Soybean overcome differences in row spacing and seeding rate to maintain stable yield

IF 0.8 Q3 AGRONOMY
Natan Seraglio, Mila Pessotto, Andrew Weaver, Mark A. Licht
{"title":"Soybean overcome differences in row spacing and seeding rate to maintain stable yield","authors":"Natan Seraglio,&nbsp;Mila Pessotto,&nbsp;Andrew Weaver,&nbsp;Mark A. Licht","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] is a crucial crop for global food, feed, and biofuel industries, with its yield influenced by agronomic practices such as row spacing and seeding rate. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of these practices on soybean yield across 7 years (2016–2023) in Iowa. Using a split-split-plot design, we examined three row spacings (15, 20, and 30 inches) and varying seeding rates at two experimental sites. The research was conducted under typical Iowa conditions with different soybean cultivars and soil types. Grain yield data were standardized to 13% moisture and analyzed using ANOVA to assess the interactions between row spacing, seeding rate, and cultivar. Results indicated the effects of row spacing and seeding rate on yield were inconsistent across years and locations. Narrower row spacings (15 and 20 inches) tended to improve yield in high-productivity environments, while wider spacing (30 inches) performed better in some low-yielding environments. The seeding rate response varied, with no clear pattern across site-years, suggesting that soybean plants can compensate for lower planting densities by adjusting branching and pod set. These findings highlight the adaptability of soybean to different planting practices, offering farmers flexibility in optimizing seeding rates and row spacings without significant yield loss. This research provides valuable insights into potentially reducing input costs while maintaining productivity in soybean production.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70033","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cft2.70033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is a crucial crop for global food, feed, and biofuel industries, with its yield influenced by agronomic practices such as row spacing and seeding rate. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of these practices on soybean yield across 7 years (2016–2023) in Iowa. Using a split-split-plot design, we examined three row spacings (15, 20, and 30 inches) and varying seeding rates at two experimental sites. The research was conducted under typical Iowa conditions with different soybean cultivars and soil types. Grain yield data were standardized to 13% moisture and analyzed using ANOVA to assess the interactions between row spacing, seeding rate, and cultivar. Results indicated the effects of row spacing and seeding rate on yield were inconsistent across years and locations. Narrower row spacings (15 and 20 inches) tended to improve yield in high-productivity environments, while wider spacing (30 inches) performed better in some low-yielding environments. The seeding rate response varied, with no clear pattern across site-years, suggesting that soybean plants can compensate for lower planting densities by adjusting branching and pod set. These findings highlight the adaptability of soybean to different planting practices, offering farmers flexibility in optimizing seeding rates and row spacings without significant yield loss. This research provides valuable insights into potentially reducing input costs while maintaining productivity in soybean production.

Abstract Image

大豆克服了行距和播种量的差异,保持了产量的稳定
大豆[甘氨酸max (L.)]稳定。[]是全球粮食、饲料和生物燃料工业的重要作物,其产量受行距和播种率等农艺措施的影响。本研究旨在评估这些做法对爱荷华州7年(2016-2023年)大豆产量的影响。采用分块-分块设计,我们在两个试验点检查了三种行距(15、20和30英寸)和不同的播种率。在典型的爱荷华州条件下,采用不同的大豆品种和土壤类型进行研究。将粮食产量数据标准化为13%的水分,并使用方差分析来评估行距、播种率和品种之间的相互作用。结果表明,行距和播种量对产量的影响在不同年份和地点不一致。在高产环境中,较窄的行距(15和20英寸)倾向于提高产量,而在一些低产环境中,较宽的行距(30英寸)效果更好。不同立地年对播种率的响应变化不明显,表明大豆植株可以通过调节分枝和结荚来补偿较低的播种密度。这些发现突出了大豆对不同种植方式的适应性,为农民提供了优化播种率和行间距的灵活性,而不会造成显著的产量损失。这项研究为在保持大豆生产生产力的同时降低投入成本提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management is a peer-reviewed, international, electronic journal covering all aspects of applied crop, forage and grazinglands, and turfgrass management. The journal serves the professions related to the management of crops, forages and grazinglands, and turfgrass by publishing research, briefs, reviews, perspectives, and diagnostic and management guides that are beneficial to researchers, practitioners, educators, and industry representatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信