Stroke etiology was associated with tirofiban efficacy in acute ischemic stroke without endovascular treatment: A pre-specified subgroup analysis of the TREND trial.
Yue Qiao, Min Zhao, Jing Wang, Sijie Li, Ting Yang, Pingping Wang, Xunming Ji, Qingfeng Ma, Wenbo Zhao
{"title":"Stroke etiology was associated with tirofiban efficacy in acute ischemic stroke without endovascular treatment: A pre-specified subgroup analysis of the TREND trial.","authors":"Yue Qiao, Min Zhao, Jing Wang, Sijie Li, Ting Yang, Pingping Wang, Xunming Ji, Qingfeng Ma, Wenbo Zhao","doi":"10.1177/17474930251326423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different stroke etiologies are associated with varied incidences of early neurological deterioration (END) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The Tirofiban for the Prevention of Neurological Deterioration in Acute Ischemic Stroke (TREND) trial demonstrated the efficacy of tirofiban in preventing END in patients with AIS. Herein, we conducted a pre-specified subgroup analysis of this trial data to investigate whether stroke etiologies influenced the effects of tirofiban.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a pre-specified subgroup analysis of the TREND trial, including 413 patients with AIS classified into large-artery atherosclerosis (n = 114), small-vessel occlusion (n = 124), and undetermined etiology (n = 175). The primary outcome was the incidence of END<sub>4</sub> (defined as an increase in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score by ⩾ 4 points) within 72 h. Other outcomes included END<sub>2</sub> (increase in NIHSS score by ⩾ 2 points), early improvement, functional outcomes at 90 days, and safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tirofiban significantly reduced the risk of END<sub>4</sub> in patients with large-artery atherosclerosis (4.1% vs. 21.5%; adjusted odds ratio (OR), 0.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.04-0.78; P = 0.023), while no significant differences were observed in small-vessel occlusion (adjusted OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.02-2.67; P = 0.248) and undetermined etiology (adjusted OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.18-1.55; P = 0.247) subgroups (P for interaction = 0.376). Similar trends were observed for END<sub>2</sub>, with a significant benefit observed in the large-artery atherosclerosis (adjusted OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.08-0.72; P = 0.011). The early improvement rates and 90-day functional outcomes were comparable between the treatment groups across all stroke subtypes. Safety outcomes were similar between antiplatelet therapies in each subgroup.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients who developed ischemic stroke within 24 h of symptom onset, there was no evidence of a treatment interaction across stroke etiologies when comparing intravenous tirofiban to oral aspirin for reducing END. However, the absolute risk reduction observed with tirofiban was greatest in patients with large-artery atherosclerosis compared with those with small-vessel occlusion or undetermined etiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"17474930251326423"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930251326423","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Different stroke etiologies are associated with varied incidences of early neurological deterioration (END) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The Tirofiban for the Prevention of Neurological Deterioration in Acute Ischemic Stroke (TREND) trial demonstrated the efficacy of tirofiban in preventing END in patients with AIS. Herein, we conducted a pre-specified subgroup analysis of this trial data to investigate whether stroke etiologies influenced the effects of tirofiban.
Methods: We performed a pre-specified subgroup analysis of the TREND trial, including 413 patients with AIS classified into large-artery atherosclerosis (n = 114), small-vessel occlusion (n = 124), and undetermined etiology (n = 175). The primary outcome was the incidence of END4 (defined as an increase in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score by ⩾ 4 points) within 72 h. Other outcomes included END2 (increase in NIHSS score by ⩾ 2 points), early improvement, functional outcomes at 90 days, and safety profiles.
Results: Tirofiban significantly reduced the risk of END4 in patients with large-artery atherosclerosis (4.1% vs. 21.5%; adjusted odds ratio (OR), 0.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.04-0.78; P = 0.023), while no significant differences were observed in small-vessel occlusion (adjusted OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.02-2.67; P = 0.248) and undetermined etiology (adjusted OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.18-1.55; P = 0.247) subgroups (P for interaction = 0.376). Similar trends were observed for END2, with a significant benefit observed in the large-artery atherosclerosis (adjusted OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.08-0.72; P = 0.011). The early improvement rates and 90-day functional outcomes were comparable between the treatment groups across all stroke subtypes. Safety outcomes were similar between antiplatelet therapies in each subgroup.
Conclusions: In patients who developed ischemic stroke within 24 h of symptom onset, there was no evidence of a treatment interaction across stroke etiologies when comparing intravenous tirofiban to oral aspirin for reducing END. However, the absolute risk reduction observed with tirofiban was greatest in patients with large-artery atherosclerosis compared with those with small-vessel occlusion or undetermined etiology.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.