Werner Pieter Veldsman, Qi Zhang, Qian Zhao, Lu Zhang, Zou Yuanjie
{"title":"The Antimicrobial Peptide Pipeline: A Bacteria-Centric AMP Predictor.","authors":"Werner Pieter Veldsman, Qi Zhang, Qian Zhao, Lu Zhang, Zou Yuanjie","doi":"10.2174/0115665232343790250120071445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), unlike antibiotics, are encoded in genomes. AMPs are exported from the cell after expression and translation. In the case of bacteria, the exported peptides target other microbes to give the producing bacterium a competitive edge. While AMPs are sought after for their similar antimicrobial activity to traditional antibiotics, it is difficult to predict which combinations of amino acids will confer antimicrobial activity. Many computer algorithms have been designed to predict whether a sequence of amino acids will exhibit antimicrobial activity, but the vast majority of validated AMPs in databases are still of eukaryotic origin. This defies common sense since the vast majority of life on Earth is prokaryotic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The antimicrobial peptide pipeline, presented here, is a bacteria-centric AMP predictor that predicts AMPs by taking design inspiration from the sequence properties of bacterial genomes with the intention to improve the detection of naturally occurring bacterial AMPs. The pipeline integrates multiple concepts of comparative biology to search for candidate AMPs at the primary, secondary, and tertiary peptide structure levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that the antimicrobial peptide pipeline identifies known AMPs that are missed by state-of-the-art AMP predictors and that the pipeline yields more AMP candidates from real bacterial genomes than from fake genomes, with the rate of AMP detection being significantly higher in the genomes of six nosocomial pathogens than in the fake genomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This bacteria-centric AMP pipeline enhances the detection of bacterial AMPs by incorporating sequence properties unique to bacterial genomes. It complements existing tools, addressing gaps in AMP detection and providing a promising avenue for discovering novel antimicrobial peptides.</p>","PeriodicalId":10798,"journal":{"name":"Current gene therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current gene therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115665232343790250120071445","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), unlike antibiotics, are encoded in genomes. AMPs are exported from the cell after expression and translation. In the case of bacteria, the exported peptides target other microbes to give the producing bacterium a competitive edge. While AMPs are sought after for their similar antimicrobial activity to traditional antibiotics, it is difficult to predict which combinations of amino acids will confer antimicrobial activity. Many computer algorithms have been designed to predict whether a sequence of amino acids will exhibit antimicrobial activity, but the vast majority of validated AMPs in databases are still of eukaryotic origin. This defies common sense since the vast majority of life on Earth is prokaryotic.
Methods: The antimicrobial peptide pipeline, presented here, is a bacteria-centric AMP predictor that predicts AMPs by taking design inspiration from the sequence properties of bacterial genomes with the intention to improve the detection of naturally occurring bacterial AMPs. The pipeline integrates multiple concepts of comparative biology to search for candidate AMPs at the primary, secondary, and tertiary peptide structure levels.
Results: Results showed that the antimicrobial peptide pipeline identifies known AMPs that are missed by state-of-the-art AMP predictors and that the pipeline yields more AMP candidates from real bacterial genomes than from fake genomes, with the rate of AMP detection being significantly higher in the genomes of six nosocomial pathogens than in the fake genomes.
Conclusion: This bacteria-centric AMP pipeline enhances the detection of bacterial AMPs by incorporating sequence properties unique to bacterial genomes. It complements existing tools, addressing gaps in AMP detection and providing a promising avenue for discovering novel antimicrobial peptides.
期刊介绍:
Current Gene Therapy is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal aimed at academic and industrial scientists with an interest in major topics concerning basic research and clinical applications of gene and cell therapy of diseases. Cell therapy manuscripts can also include application in diseases when cells have been genetically modified. Current Gene Therapy publishes full-length/mini reviews and original research on the latest developments in gene transfer and gene expression analysis, vector development, cellular genetic engineering, animal models and human clinical applications of gene and cell therapy for the treatment of diseases.
Current Gene Therapy publishes reviews and original research containing experimental data on gene and cell therapy. The journal also includes manuscripts on technological advances, ethical and regulatory considerations of gene and cell therapy. Reviews should provide the reader with a comprehensive assessment of any area of experimental biology applied to molecular medicine that is not only of significance within a particular field of gene therapy and cell therapy but also of interest to investigators in other fields. Authors are encouraged to provide their own assessment and vision for future advances. Reviews are also welcome on late breaking discoveries on which substantial literature has not yet been amassed. Such reviews provide a forum for sharply focused topics of recent experimental investigations in gene therapy primarily to make these results accessible to both clinical and basic researchers. Manuscripts containing experimental data should be original data, not previously published.