Noise-shaped hysteresis cycles of the AMOC under increasing CO2 forcing.

IF 2.7 2区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED
Chaos Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1063/5.0241503
Matteo Cini, Giuseppe Zappa, Francesco Ragone, Susanna Corti
{"title":"Noise-shaped hysteresis cycles of the AMOC under increasing CO2 forcing.","authors":"Matteo Cini, Giuseppe Zappa, Francesco Ragone, Susanna Corti","doi":"10.1063/5.0241503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) stability landscape is commonly investigated with single-realization hysteresis diagrams driven by freshwater input in the North Atlantic Ocean. However, the effect of CO2 forcing on one side and the role of internal climate variability on the timing of tipping and the AMOC hysteresis on the other side remain less explored. Here, we address this gap by running three independent AMOC hysteresis simulations, consisting of a slow ramp-up plus ramp-down in the CO2 concentration (0.2 ppm/year) within the PlaSim-Large-Scale Geostrophic (LSG) intermediate complexity model. We show that the realizations of the CO2-driven hysteresis cycle, and particularly, the timing of the tipping and recovery, are remarkably affected by internal climate variability. In one of the three simulations, we even observe a reversed cycle, where the AMOC recovers at a higher CO2 level than at the collapse point. While statistical Early Warning Signals (EWSs) show some success in detecting the tipping points, we also find that the internal variability in the EWS considerably reduces the predictability of collapse and leads to false positives of an approaching AMOC tipping. We suggest that the AMOC collapse in the presence of internal climate variability may have characteristics that deviate substantially from the behavior seen in simple models and that caution is needed when interpreting results from a single-experiment realization. Our findings highlight the need for a probabilistic approach in defining a \"safe operating space\" for AMOC stability, since it might not be possible to define a single critical CO2 threshold to prevent AMOC collapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":9974,"journal":{"name":"Chaos","volume":"35 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chaos","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0241503","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) stability landscape is commonly investigated with single-realization hysteresis diagrams driven by freshwater input in the North Atlantic Ocean. However, the effect of CO2 forcing on one side and the role of internal climate variability on the timing of tipping and the AMOC hysteresis on the other side remain less explored. Here, we address this gap by running three independent AMOC hysteresis simulations, consisting of a slow ramp-up plus ramp-down in the CO2 concentration (0.2 ppm/year) within the PlaSim-Large-Scale Geostrophic (LSG) intermediate complexity model. We show that the realizations of the CO2-driven hysteresis cycle, and particularly, the timing of the tipping and recovery, are remarkably affected by internal climate variability. In one of the three simulations, we even observe a reversed cycle, where the AMOC recovers at a higher CO2 level than at the collapse point. While statistical Early Warning Signals (EWSs) show some success in detecting the tipping points, we also find that the internal variability in the EWS considerably reduces the predictability of collapse and leads to false positives of an approaching AMOC tipping. We suggest that the AMOC collapse in the presence of internal climate variability may have characteristics that deviate substantially from the behavior seen in simple models and that caution is needed when interpreting results from a single-experiment realization. Our findings highlight the need for a probabilistic approach in defining a "safe operating space" for AMOC stability, since it might not be possible to define a single critical CO2 threshold to prevent AMOC collapse.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chaos
Chaos 物理-物理:数学物理
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
13.80%
发文量
448
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to increasing the understanding of nonlinear phenomena and describing the manifestations in a manner comprehensible to researchers from a broad spectrum of disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信