Efficacy and tolerability of low versus standard daily doses of antiseizure medications in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. A multicenter, randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial (STANDLOW)

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Open Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1002/epi4.70016
Giorgia Giussani, Elisa Bianchi, Edoardo Carlando, Jacopo Cosimo DiFrancesco, Payam Tabaee Damavandi, Francesco Pasini, Giulia Pederzoli, Stefania Filipponi, Alessandra Gaiani, Luca Massacesi, Eleonora Rosati, Ginevra Giovannelli, Teresa Anna Cantisani, Michela Cecconi, Rossella Papetti, Monica Brioschi, Francesco Aruta, Elio Clemente Agostoni, Francesco Paladin, Filippo Dainese, Marco Longoni, Bartolini Yerma, Sara Gasparini, Umberto Aguglia, Edoardo Ferlazzo, Roberto Cantello, Gionata Strigaro, Marta Maschio, Dario Benincasa, Angela La Neve, Giovanni Falcicchio, Alfonso Giordano, Lara Buttarelli, Gabriele Enia, Maurizio Leone, Carlo Ferrarese, Ettore Beghi, Simone Beretta
{"title":"Efficacy and tolerability of low versus standard daily doses of antiseizure medications in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. A multicenter, randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial (STANDLOW)","authors":"Giorgia Giussani,&nbsp;Elisa Bianchi,&nbsp;Edoardo Carlando,&nbsp;Jacopo Cosimo DiFrancesco,&nbsp;Payam Tabaee Damavandi,&nbsp;Francesco Pasini,&nbsp;Giulia Pederzoli,&nbsp;Stefania Filipponi,&nbsp;Alessandra Gaiani,&nbsp;Luca Massacesi,&nbsp;Eleonora Rosati,&nbsp;Ginevra Giovannelli,&nbsp;Teresa Anna Cantisani,&nbsp;Michela Cecconi,&nbsp;Rossella Papetti,&nbsp;Monica Brioschi,&nbsp;Francesco Aruta,&nbsp;Elio Clemente Agostoni,&nbsp;Francesco Paladin,&nbsp;Filippo Dainese,&nbsp;Marco Longoni,&nbsp;Bartolini Yerma,&nbsp;Sara Gasparini,&nbsp;Umberto Aguglia,&nbsp;Edoardo Ferlazzo,&nbsp;Roberto Cantello,&nbsp;Gionata Strigaro,&nbsp;Marta Maschio,&nbsp;Dario Benincasa,&nbsp;Angela La Neve,&nbsp;Giovanni Falcicchio,&nbsp;Alfonso Giordano,&nbsp;Lara Buttarelli,&nbsp;Gabriele Enia,&nbsp;Maurizio Leone,&nbsp;Carlo Ferrarese,&nbsp;Ettore Beghi,&nbsp;Simone Beretta","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The STANDLOW trial investigated whether first-line antiseizure monotherapy with low doses has a similar efficacy to standard doses, but with fewer adverse events, improved quality of life, and reduced costs for the National Health System.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Multicenter, randomized, parallel-arm, single-blind, non-inferiority trial, comparing low dose versus standard dose of antiseizure medications (carbamazepine, levetiracetam, valproate, zonisamide, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, lamotrigine, gabapentin, lacosamide) in adults with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of 58 randomized patients, 29 in the low dose arm and 29 in the standard dose arm, 27 (46.6%) females and 31 (53.4%) males, with an age between 18 and 87 years (median 54.9, IQR 32–71). The seizure type was focal impaired awareness seizures in 44 (75.9%) and focal aware seizures in 14 (24.1%). Etiology was unknown in 43 (74.1%) and structural in 15 (25.9%). At study entry, EEG was epileptiform in 28 (48.2%) and seizure frequency was low (≤2 seizures/month) in 41 (70.7%). The estimated relapse proportions at 12 months were 47% for the low dose and 48% for the standard dose, with a difference of 1% (95% CI: −30%; 27%). At the end of the study visit (12 months of follow-up, or immediately after seizure relapse or study withdrawal for other reasons, whichever came first), no differences in the number or severity of adverse events or quality of life measures were observed between the two treatment groups. The total drug-related costs over the entire study period were lower in the low dose arm (median per participant 253 € versus 475 € in the standard dose arm).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance</h3>\n \n <p>Although the efficacy of low doses versus standard doses appeared similar, non-inferiority could not be demonstrated due to slow recruitment and premature termination of the trial. Although statistically inconclusive, our findings suggest that a low dose of antiseizure medications may be considered as a first-line option in adult patients with a new diagnosis of focal epilepsy of unknown etiology and low seizure frequency.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to see if low doses of anti-seizure medications (ASMs) could be as effective as standard doses in treating adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Subjects were assigned to receive either a low or standard dose of ASMs. 58 adults participated. Both low and standard doses seemed to have a similar effect on controlling seizures. The study was stopped early due to slow enrollment, making it difficult to definitively prove that low doses were non-inferior to standard doses. Low doses of ASMs might be a reasonable option for adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy with no clear cause and few seizures.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":"10 2","pages":"643-653"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epi4.70016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epi4.70016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The STANDLOW trial investigated whether first-line antiseizure monotherapy with low doses has a similar efficacy to standard doses, but with fewer adverse events, improved quality of life, and reduced costs for the National Health System.

