Sex Disparity and the Uptake of Home Dialysis following Kidney Transplant Failure.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Wai Lim, Ryan Gately, Armando Teixeira-Pinto, Pedro Lopez, Dharshana Sabanayagam, William R Mulley, Helen Pilmore, Doris Chan, Esther Ooi, Charmaine Lok, Germaine Wong
{"title":"Sex Disparity and the Uptake of Home Dialysis following Kidney Transplant Failure.","authors":"Wai Lim, Ryan Gately, Armando Teixeira-Pinto, Pedro Lopez, Dharshana Sabanayagam, William R Mulley, Helen Pilmore, Doris Chan, Esther Ooi, Charmaine Lok, Germaine Wong","doi":"10.1159/000543788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Home dialysis modalities offer several clinical and economic benefits compared to facility-based dialysis treatment in patients with kidney failure. Studies have shown that sex and socioeconomic status (SES) disparities exist in access to dialysis and transplantation in patients with kidney failure, but whether similar disparities occur in access to home dialysis after kidney transplant failure is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the ANZDATA registry, patients who commenced dialysis after kidney transplant failure in Australia were included (2000-2020). The associations between sex and uptake of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home hemodialysis (HHD) at 12 months after kidney transplant failure were examined using adjusted logistic regression, with interactive effect between sex and SES evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3,521 patients who experienced first kidney transplant failure, 1,352 (38%) were females. At 12 months following transplant failure, 483 (14%) were maintained on PD and 425 (12%) on HHD. Compared to females, males were less likely to select PD at 12 months after transplant failure, with an adjusted OR (95% CI) of 0.55 (0.44-0.68). The adjusted OR (95% CI) for the uptake of HHD at 12 months in males was 1.66 (1.29-2.12). There were significant interactions between sex and SES for the 12-month uptake of PD and HHD, such that for patients from socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, the respective adjusted ORs for the uptake of PD and HHD in male patients were 0.61 (0.45-0.84) and 2.25 (1.51-3.51) compared to female patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Males who lost their kidney allografts were more likely to choose HHD over PD compared to female patients. This sex disparity was more pronounced in individuals from socioeconomically disadvantaged areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":7570,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543788","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Home dialysis modalities offer several clinical and economic benefits compared to facility-based dialysis treatment in patients with kidney failure. Studies have shown that sex and socioeconomic status (SES) disparities exist in access to dialysis and transplantation in patients with kidney failure, but whether similar disparities occur in access to home dialysis after kidney transplant failure is unknown.

Methods: Using data from the ANZDATA registry, patients who commenced dialysis after kidney transplant failure in Australia were included (2000-2020). The associations between sex and uptake of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home hemodialysis (HHD) at 12 months after kidney transplant failure were examined using adjusted logistic regression, with interactive effect between sex and SES evaluated.

Results: Of 3,521 patients who experienced first kidney transplant failure, 1,352 (38%) were females. At 12 months following transplant failure, 483 (14%) were maintained on PD and 425 (12%) on HHD. Compared to females, males were less likely to select PD at 12 months after transplant failure, with an adjusted OR (95% CI) of 0.55 (0.44-0.68). The adjusted OR (95% CI) for the uptake of HHD at 12 months in males was 1.66 (1.29-2.12). There were significant interactions between sex and SES for the 12-month uptake of PD and HHD, such that for patients from socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, the respective adjusted ORs for the uptake of PD and HHD in male patients were 0.61 (0.45-0.84) and 2.25 (1.51-3.51) compared to female patients.

Conclusion: Males who lost their kidney allografts were more likely to choose HHD over PD compared to female patients. This sex disparity was more pronounced in individuals from socioeconomically disadvantaged areas.

性别差异与肾移植失败后家庭透析的吸收。
简介:家庭透析方式提供了几个临床和经济效益相比,以设施为基础的透析治疗肾衰竭患者。研究表明,在肾衰竭患者获得透析和移植方面存在性别和社会经济地位(SES)差异,但在肾移植失败后获得家庭透析是否也存在类似差异尚不清楚。方法:使用ANZDATA登记处的数据,纳入澳大利亚肾移植失败后开始透析的患者(2000-2020年)。在肾移植失败后12个月,性别与腹膜透析(PD)和家庭血液透析(HHD)摄取之间的关系采用调整后的逻辑回归进行了检验,并评估了性别和SES之间的相互作用。结果:在3521例首次肾移植失败的患者中,1352例(38%)为女性。移植失败后12个月,483例(14%)PD患者维持生存,425例(12%)HHD患者维持生存。与女性相比,男性在移植失败后12个月选择PD的可能性较小,调整后的OR (95%CI)为0.55(0.44-0.68)。男性12月龄时摄取HHD的校正OR (95%CI)为1.66(1.29-2.12)。性别和社会经济地位对PD和HHD的12个月摄取存在显著的相互作用,对于社会经济条件较差地区的患者,男性患者PD和HHD摄取的调整ORs分别为0.61(0.45-0.84)和2.25(1.51-3.51)。结论:与女性患者相比,失去同种异体肾脏移植的男性患者更有可能选择HHD而不是PD。这种性别差异在社会经济弱势地区的个体中更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Nephrology
American Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
74
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The ''American Journal of Nephrology'' is a peer-reviewed journal that focuses on timely topics in both basic science and clinical research. Papers are divided into several sections, including:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信