Healthcare provider-mediated cascade testing of Lynch syndrome to at-risk family members: an interview study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Serene Ong, Zi Yang Chua, Jeanette Yuen, Jianbang Chiang, Zhang Zewen, Joanne Ngeow, Tamra Lysaght
{"title":"Healthcare provider-mediated cascade testing of Lynch syndrome to at-risk family members: an interview study.","authors":"Serene Ong, Zi Yang Chua, Jeanette Yuen, Jianbang Chiang, Zhang Zewen, Joanne Ngeow, Tamra Lysaght","doi":"10.1007/s10689-025-00450-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cascade testing is often recommended for cancer predisposition syndromes, like Lynch syndrome (LS), to identify at-risk family members. The uptake of cascade testing is typically meditated by the proband's willingness to disclose their results with family members. Of which, cascade testing uptake rates in Singapore has been low, compared to global rates. Studies suggest that healthcare providers (HCPs)-meditated contact of at-risk family improves uptake, yet few have explored how receptive probands and family members are to such a model. Moreover, no studies to date have examined such a model of cascade testing in Asia. To address this gap, we interviewed 17 participants (probands and relatives) in Singapore to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of HCP-mediated cascade testing for families with LS. Our findings show broad acceptability for HCP-mediated disclosure to relatives, driven by a sense of beneficence. However, HCP involvement introduced three unique issues to disclosure process: (i) their clinical position, which conveys expertise and authority; (ii) relational complexities within family dynamics; and (iii) the notion of family-centric privacy. We propose that HCP-mediated disclosure may be best implemented through a cooperative and flexible process, tailored to each family's unique circumstances. This approach balances the efficiency of providing accurate genetic information whilst sensitively navigating familial relationships, thereby improving uptake while respecting cultural and relational nuances.</p>","PeriodicalId":12336,"journal":{"name":"Familial Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Familial Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-025-00450-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cascade testing is often recommended for cancer predisposition syndromes, like Lynch syndrome (LS), to identify at-risk family members. The uptake of cascade testing is typically meditated by the proband's willingness to disclose their results with family members. Of which, cascade testing uptake rates in Singapore has been low, compared to global rates. Studies suggest that healthcare providers (HCPs)-meditated contact of at-risk family improves uptake, yet few have explored how receptive probands and family members are to such a model. Moreover, no studies to date have examined such a model of cascade testing in Asia. To address this gap, we interviewed 17 participants (probands and relatives) in Singapore to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of HCP-mediated cascade testing for families with LS. Our findings show broad acceptability for HCP-mediated disclosure to relatives, driven by a sense of beneficence. However, HCP involvement introduced three unique issues to disclosure process: (i) their clinical position, which conveys expertise and authority; (ii) relational complexities within family dynamics; and (iii) the notion of family-centric privacy. We propose that HCP-mediated disclosure may be best implemented through a cooperative and flexible process, tailored to each family's unique circumstances. This approach balances the efficiency of providing accurate genetic information whilst sensitively navigating familial relationships, thereby improving uptake while respecting cultural and relational nuances.

医疗服务提供者介导的Lynch综合征级联检测对高危家庭成员:一项访谈研究。
对于林奇综合征(Lynch Syndrome,LS)等癌症易感综合征,通常建议进行级联检测,以确定高危家庭成员。接受级联检测的比例通常取决于患者是否愿意向家庭成员公开检测结果。其中,与全球相比,新加坡的级联检测接受率较低。研究表明,由医疗保健提供者(HCPs)促成的与高危家庭的接触可提高接受率,但很少有研究探讨了原发者和家庭成员对这种模式的接受程度。此外,迄今为止,在亚洲还没有研究探讨过这种级联检测模式。为了填补这一空白,我们在新加坡采访了17名参与者(受试者和亲属),以评估由HCP介导的LS家庭级联检测的可接受性和可行性。我们的研究结果表明,在受益感的驱使下,人们普遍接受以保健医生为中介向亲属披露信息。然而,医疗保健人员的参与给披露过程带来了三个独特的问题:(i) 他们的临床地位,传达了专业知识和权威;(ii) 家庭动态中的复杂关系;(iii) 以家庭为中心的隐私概念。我们建议,最好通过合作和灵活的流程来实施以 HCP 为中介的信息披露,并根据每个家庭的独特情况量身定制。这种方法既能提高提供准确遗传信息的效率,又能以敏感的态度处理家庭关系,从而在尊重文化和关系细微差别的同时提高接受率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Familial Cancer
Familial Cancer 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In recent years clinical cancer genetics has become increasingly important. Several events, in particular the developments in DNA-based technology, have contributed to this evolution. Clinical cancer genetics has now matured to a medical discipline which is truly multidisciplinary in which clinical and molecular geneticists work together with clinical and medical oncologists as well as with psycho-social workers. Due to the multidisciplinary nature of clinical cancer genetics most papers are currently being published in a wide variety of journals on epidemiology, oncology and genetics. Familial Cancer provides a forum bringing these topics together focusing on the interests and needs of the clinician. The journal mainly concentrates on clinical cancer genetics. Most major areas in the field shall be included, such as epidemiology of familial cancer, molecular analysis and diagnosis, clinical expression, treatment and prevention, counselling and the health economics of familial cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信