Post-marketing safety of Adagrasib: a disproportionality analysis based on the FAERS database.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Zheng Shi, Xiayao Yu, Yifan Zhao, Keda Shao, Chunwei Xu, Zhengbo Song
{"title":"Post-marketing safety of Adagrasib: a disproportionality analysis based on the FAERS database.","authors":"Zheng Shi, Xiayao Yu, Yifan Zhao, Keda Shao, Chunwei Xu, Zhengbo Song","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2468866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adagrasib is a novel KRAS G12C inhibitor. While its clinical efficacy has been demonstrated, comprehensive post-marketing safety data remain limited. This study aimed to analyze adverse reactions involving Adagrasib from the FAERS database to identify potential safety signals.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis was performed using FAERS data during Q4 2022 through Q2 2024. After deduplication. disproportionality analysis was performed using four algorithms: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 598 cases involving Adagrasib were identified, encompassing 1717 adverse events (AEs). The most common AEs were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, asthenia, and decreased appetite. New strong significant AE signals were detected, including dissociation, status epilepticus, cerebral disorder, and photosensitivity reaction. The median time to AE onset was 34 days, and most AEs happened within the initial month of treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study highlights some new AE signals associated with Adagrasib, emphasizing the importance of continued pharmacovigilance. While the findings contribute to understanding Adagrasib's safety profile, further validation through large-scale prospective studies is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2468866","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adagrasib is a novel KRAS G12C inhibitor. While its clinical efficacy has been demonstrated, comprehensive post-marketing safety data remain limited. This study aimed to analyze adverse reactions involving Adagrasib from the FAERS database to identify potential safety signals.

Research design and methods: A retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis was performed using FAERS data during Q4 2022 through Q2 2024. After deduplication. disproportionality analysis was performed using four algorithms: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM).

Results: A total of 598 cases involving Adagrasib were identified, encompassing 1717 adverse events (AEs). The most common AEs were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, asthenia, and decreased appetite. New strong significant AE signals were detected, including dissociation, status epilepticus, cerebral disorder, and photosensitivity reaction. The median time to AE onset was 34 days, and most AEs happened within the initial month of treatment.

Conclusions: Our study highlights some new AE signals associated with Adagrasib, emphasizing the importance of continued pharmacovigilance. While the findings contribute to understanding Adagrasib's safety profile, further validation through large-scale prospective studies is needed.

Adagrasib上市后的安全性:基于FAERS数据库的比例失调分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信