{"title":"Numerical study of converging shock wave interaction with offset gas bubble containing different gases - Ne, Ar or CO2","authors":"D. Igra , O. Igra","doi":"10.1016/j.euromechflu.2025.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a numerical investigation of the interaction between a converging shock wave and an offset cylindrical gas bubble containing Ne, Ar, or CO<sub>2</sub>. Based on the good agreement with experimental findings shown in our previous study, we explored how these gases influence shock wave patterns when a converging shock wave propagating at a Mach number of 1.18 impacts a 50 mm diameter cylindrical bubble. The results reveal complex shock wave dynamics that differ from those observed when planar shocks impact on a cylindrical gas bubble or when a converging shock wave impacts a cylindrical gas bubble located at the center of its focus. Notably, in the case of a Ne-filled bubble, the shock wave focus is outside of the initial bubble location. Each gas produced distinct shock wave behaviors: the Ne bubble exhibited lens-like shock patterns, while in the Ar bubble's case the transmitted and converging shock waves were circular. A second shock wave focusing of the transmitted shock wave was observed inside the Ar bubble, similar to the case of the CO<sub>2</sub> bubble, which experienced earlier focusing than in the SF<sub>6</sub> case (previously studied) but later than Ar. The position of the transmitted shock wave's focus within the bubble varies with gas density, showing that heavier gases result in a focal point located further inside the bubble.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11985,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Mechanics B-fluids","volume":"112 ","pages":"Pages 22-36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Mechanics B-fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0997754625000159","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study presents a numerical investigation of the interaction between a converging shock wave and an offset cylindrical gas bubble containing Ne, Ar, or CO2. Based on the good agreement with experimental findings shown in our previous study, we explored how these gases influence shock wave patterns when a converging shock wave propagating at a Mach number of 1.18 impacts a 50 mm diameter cylindrical bubble. The results reveal complex shock wave dynamics that differ from those observed when planar shocks impact on a cylindrical gas bubble or when a converging shock wave impacts a cylindrical gas bubble located at the center of its focus. Notably, in the case of a Ne-filled bubble, the shock wave focus is outside of the initial bubble location. Each gas produced distinct shock wave behaviors: the Ne bubble exhibited lens-like shock patterns, while in the Ar bubble's case the transmitted and converging shock waves were circular. A second shock wave focusing of the transmitted shock wave was observed inside the Ar bubble, similar to the case of the CO2 bubble, which experienced earlier focusing than in the SF6 case (previously studied) but later than Ar. The position of the transmitted shock wave's focus within the bubble varies with gas density, showing that heavier gases result in a focal point located further inside the bubble.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids publishes papers in all fields of fluid mechanics. Although investigations in well-established areas are within the scope of the journal, recent developments and innovative ideas are particularly welcome. Theoretical, computational and experimental papers are equally welcome. Mathematical methods, be they deterministic or stochastic, analytical or numerical, will be accepted provided they serve to clarify some identifiable problems in fluid mechanics, and provided the significance of results is explained. Similarly, experimental papers must add physical insight in to the understanding of fluid mechanics.