Women's perspectives on ultrasound as primary imaging modality for focal breast complaints: a qualitative study.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Carmen C N Siebers, Linda Appelman, Mette Palm, Linda Rainey, Mireille J M Broeders, Ritse M Mann
{"title":"Women's perspectives on ultrasound as primary imaging modality for focal breast complaints: a qualitative study.","authors":"Carmen C N Siebers, Linda Appelman, Mette Palm, Linda Rainey, Mireille J M Broeders, Ritse M Mann","doi":"10.1186/s13244-025-01928-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The breast ultrasound trial (BUST) demonstrates a high negative predictive value of ultrasound for women presenting with focal breast complaints, suggesting a potential shift from mammography/digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to ultrasound as a primary imaging modality. This BUST side-study explored women's perspectives on adopting ultrasound as the primary diagnostic tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-nine female BUST participants (mean age = 48.4, SD = 8.3) with benign findings after diagnostic evaluation participated in one of six focus group interviews 18-24 months post-imaging. Discussions were transcribed and analyzed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four overarching themes were identified; personal health situation, organization of breast care, effectiveness of imaging, and professionals' attitudes and roles. Participants considered their own health history and complaint type (personal health situation) and discussed eligibility for national screening programs and the costs of both exams (organization of breast care). Opinions varied on the effectiveness of imaging, particularly regarding the importance of detecting additional non-symptomatic findings with mammography/DBT that may be missed by ultrasound. Concerns were also raised about implementing research findings without conclusive scientific evidence. Health professionals' attitudes and roles encompassed the influence of GPs' and radiologists' attitudes and the process of image interpretation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings reveal diverse attitudes of women towards ultrasound as a primary modality, warranting caution when transitioning to new clinical standards. Providing comprehensive information about the evidence on the benefits and risks of different imaging modalities is essential, and fostering shared decision-making could enhance acceptance. Offering women the choice of additional imaging, such as mammography/DBT after an initial ultrasound, may balance clinical performance with patient autonomy.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>Patients' perspectives on medical procedures are increasingly significant in modern healthcare. Women's perceived barriers and facilitators to diagnostic imaging, shaped by numerous factors, offer healthcare professionals insights beyond pure biomedical approaches, fostering shared decision-making within radiology and other clinical contexts.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>This study explores women's perspectives on breast ultrasound as a primary imaging modality. Attitudes towards an ultrasound-first approach are shaped by internal and external considerations. Considerations are highly informed by emotional responses and lack of knowledge. Insights into women's perspectives inform healthcare professionals and foster shared decision-making within radiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"16 1","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-01928-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The breast ultrasound trial (BUST) demonstrates a high negative predictive value of ultrasound for women presenting with focal breast complaints, suggesting a potential shift from mammography/digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to ultrasound as a primary imaging modality. This BUST side-study explored women's perspectives on adopting ultrasound as the primary diagnostic tool.

Methods: Twenty-nine female BUST participants (mean age = 48.4, SD = 8.3) with benign findings after diagnostic evaluation participated in one of six focus group interviews 18-24 months post-imaging. Discussions were transcribed and analyzed thematically.

Results: Four overarching themes were identified; personal health situation, organization of breast care, effectiveness of imaging, and professionals' attitudes and roles. Participants considered their own health history and complaint type (personal health situation) and discussed eligibility for national screening programs and the costs of both exams (organization of breast care). Opinions varied on the effectiveness of imaging, particularly regarding the importance of detecting additional non-symptomatic findings with mammography/DBT that may be missed by ultrasound. Concerns were also raised about implementing research findings without conclusive scientific evidence. Health professionals' attitudes and roles encompassed the influence of GPs' and radiologists' attitudes and the process of image interpretation.

Conclusion: These findings reveal diverse attitudes of women towards ultrasound as a primary modality, warranting caution when transitioning to new clinical standards. Providing comprehensive information about the evidence on the benefits and risks of different imaging modalities is essential, and fostering shared decision-making could enhance acceptance. Offering women the choice of additional imaging, such as mammography/DBT after an initial ultrasound, may balance clinical performance with patient autonomy.

Critical relevance statement: Patients' perspectives on medical procedures are increasingly significant in modern healthcare. Women's perceived barriers and facilitators to diagnostic imaging, shaped by numerous factors, offer healthcare professionals insights beyond pure biomedical approaches, fostering shared decision-making within radiology and other clinical contexts.

Key points: This study explores women's perspectives on breast ultrasound as a primary imaging modality. Attitudes towards an ultrasound-first approach are shaped by internal and external considerations. Considerations are highly informed by emotional responses and lack of knowledge. Insights into women's perspectives inform healthcare professionals and foster shared decision-making within radiology.

妇女对超声作为局灶性乳房主诉的主要成像方式的看法:一项定性研究。
目的:乳房超声试验(BUST)表明,超声对出现局灶性乳房疾病的女性具有很高的阴性预测价值,这表明从乳房x线摄影/数字乳房断层合成(DBT)到超声作为主要成像方式的潜在转变。这项胸围侧研究探讨了妇女对采用超声作为主要诊断工具的看法。方法:29名女性胸围患者(平均年龄48.4,SD = 8.3)在影像学检查后18-24个月进行了6次焦点小组访谈。讨论被记录下来并按主题进行分析。结果:确定了四个总体主题;个人健康状况、乳房护理的组织、成像的有效性以及专业人员的态度和作用。参与者考虑了自己的健康史和投诉类型(个人健康状况),并讨论了国家筛查计划的资格和两项检查的费用(乳腺护理组织)。对于影像学检查的有效性,特别是对于超声检查可能遗漏的乳房x光检查/DBT检查其他无症状发现的重要性,意见不一。人们还对在没有确凿科学证据的情况下实施研究结果表示担忧。卫生专业人员的态度和角色包括全科医生和放射科医生的态度和图像解释过程的影响。结论:这些发现揭示了妇女对超声作为主要方式的不同态度,在过渡到新的临床标准时需要谨慎。提供关于不同成像方式的益处和风险的证据的综合信息是必不可少的,促进共同决策可以提高接受度。为女性提供额外的影像学选择,如在初始超声检查后进行乳房x光检查/DBT检查,可以平衡临床表现和患者自主权。关键相关性声明:在现代医疗保健中,患者对医疗程序的看法越来越重要。女性对诊断成像的感知障碍和促进因素受到许多因素的影响,为医疗保健专业人员提供了超越纯生物医学方法的见解,促进了放射学和其他临床环境中的共同决策。重点:本研究探讨了女性对乳房超声作为主要成像方式的看法。对超声优先方法的态度受到内部和外部因素的影响。情绪反应和知识的缺乏高度影响了考虑。对妇女观点的见解为医疗保健专业人员提供信息,并促进放射学中的共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信