P = 0.248) and undetermined etiology (adjusted OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.18-1.55; P = 0.247) subgroups (P for interaction = 0.376). Similar trends were observed for END<sub>2</sub>, with a significant benefit observed in the large-artery atherosclerosis (adjusted OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.08-0.72; P = 0.011). The early improvement rates and 90-day functional outcomes were comparable between the treatment groups across all stroke subtypes. Safety outcomes were similar between antiplatelet therapies in each subgroup.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients who developed ischemic stroke within 24 h of symptom onset, there was no evidence of a treatment interaction across stroke etiologies when comparing intravenous tirofiban to oral aspirin for reducing END. However, the absolute risk reduction observed with tirofiban was greatest in patients with large-artery atherosclerosis compared with those with small-vessel occlusion or undetermined etiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"17474930251326423"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930251326423","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Different stroke etiologies are associated with varied incidences of early neurological deterioration (END) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The Tirofiban for the Prevention of Neurological Deterioration in Acute Ischemic Stroke (TREND) trial demonstrated the efficacy of tirofiban in preventing END in patients with AIS. Herein, we conducted a pre-specified subgroup analysis of this trial data to investigate whether stroke etiologies influenced the effects of tirofiban.

Methods: We performed a pre-specified subgroup analysis of the TREND trial, including 413 patients with AIS classified into large-artery atherosclerosis (n = 114), small-vessel occlusion (n = 124), and undetermined etiology (n = 175). The primary outcome was the incidence of END4 (defined as an increase in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score by ⩾ 4 points) within 72 h. Other outcomes included END2 (increase in NIHSS score by ⩾ 2 points), early improvement, functional outcomes at 90 days, and safety profiles.

Results: Tirofiban significantly reduced the risk of END4 in patients with large-artery atherosclerosis (4.1% vs. 21.5%; adjusted odds ratio (OR), 0.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.04-0.78; P = 0.023), while no significant differences were observed in small-vessel occlusion (adjusted OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.02-2.67; P = 0.248) and undetermined etiology (adjusted OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.18-1.55; P = 0.247) subgroups (P for interaction = 0.376). Similar trends were observed for END2, with a significant benefit observed in the large-artery atherosclerosis (adjusted OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.08-0.72; P = 0.011). The early improvement rates and 90-day functional outcomes were comparable between the treatment groups across all stroke subtypes. Safety outcomes were similar between antiplatelet therapies in each subgroup.

Conclusions: In patients who developed ischemic stroke within 24 h of symptom onset, there was no evidence of a treatment interaction across stroke etiologies when comparing intravenous tirofiban to oral aspirin for reducing END. However, the absolute risk reduction observed with tirofiban was greatest in patients with large-artery atherosclerosis compared with those with small-vessel occlusion or undetermined etiology.

背景:不同的卒中病因与急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者早期神经功能恶化(END)的不同发生率有关。TREND 试验证明了替罗非班预防 AIS 患者 END 的疗效。在此,我们对该试验数据进行了预先指定的亚组分析,以研究卒中病因是否会影响替罗非班的效果:我们对 TREND 试验进行了预先指定的亚组分析,包括 413 例 AIS 患者,分为大动脉粥样硬化(114 例)、小血管闭塞(124 例)和病因未定(175 例)。主要结果是72小时内END4(定义为美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分增加≥4分)的发生率。其他结果包括END2(NIHSS评分增加≥2分)、早期改善、90天的功能结果和安全性:结果:替罗非班明显降低了大动脉粥样硬化患者END4的风险(4.1% vs. 21.5%;调整后OR 0.17;95% CI 0.04-0.78;P=0.023),而在小血管闭塞(调整 OR,0.24;95% CI,0.02-2.67;P=0.248)和病因未定(调整 OR,0.53;95% CI,0.18-1.55;P=0.247)亚组中未观察到明显差异(交互作用 P=0.376)。END2也观察到类似的趋势,在大动脉粥样硬化中观察到显著的获益(调整后OR为0.24;95% CI为0.08-0.72;P=0.011)。在所有中风亚型中,治疗组之间的早期改善率和90天功能预后相当。各亚组抗血小板疗法的安全性结果相似:结论:在症状出现后24小时内发生缺血性卒中的患者中,比较静脉注射替罗非班和口服阿司匹林以降低END,没有证据表明不同卒中病因之间存在治疗相互作用。但是,与小血管闭塞或病因未定的患者相比,大动脉粥样硬化患者使用替罗非班所观察到的绝对风险降低幅度最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Stroke
International Journal of Stroke 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信