Methods

Multicenter, randomized, parallel-arm, single-blind, non-inferiority trial, comparing low dose versus standard dose of antiseizure medications (carbamazepine, levetiracetam, valproate, zonisamide, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, lamotrigine, gabapentin, lacosamide) in adults with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy.

Results

The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of 58 randomized patients, 29 in the low dose arm and 29 in the standard dose arm, 27 (46.6%) females and 31 (53.4%) males, with an age between 18 and 87 years (median 54.9, IQR 32–71). The seizure type was focal impaired awareness seizures in 44 (75.9%) and focal aware seizures in 14 (24.1%). Etiology was unknown in 43 (74.1%) and structural in 15 (25.9%). At study entry, EEG was epileptiform in 28 (48.2%) and seizure frequency was low (≤2 seizures/month) in 41 (70.7%). The estimated relapse proportions at 12 months were 47% for the low dose and 48% for the standard dose, with a difference of 1% (95% CI: −30%; 27%). At the end of the study visit (12 months of follow-up, or immediately after seizure relapse or study withdrawal for other reasons, whichever came first), no differences in the number or severity of adverse events or quality of life measures were observed between the two treatment groups. The total drug-related costs over the entire study period were lower in the low dose arm (median per participant 253 € versus 475 € in the standard dose arm).

Significance

Although the efficacy of low doses versus standard doses appeared similar, non-inferiority could not be demonstrated due to slow recruitment and premature termination of the trial. Although statistically inconclusive, our findings suggest that a low dose of antiseizure medications may be considered as a first-line option in adult patients with a new diagnosis of focal epilepsy of unknown etiology and low seizure frequency.

Plain Language Summary

This study aimed to see if low doses of anti-seizure medications (ASMs) could be as effective as standard doses in treating adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Subjects were assigned to receive either a low or standard dose of ASMs. 58 adults participated. Both low and standard doses seemed to have a similar effect on controlling seizures. The study was stopped early due to slow enrollment, making it difficult to definitively prove that low doses were non-inferior to standard doses. Low doses of ASMs might be a reasonable option for adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy with no clear cause and few seizures.

Abstract Image

低剂量与标准日剂量抗癫痫药物在新诊断局灶性癫痫中的疗效和耐受性。多中心、随机、单盲、非劣效性试验(STANDLOW)。
目的:STANDLOW试验调查低剂量一线抗癫痫单药治疗是否具有与标准剂量相似的疗效,但不良事件更少,生活质量得到改善,并降低了国家卫生系统的成本。方法:多中心、随机、平行、单盲、非效性试验,比较低剂量和标准剂量的抗癫痫药物(卡马西平、左乙拉西坦、丙戊酸、唑尼沙胺、奥卡西平、托吡酯、拉莫三嗪、加巴喷丁、拉科沙胺)治疗新诊断为局灶性癫痫的成人。意向治疗(ITT)人群包括58例随机患者,低剂量组29例,标准剂量组29例,女性27例(46.6%),男性31例(53.4%),年龄在18 - 87岁之间(中位54.9,IQR 32-71)。发作类型为局灶性意识障碍发作44例(75.9%),局灶性意识障碍发作14例(24.1%)。病因不明者43例(74.1%),结构性15例(25.9%)。研究开始时,28例(48.2%)脑电图呈癫痫样,41例(70.7%)癫痫发作频率低(≤2次/月)。估计12个月时低剂量组的复发率为47%,标准剂量组为48%,差异为1% (95% CI: -30%;27%)。在研究访问结束时(随访12个月,或癫痫复发或因其他原因退出研究后立即,以先出现者为准),在不良事件的数量或严重程度或生活质量测量方面,两个治疗组之间没有观察到差异。在整个研究期间,低剂量组的药物相关总成本较低(每位参与者的中位数为253欧元,而标准剂量组为475欧元)。意义:虽然低剂量与标准剂量的疗效相似,但由于招募缓慢和试验过早终止,不能证明非劣效性。虽然在统计上尚无定论,但我们的研究结果表明,对于病因不明且癫痫发作频率低的局灶性癫痫新诊断的成年患者,低剂量抗癫痫药物可作为一线选择。简明扼要:本研究旨在观察低剂量抗癫痫药物(asm)在治疗新诊断的成人癫痫方面是否与标准剂量一样有效。受试者被分配接受低剂量或标准剂量的抗痉挛药物。58名成年人参与了调查。低剂量和标准剂量在控制癫痫发作方面似乎都有相似的效果。由于入组缓慢,该研究被提前终止,因此很难明确证明低剂量不劣于标准剂量。低剂量的抗痉挛药可能是一个合理的选择,成人新诊断癫痫没有明确的原因,很少发作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsia Open
Epilepsia Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信