Women's perspectives on ultrasound as primary imaging modality for focal breast complaints: a qualitative study.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Carmen C N Siebers, Linda Appelman, Mette Palm, Linda Rainey, Mireille J M Broeders, Ritse M Mann
{"title":"Women's perspectives on ultrasound as primary imaging modality for focal breast complaints: a qualitative study.","authors":"Carmen C N Siebers, Linda Appelman, Mette Palm, Linda Rainey, Mireille J M Broeders, Ritse M Mann","doi":"10.1186/s13244-025-01928-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The breast ultrasound trial (BUST) demonstrates a high negative predictive value of ultrasound for women presenting with focal breast complaints, suggesting a potential shift from mammography/digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to ultrasound as a primary imaging modality. This BUST side-study explored women's perspectives on adopting ultrasound as the primary diagnostic tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-nine female BUST participants (mean age = 48.4, SD = 8.3) with benign findings after diagnostic evaluation participated in one of six focus group interviews 18-24 months post-imaging. Discussions were transcribed and analyzed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four overarching themes were identified; personal health situation, organization of breast care, effectiveness of imaging, and professionals' attitudes and roles. Participants considered their own health history and complaint type (personal health situation) and discussed eligibility for national screening programs and the costs of both exams (organization of breast care). Opinions varied on the effectiveness of imaging, particularly regarding the importance of detecting additional non-symptomatic findings with mammography/DBT that may be missed by ultrasound. Concerns were also raised about implementing research findings without conclusive scientific evidence. Health professionals' attitudes and roles encompassed the influence of GPs' and radiologists' attitudes and the process of image interpretation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings reveal diverse attitudes of women towards ultrasound as a primary modality, warranting caution when transitioning to new clinical standards. Providing comprehensive information about the evidence on the benefits and risks of different imaging modalities is essential, and fostering shared decision-making could enhance acceptance. Offering women the choice of additional imaging, such as mammography/DBT after an initial ultrasound, may balance clinical performance with patient autonomy.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>Patients' perspectives on medical procedures are increasingly significant in modern healthcare. Women's perceived barriers and facilitators to diagnostic imaging, shaped by numerous factors, offer healthcare professionals insights beyond pure biomedical approaches, fostering shared decision-making within radiology and other clinical contexts.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>This study explores women's perspectives on breast ultrasound as a primary imaging modality. Attitudes towards an ultrasound-first approach are shaped by internal and external considerations. Considerations are highly informed by emotional responses and lack of knowledge. Insights into women's perspectives inform healthcare professionals and foster shared decision-making within radiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"16 1","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-01928-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The breast ultrasound trial (BUST) demonstrates a high negative predictive value of ultrasound for women presenting with focal breast complaints, suggesting a potential shift from mammography/digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to ultrasound as a primary imaging modality. This BUST side-study explored women's perspectives on adopting ultrasound as the primary diagnostic tool.

Methods: Twenty-nine female BUST participants (mean age = 48.4, SD = 8.3) with benign findings after diagnostic evaluation participated in one of six focus group interviews 18-24 months post-imaging. Discussions were transcribed and analyzed thematically.

Results: Four overarching themes were identified; personal health situation, organization of breast care, effectiveness of imaging, and professionals' attitudes and roles. Participants considered their own health history and complaint type (personal health situation) and discussed eligibility for national screening programs and the costs of both exams (organization of breast care). Opinions varied on the effectiveness of imaging, particularly regarding the importance of detecting additional non-symptomatic findings with mammography/DBT that may be missed by ultrasound. Concerns were also raised about implementing research findings without conclusive scientific evidence. Health professionals' attitudes and roles encompassed the influence of GPs' and radiologists' attitudes and the process of image interpretation.

Conclusion: These findings reveal diverse attitudes of women towards ultrasound as a primary modality, warranting caution when transitioning to new clinical standards. Providing comprehensive information about the evidence on the benefits and risks of different imaging modalities is essential, and fostering shared decision-making could enhance acceptance. Offering women the choice of additional imaging, such as mammography/DBT after an initial ultrasound, may balance clinical performance with patient autonomy.

Critical relevance statement: Patients' perspectives on medical procedures are increasingly significant in modern healthcare. Women's perceived barriers and facilitators to diagnostic imaging, shaped by numerous factors, offer healthcare professionals insights beyond pure biomedical approaches, fostering shared decision-making within radiology and other clinical contexts.

Key points: This study explores women's perspectives on breast ultrasound as a primary imaging modality. Attitudes towards an ultrasound-first approach are shaped by internal and external considerations. Considerations are highly informed by emotional responses and lack of knowledge. Insights into women's perspectives inform healthcare professionals and foster shared decision-making within radiology.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信