Systematic review of the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of non-pneumatic antishock garments in low- and middle-income countries: lessons for global health.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Qin Xiang Ng, Clyve Yu Leon Yaow, Hiang Khoon Tan, Marcus Eng Hock Ong, Heta Kosonen, Jonas Karlström
{"title":"Systematic review of the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of non-pneumatic antishock garments in low- and middle-income countries: lessons for global health.","authors":"Qin Xiang Ng, Clyve Yu Leon Yaow, Hiang Khoon Tan, Marcus Eng Hock Ong, Heta Kosonen, Jonas Karlström","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstetric haemorrhage is a leading global cause of maternal mortality, particularly in rural and resource-poor settings where delays in care are common. Non-pneumatic antishock garments (NASGs) have been proposed as a temporising measure to reduce blood loss and improve survival rates. Despite positive outcomes from clinical trials, the uptake of the NASG has been slow and faced various implementation challenges. This review thus aims to identify and analyse the barriers and facilitators of NASG implementation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a comprehensive search strategy was developed to search for studies related to NASG use in Medline, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library from inception up to August 2024. Grey literature was also reviewed. Two independent reviewers screened identified records using Covidence, assessing relevant studies for inclusion. Data were synthesised using a narrative approach structured around the CFIR's five domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 studies were reviewed. Common barriers included high initial procurement costs. Inadequate training and knowledge among healthcare providers were another obstacle, resulting in low confidence in the proper use of NASG. Logistical issues, such as inconsistent supply chains and difficulties in maintaining NASG devices, were highlighted, alongside the challenges posed by under-resourced health infrastructures. Facilitators included effective training programmes, support from health authorities, advocacy by local and national champions, and successful integration into clinical protocols and health systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation experience of NASG in LMICs highlights important lessons for stakeholders in the global health space, with challenges such as high initial costs and inadequate training being common obstacles in LMICs. Addressing these barriers and leveraging facilitators (eg, through comprehensive training, garnering local and international support and active sourcing for locally produced materials to reduce costs) across multilevel contexts influence implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017681","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obstetric haemorrhage is a leading global cause of maternal mortality, particularly in rural and resource-poor settings where delays in care are common. Non-pneumatic antishock garments (NASGs) have been proposed as a temporising measure to reduce blood loss and improve survival rates. Despite positive outcomes from clinical trials, the uptake of the NASG has been slow and faced various implementation challenges. This review thus aims to identify and analyse the barriers and facilitators of NASG implementation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a comprehensive search strategy was developed to search for studies related to NASG use in Medline, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library from inception up to August 2024. Grey literature was also reviewed. Two independent reviewers screened identified records using Covidence, assessing relevant studies for inclusion. Data were synthesised using a narrative approach structured around the CFIR's five domains.

Results: A total of 17 studies were reviewed. Common barriers included high initial procurement costs. Inadequate training and knowledge among healthcare providers were another obstacle, resulting in low confidence in the proper use of NASG. Logistical issues, such as inconsistent supply chains and difficulties in maintaining NASG devices, were highlighted, alongside the challenges posed by under-resourced health infrastructures. Facilitators included effective training programmes, support from health authorities, advocacy by local and national champions, and successful integration into clinical protocols and health systems.

Conclusions: The implementation experience of NASG in LMICs highlights important lessons for stakeholders in the global health space, with challenges such as high initial costs and inadequate training being common obstacles in LMICs. Addressing these barriers and leveraging facilitators (eg, through comprehensive training, garnering local and international support and active sourcing for locally produced materials to reduce costs) across multilevel contexts influence implementation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信