Footprint of uncertainty in the context of Bow-tie risk tool using fuzzy logic

IF 8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
V.A.O. Silva, R. Santana, R.I. Tsukada, S.S.V. Vianna, F.V. Silva
{"title":"Footprint of uncertainty in the context of Bow-tie risk tool using fuzzy logic","authors":"V.A.O. Silva,&nbsp;R. Santana,&nbsp;R.I. Tsukada,&nbsp;S.S.V. Vianna,&nbsp;F.V. Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Bow-tie method is a qualitative risk analysis tool known for its effectiveness in visualizing the relationships between causes, barriers, and consequences. In this paper, we present a novel approach to quantifying Bow-tie diagram outcomes by incorporating uncertainty in both input and output parameters. We utilize fuzzy inference to aggregate frequencies and probabilities of failure on demand (PFD). Two fuzzy logic systems are tested: the Type 1 Fuzzy Logic System (T1FLS), and the Interval Type 2 Fuzzy Logic System (IT2FLS), applied here for the first time. The primary innovation of this work lies in the application of IT2FLS, which introduces the concept of the footprint of uncertainty (FOU) to better account for uncertainty in the membership functions of linguistic variables. To validate these models, both were adjusted using expert knowledge to replicate the behavior of the Bow-tie combined with Layers of Protection Analysis (probabilistic model). Simulations compared the proposed methods to the probabilistic model, with sensitivity analyses examining variations in protection barrier failure probabilities. The T1FLS achieved a normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 9.54%, while the IT2FLS reached 12.82%. For the normalized root mean square logarithmic error (NRMSLE), T1FLS yielded 4.65%, and IT2FLS 6.30%. The methods showed 87.32% similarity in ranking protection barrier sensitivity indices. The findings suggest both fuzzy systems exhibit strong potential for accurately representing complex systems with inherent uncertainties, making them valuable tools for risk analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50523,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 110335"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197625003355","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Bow-tie method is a qualitative risk analysis tool known for its effectiveness in visualizing the relationships between causes, barriers, and consequences. In this paper, we present a novel approach to quantifying Bow-tie diagram outcomes by incorporating uncertainty in both input and output parameters. We utilize fuzzy inference to aggregate frequencies and probabilities of failure on demand (PFD). Two fuzzy logic systems are tested: the Type 1 Fuzzy Logic System (T1FLS), and the Interval Type 2 Fuzzy Logic System (IT2FLS), applied here for the first time. The primary innovation of this work lies in the application of IT2FLS, which introduces the concept of the footprint of uncertainty (FOU) to better account for uncertainty in the membership functions of linguistic variables. To validate these models, both were adjusted using expert knowledge to replicate the behavior of the Bow-tie combined with Layers of Protection Analysis (probabilistic model). Simulations compared the proposed methods to the probabilistic model, with sensitivity analyses examining variations in protection barrier failure probabilities. The T1FLS achieved a normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 9.54%, while the IT2FLS reached 12.82%. For the normalized root mean square logarithmic error (NRMSLE), T1FLS yielded 4.65%, and IT2FLS 6.30%. The methods showed 87.32% similarity in ranking protection barrier sensitivity indices. The findings suggest both fuzzy systems exhibit strong potential for accurately representing complex systems with inherent uncertainties, making them valuable tools for risk analysis.
足迹不确定性背景下的领结风险工具运用模糊逻辑
领结法是一种定性风险分析工具,因其在可视化原因、障碍和后果之间的关系方面的有效性而闻名。在本文中,我们提出了一种量化领结图结果的新方法,通过纳入输入和输出参数的不确定性。我们利用模糊推理来计算按需故障(PFD)的总频率和概率。本文测试了两个模糊逻辑系统:第一类模糊逻辑系统(T1FLS)和第二类模糊逻辑系统(IT2FLS)。这项工作的主要创新在于IT2FLS的应用,它引入了不确定性足迹(FOU)的概念,以更好地解释语言变量隶属函数中的不确定性。为了验证这些模型,使用专家知识来复制Bow-tie结合保护层分析(概率模型)的行为。仿真将所提出的方法与概率模型进行了比较,并对保护屏障失效概率的变化进行了灵敏度分析。T1FLS的归一化均方根误差(NRMSE)为9.54%,而IT2FLS的归一化均方根误差为12.82%。对于归一化的均方根对数误差(NRMSLE), T1FLS为4.65%,IT2FLS为6.30%。两种方法对保护屏障敏感性指标的排序相似度为87.32%。研究结果表明,这两种模糊系统在准确表示具有内在不确定性的复杂系统方面表现出强大的潜力,使它们成为风险分析的宝贵工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
505
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is pivotal in driving the fourth industrial revolution, witnessing remarkable advancements across various machine learning methodologies. AI techniques have become indispensable tools for practicing engineers, enabling them to tackle previously insurmountable challenges. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence serves as a global platform for the swift dissemination of research elucidating the practical application of AI methods across all engineering disciplines. Submitted papers are expected to present novel aspects of AI utilized in real-world engineering applications, validated using publicly available datasets to ensure the replicability of research outcomes. Join us in exploring the transformative potential of AI in engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信